Joseph Donohoe1, Vince Marshall2, Xi Tan3, Fabian T Camacho4, Roger T Anderson4, Rajesh Balkrishnan5. 1. Mountain Pacific Quality Health, Helena, MT, USA. 2. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA. 4. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA. 5. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA rbgws@yahoo.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The goal of this research was to examine spatial access to primary care physicians in Appalachia using both traditional access measures and the 2-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. Spatial access to care was compared between urban and rural regions of Appalachia. METHODS: The study region included Appalachia counties of Pennsylvania, Ohio, Kentucky, and North Carolina. Primary care physicians during 2008 and total census block group populations were geocoded into GIS software. Ratios of county physicians to population, driving time to nearest primary care physician, and various 2SFCA approaches were compared. RESULTS: Urban areas of the study region had shorter travel times to their closest primary care physician. Provider to population ratios produced results that varied widely from one county to another because of strict geographic boundaries. The 2SFCA method produced varied results depending on the distance decay weight and variable catchment size techniques chose. 2SFCA scores showed greater access to care in urban areas of Pennsylvania, Ohio, and North Carolina. CONCLUSION: The different parameters of the 2SFCA method-distance decay weights and variable catchment sizes-have a large impact on the resulting spatial access to primary care scores. The findings of this study suggest that using a relative 2SFCA approach, the spatial access ratio method, when detailed patient travel data are unavailable. The 2SFCA method shows promise for measuring access to care in Appalachia, but more research on patient travel preferences is needed to inform implementation.
PURPOSE: The goal of this research was to examine spatial access to primary care physicians in Appalachia using both traditional access measures and the 2-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. Spatial access to care was compared between urban and rural regions of Appalachia. METHODS: The study region included Appalachia counties of Pennsylvania, Ohio, Kentucky, and North Carolina. Primary care physicians during 2008 and total census block group populations were geocoded into GIS software. Ratios of county physicians to population, driving time to nearest primary care physician, and various 2SFCA approaches were compared. RESULTS: Urban areas of the study region had shorter travel times to their closest primary care physician. Provider to population ratios produced results that varied widely from one county to another because of strict geographic boundaries. The 2SFCA method produced varied results depending on the distance decay weight and variable catchment size techniques chose. 2SFCA scores showed greater access to care in urban areas of Pennsylvania, Ohio, and North Carolina. CONCLUSION: The different parameters of the 2SFCA method-distance decay weights and variable catchment sizes-have a large impact on the resulting spatial access to primary care scores. The findings of this study suggest that using a relative 2SFCA approach, the spatial access ratio method, when detailed patient travel data are unavailable. The 2SFCA method shows promise for measuring access to care in Appalachia, but more research on patient travel preferences is needed to inform implementation.
Authors: William B Weeks; Lewis E Kazis; Yujing Shen; Zhongxiao Cong; Xinhua S Ren; Donald Miller; Austin Lee; Jonathan B Perlin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Roger T Anderson; Tse-Chang Yang; Stephen A Matthews; Fabian Camacho; Teresa Kern; Heath B Mackley; Gretchen Kimmick; Christopher Louis; Eugene Lengerich; Nengliang Yao Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Eugene J Lengerich; Thomas C Tucker; Raymond K Powell; Pat Colsher; Erik Lehman; Ann J Ward; Jennifer C Siedlecki; Stephen W Wyatt Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2005 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Sara N Kiani; Katherine M Rich; Darby Herkert; Cara Safon; Rafael Pérez-Escamilla Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Eliana Sullivan; Whitney E Zahnd; Jane M Zhu; Erin Kenzie; Mary Patzel; Melinda Davis Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-01-03 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Jing Luo; Guangping Chen; Chang Li; Bingyan Xia; Xuan Sun; Siyun Chen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 3.390