Literature DB >> 26907840

Performance and Endocrine Responses to Differing Ratios of Concurrent Strength and Endurance Training.

Thomas W Jones1, Glyn Howatson, Mark Russell, Duncan N French.   

Abstract

The present study examined functional strength and endocrine responses to varying ratios of strength and endurance training in a concurrent training regimen. Thirty resistance trained men completed 6 weeks of 3 d·wk of (a) strength training (ST), (b) concurrent strength and endurance training ratio 3:1 (CT3), (c) concurrent strength and endurance training ratio 1:1 (CT1), or (d) no training (CON). Strength training was conducted using whole-body multijoint exercises, whereas endurance training consisted of treadmill running. Assessments of maximal strength, lower-body power, and endocrine factors were conducted pretraining and after 3 and 6 weeks. After the intervention, ST and CT3 elicited similar increases in lower-body strength; furthermore, ST resulted in greater increases than CT1 and CON (all p ≤ 0.05). All training conditions resulted in similar increases in upper-body strength after training. The ST group observed greater increases in lower-body power than all other conditions (all p ≤ 0.05). After the final training session, CT1 elicited greater increases in cortisol than ST (p = 0.008). When implemented as part of a concurrent training regimen, higher volumes of endurance training result in the inhibition of lower-body strength, whereas low volumes do not. Lower-body power was attenuated by high and low frequencies of endurance training. Higher frequencies of endurance training resulted in increased cortisol responses to training. These data suggest that if strength development is the primary focus of a training intervention, frequency of endurance training should remain low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26907840     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  Aerobic exercise intensity does not affect the anabolic signaling following resistance exercise in endurance athletes.

Authors:  T W Jones; L Eddens; J Kupusarevic; D C M Simoes; M J W Furber; K A van Someren; G Howatson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Development of Maximal Dynamic Strength During Concurrent Resistance and Endurance Training in Untrained, Moderately Trained, and Trained Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henrik Petré; Erik Hemmingsson; Hans Rosdahl; Niklas Psilander
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Compatibility of Concurrent Aerobic and Strength Training for Skeletal Muscle Size and Function: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Moritz Schumann; Joshua F Feuerbacher; Marvin Sünkeler; Nils Freitag; Bent R Rønnestad; Kenji Doma; Tommy R Lundberg
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Acute physiological and perceptual responses to a netball specific training session in professional female netball players.

Authors:  Laurence P Birdsey; Matthew Weston; Mark Russell; Michael Johnston; Christian J Cook; Liam P Kilduff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of Cycling Intensity on Acute Signaling Adaptations to 8-weeks Concurrent Training in Trained Cyclists.

Authors:  T W Jones; L Eddens; J Kupusarevic; D C M Simoes; M J W Furber; K A Van Someren; G Howatson
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  The Effects of Concurrent Aerobic and Strength Training on Muscle Fiber Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tommy R Lundberg; Joshua F Feuerbacher; Marvin Sünkeler; Moritz Schumann
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 11.928

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.