Alassane Dicko1, Joelle M Brown2, Halimatou Diawara1, Ibrahima Baber1, Almahamoudou Mahamar1, Harouna M Soumare1, Koualy Sanogo1, Fanta Koita1, Sekouba Keita1, Sekou F Traore1, Ingrid Chen3, Eugenie Poirot4, Jimee Hwang5, Charles McCulloch2, Kjerstin Lanke6, Helmi Pett7, Mikko Niemi8, François Nosten9, Teun Bousema10, Roly Gosling11. 1. Malaria Research and Training Centre, Faculty of Pharmacy and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Science, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako, Bamako, Mali. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Global Health Group, Malaria Elimination Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Global Health Group, Malaria Elimination Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 5. Global Health Group, Malaria Elimination Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Malaria Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; President's Malaria Initiative, Washington, DC, USA. 6. Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands. 7. Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. 8. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. 9. Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand. 10. Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Department of Immunology & Infection, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 11. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Global Health Group, Malaria Elimination Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: roly.gosling@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Single low doses of primaquine, when added to artemisinin-based combination therapy, might prevent transmission of Plasmodium falciparum malaria to mosquitoes. We aimed to establish the activity and safety of four low doses of primaquine combined with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in male patients in Mali. METHODS: In this phase 2, single-blind, dose-ranging, adaptive randomised trial, we enrolled boys and men with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria at the Malaria Research and Training Centre (MRTC) field site in Ouelessebougou, Mali. All participants were confirmed positive carriers of gametocytes through microscopy and had normal function of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) on colorimetric quantification. In the first phase, participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to one of three primaquine doses: 0 mg/kg (control), 0·125 mg/kg, and 0·5 mg/kg. Randomisation was done with a computer-generated randomisation list (in block sizes of six) and concealed with sealed, opaque envelopes. In the second phase, different participants were sequentially assigned (1:1) to 0·25 mg/kg primaquine or 0·0625 mg/kg primaquine. Primaquine tablets were dissolved into a solution and administered orally in a single dose. Participants were also given a 3 day course of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, administered by weight (320 mg dihydroartemisinin and 40 mg piperaquine per tablet). Outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation, but participants were permitted to find out group assignment. Infectivity was assessed through membrane-feeding assays, which were optimised through the beginning part of phase one. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean within-person percentage change in mosquito infectivity 2 days after primaquine treatment in participants who completed the study after optimisation of the infectivity assay, had both a pre-treatment infectivity measurement and at least one follow-up infectivity measurement, and who were given the correct primaquine dose. The safety endpoint was the mean within-person change in haemoglobin concentration during 28 days of study follow-up in participants with at least one follow-up visit. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01743820. FINDINGS:Between Jan 2, 2013, and Nov 27, 2014, we enrolled 81 participants. In the primary analysis sample (n=71), participants in the 0·25 mg/kg primaquine dose group (n=15) and 0·5 mg/kg primaquine dose group (n=14) had significantly lower mean within-person reductions in infectivity at day 2-92·6% (95% CI 78·3-100; p=0·0014) for the 0·25 mg/kg group; and 75·0% (45·7-100; p=0·014) for the 0·5 mg/kg primaquine group-compared with those in the control group (n=14; 11·3% [-27·4 to 50·0]). Reductions were not significantly different from control for participants assigned to the 0·0625 mg/kg dose group (n=16; 41·9% [1·4-82·5]; p=0·16) and the 0·125 mg/kg dose group (n=12; 54·9% [13·4-96·3]; p=0·096). No clinically meaningful or statistically significant drops in haemoglobin were recorded in any individual in the haemoglobin analysis (n=70) during follow-up. No serious adverse events were reported and adverse events did not differ between treatment groups. INTERPRETATION: A single dose of 0·25 mg/kg primaquine, given alongside dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, was safe and efficacious for the prevention of P falciparum malaria transmission in boys and men who are not deficient in G6PD. Future studies should assess the safety of single-dose primaquine in G6PD-deficient individuals to define the therapeutic range of primaquine to enable the safe roll-out of community interventions with primaquine. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Single low doses of primaquine, when added to artemisinin-based combination therapy, might prevent transmission of Plasmodium falciparum malaria to mosquitoes. We aimed to establish the activity and safety of four low doses of primaquine combined with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in male patients in Mali. METHODS: In this phase 2, single-blind, dose-ranging, adaptive randomised trial, we enrolled boys and men with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria at the Malaria Research and Training Centre (MRTC) field site in Ouelessebougou, Mali. All participants were confirmed positive carriers of gametocytes through microscopy and had normal function of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) on colorimetric quantification. In the first phase, participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to one of three primaquine doses: 0 mg/kg (control), 0·125 mg/kg, and 0·5 mg/kg. Randomisation was done with a computer-generated randomisation list (in block sizes of six) and concealed with sealed, opaque envelopes. In the second phase, different participants were sequentially assigned (1:1) to 0·25 mg/kg primaquine or 0·0625 mg/kg primaquine. Primaquine tablets were dissolved into a solution and administered orally in a single dose. Participants were also given a 3 day course of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, administered by weight (320 mg dihydroartemisinin and 40 mg piperaquine per tablet). Outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation, but participants were permitted to find out group assignment. Infectivity was assessed through membrane-feeding assays, which were optimised through the beginning part of phase one. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean within-person percentage change in mosquito infectivity 2 days after primaquine treatment in participants who completed the study after optimisation of the infectivity assay, had both a pre-treatment infectivity measurement and at least one follow-up infectivity measurement, and who were given the correct primaquine dose. The safety endpoint was the mean within-person change in haemoglobin concentration during 28 days of study follow-up in participants with at least one follow-up visit. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01743820. FINDINGS: Between Jan 2, 2013, and Nov 27, 2014, we enrolled 81 participants. In the primary analysis sample (n=71), participants in the 0·25 mg/kg primaquine dose group (n=15) and 0·5 mg/kg primaquine dose group (n=14) had significantly lower mean within-person reductions in infectivity at day 2-92·6% (95% CI 78·3-100; p=0·0014) for the 0·25 mg/kg group; and 75·0% (45·7-100; p=0·014) for the 0·5 mg/kg primaquine group-compared with those in the control group (n=14; 11·3% [-27·4 to 50·0]). Reductions were not significantly different from control for participants assigned to the 0·0625 mg/kg dose group (n=16; 41·9% [1·4-82·5]; p=0·16) and the 0·125 mg/kg dose group (n=12; 54·9% [13·4-96·3]; p=0·096). No clinically meaningful or statistically significant drops in haemoglobin were recorded in any individual in the haemoglobin analysis (n=70) during follow-up. No serious adverse events were reported and adverse events did not differ between treatment groups. INTERPRETATION: A single dose of 0·25 mg/kg primaquine, given alongside dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, was safe and efficacious for the prevention of P falciparum malaria transmission in boys and men who are not deficient in G6PD. Future studies should assess the safety of single-dose primaquine in G6PD-deficient individuals to define the therapeutic range of primaquine to enable the safe roll-out of community interventions with primaquine. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Authors: Manu Vanaerschot; Leonardo Lucantoni; Tao Li; Jill M Combrinck; Andrea Ruecker; T R Santha Kumar; Kelly Rubiano; Pedro E Ferreira; Giulia Siciliano; Sonia Gulati; Philipp P Henrich; Caroline L Ng; James M Murithi; Victoria C Corey; Sandra Duffy; Ori J Lieberman; M Isabel Veiga; Robert E Sinden; Pietro Alano; Michael J Delves; Kim Lee Sim; Elizabeth A Winzeler; Timothy J Egan; Stephen L Hoffman; Vicky M Avery; David A Fidock Journal: Nat Microbiol Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 17.745
Authors: Ailie Robinson; Annette O Busula; Mirjam A Voets; Khalid B Beshir; John C Caulfield; Stephen J Powers; Niels O Verhulst; Peter Winskill; Julian Muwanguzi; Michael A Birkett; Renate C Smallegange; Daniel K Masiga; W Richard Mukabana; Robert W Sauerwein; Colin J Sutherland; Teun Bousema; John A Pickett; Willem Takken; James G Logan; Jetske G de Boer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Matthew M Ippolito; Julia Johnson; Christopher Mullin; Christopher Mallow; Nadia Morgan; Erika Wallender; Tianjing Li; Philip J Rosenthal Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Rithea Leang; Naw Htee Khu; Mavuto Mukaka; Mark Debackere; Rupam Tripura; Soy Ty Kheang; Say Chy; Neeraj Kak; Philippe Buchy; Arnaud Tarantola; Didier Menard; Arantxa Roca-Felterer; Rick M Fairhurst; Sim Kheng; Sinoun Muth; Song Ngak; Arjen M Dondorp; Nicholas J White; Walter Robert John Taylor Journal: BMC Med Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 8.775