Literature DB >> 26906240

Investigation of the Efficacy of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Versus Irrigation with Reciprocating Activation: An Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.

Augusto Shoji Kato1, Rodrigo Sanches Cunha2, Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno3, Rina Andrea Pelegrine3, Carlos Eduardo Fontana3, Alexandre Sigrist de Martin3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this ex vivo study was to compare the efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) versus a new activation system using reciprocating motion (EasyClean [EC]; Easy Equipamentos Odontológicos, Belo Horizonte, Brazil) to remove debris from the root canal walls at 6 predetermined apical levels using environmental scanning electron microscopy.
METHODS: Mesiobuccal root canals of 10 mandibular molars were prepared with a 30/.05 final instrument. The specimens were embedded in flasks containing heavy body silicone, cleaved longitudinally, and 6 round indentations were made into the apical region of the buccal half at 1-mm intervals. The same specimens were used to prepare a blank control group (no debris), a negative control group (completely covered by debris), and 2 experimental groups: PUI and irrigation with reciprocating activation. Standardized images of the indentations were obtained under environmental scanning electron microscopy and assessed by 2 examiners. The amount of debris was then classified using a 4-category scoring system. The kappa test was applied to determine interexaminer agreement, whereas the Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn, and Friedman tests were used to compare scores.
RESULTS: The EC group had results statistically similar to those of the blank control group for all 6 root levels examined. The PUI group had results statistically similar to those of the negative control group for the 3 most apical levels and similar to those of the blank control group for the 3 most cervical levels.
CONCLUSIONS: Activating the irrigant with a reciprocating system (EC) promoted more effective debris removal from the more apical regions of the root canal when compared with PUI.
Copyright © 2016 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Debris; endodontic irrigation; environmental scanning electron microscopy; reciprocating motion; ultrasonics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26906240     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  14 in total

1.  Micro-CT evaluation of four final irrigation protocols on hard-tissue debris removal from mesial roots of mandibular molars containing isthmus.

Authors:  Bianca Marques de Mattos de Araujo; Alessandra Timponi Goes Cruz; Lucila Piasecki; Mariel Webber; Everdan Carneiro; Vânia Portela Ditzel Westphalen; Ulisses Xavier da Silva Neto
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  Ex-vivo Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Two Activated Irrigation Techniques After Reciprocating Instrumentation in Curved Canals.

Authors:  Tamara Costa Lopes Schiavotelo; Marcelo Santos Coelho; Luis Cardoso Rasquin; Daniel Guimarães Pedro Rocha; Carlos Eduardo Fontana; Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2017-10-16

3.  The use of auxiliary devices during irrigation to increase the cleaning ability of a chelating agent.

Authors:  Marina Carvalho Prado; Fernanda Leal; Renata Antoun Simão; Heloisa Gusman; Maíra do Prado
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2017-02-03

4.  Smear layer removal by different chemical solutions used with or without ultrasonic activation after post preparation.

Authors:  Daniel Poletto; Ana Claudia Poletto; Andressa Cavalaro; Ricardo Machado; Leopoldo Cosme-Silva; Cássia Cilene Dezan Garbelini; Márcio Grama Hoeppner
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2017-11-01

5.  Comparisons by microcomputed tomography of the efficiency of different irrigation techniques for removing dentinal debris from artificial grooves.

Authors:  Francine Cesario; Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte; Jussaro Alves Duque; Murilo Priori Alcalde; Flaviana Bombarda de Andrade; Marcus Vinicius Reis So; Bruno Carvalho De Vasconcelos; Rodrigo Ricci Vivan
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug

6.  Efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation, continuous ultrasonic irrigation versus irrigation with reciprocating activation device in penetration into main and simulated lateral canals.

Authors:  Caio Cesar Souza; Carlos Eduardo Bueno; Augusto Shoji Kato; Ana Grasiela Limoeiro; Carlos Eduardo Fontana; Rina Andrea Pelegrine
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr

7.  Antibacterial Efficacy of the Grape Seed Extract as an Irrigant for Root Canal Preparation.

Authors:  Fernando Soveral D'aviz; Ediléia Lodi; Matheus Albino Souza; Ana Paula Farina; Doglas Cecchin
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2020-03-20

8.  Efficacy of a new Activation Device in Irrigant Penetration Into Simulated Lateral Canals.

Authors:  Carlos Vieira Andrade-Junior; Rafaela M Batista; Marilia Marceliano-Alves; Flávio Rodrigues Ferreira Alves; Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2016-09-29

9.  Root Preparation of Deciduous Teeth: Efficacy of WaveOne and ProTaper Systems with and without Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation.

Authors:  Bruno Marques da Silva; Fabrício Scaini; Flávia Sens Fagundes Tomazinho; Carla Castiglia Gonzaga; Marilisa Carneiro Leão Gabardo; Flares Baratto-Filho
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2018

10.  Assessment of Extrusion and Postoperative Pain of a Bioceramic and Resin-Based Root Canal Sealer.

Authors:  Braúlio Fonseca; Marcelo Santos Coelho; Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno; Carlos Eduardo Fontana; Alexandre Sigrist De Martin; Daniel Guimarães Pedro Rocha
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.