| Literature DB >> 26906144 |
Bang Feng1, Qi Zhao1, Jianping Xu2, Jiao Qin1,3, Zhu L Yang1.
Abstract
The orogenesis of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and the Quaternary climate changes have played key roles in driving the evolution of flora and fauna in Southwest China, but their effects on higher fungi are poorly addressed. In this study, we investigated the phylogeographic pattern of the Tuber indicum species complex, an economically important fungal group distributed in the Hengduan Mountains region. Our data confirmed the existence of two distinct lineages, T. indicum and T. himalayense, within this species complex. Three geographic groups (Groups W, N and C) were revealed within T. indicum, with Group W found in the paleo-Lancang River region, while Groups N and C corresponded to the two banks along the contemporary Jinsha River, suggesting that rivers have acted as barriers for gene flow among populations from different drainages. Historical range expansion resulted from climate changes was inferred in Group C, contributing to the observed gene flow among geographic populations within this group. Although no significant geographic structure was identified in T. himalayense, evidence of drainage isolation for this species was also detected. Our findings demonstrate that both topographic changes and Quaternary climate oscillations have played important roles in driving the genetic structures of the T. indicum species complex.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26906144 PMCID: PMC4764814 DOI: 10.1038/srep21811
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Collection sites for the Tuber indicum species complex and distribution patterns of geographic groups within this species complex.
(a) shows the phylogenetic tree generated from the 77 haplotypes of the T. indicum species complex, with two species, T. indicum and T. himalayense, identified. (b,c) display the distribution patterns of the geographic groups identified within T. indicum and T. himalayense respectively. (d) gives the haplotype network generated from the 77 haplotypes of the T. indicum species complex. All maps were drawn using ArcGIS V.10.2 (ESRI, CA, USA) and then improved in Adobe Illustrator CC (Adobe Systems Inc., CA, USA).
Results of the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for four-gene sequence data of the Tuber indicum species complex.
| Source of variation | Degree of freedom | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation | Index fixation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among groups | 1 | 2465.805 | 15.65706 | 75.59 | |
| Among populations within groups | 32 | 1173.919 | 3.75174 | 18.11 | |
| Within populations | 293 | 381.811 | 1.30311 | 6.29 | |
| Total | 326 | 4021.535 | 20.71191 | 0.937 (p < 0.01) |
Summary of haplotype information and genetic diversity of each population within Tuber indicum and T. himalayense.
| Code | Genetic diversity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haplotypes (numbers of individuals) | Hp | Hd | π (×10−2) | |
| YR | H1(4), H2(3), H3(5) | 3 | 0.712 ± 0.069 | 0.820 ± 0.446 |
| MY | 1 | 0.500 ± 0.128 | 0.641 ± 0.365 | |
| YM | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| HP | H7(12), H8(5) | 2 | 0.441 ± 0.098 | 0.026 ± 0.027 |
| SHD | H9(19) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| EY | 4 | 0.861 ± 0.087 | 0.098 ± 0.072 | |
| LF | 2 | 0.511 ± 0.164 | 0.364 ± 0.213 | |
| BD | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| JCH | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| LQ | H17(1), H18(2), H19(1), H20(1), H21(1) | 5 | 0.933 ± 0.122 | 0.524 ± 0.325 |
| BCH | H22(4) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| HQ | 1 | 0.667 ± 0.314 | 0.039 ± 0.048 | |
| GSH | H24(7) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| HD | H25(11) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| YSH | H26(9) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| BSH | H27(8), | 1 | 0.579 ± 0.069 | 0.052 ± 0.041 |
| HP | H30(4) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| WX | H31(7) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| SHB | 1 | 0.639 ± 0.126 | 0.149 ± 0.100 | |
| HX | 0 | 0.800 ± 0.100 | 0.331 ± 0.196 | |
| WSH | 3 | 0.833 ± 0.127 | 0.381 ± 0.226 | |
| NH | H42(6), H43(1), H44(1), H45(1) | 4 | 0.583 ± 0.183 | 0.397 ± 0.234 |
| NJ | 2 | 0.378 ± 0.181 | 0.224 ± 0.139 | |
| TD | 2 | 0.810 ± 0.130 | 0.166 ± 0.114 | |
| LJ | 1 | 0.286 ± 0.196 | 0.166 ± 0.114 | |
| LQ | H53(2) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| JCH | 7 | 0.937 ± 0.033 | 0.419 ± 0.229 | |
| KM | H61(2), | 1 | 0.356 ± 0.159 | 0.083 ± 0.062 |
| SM | 1 | 0.427 ± 0.169 | 0.224 ± 0.143 | |
| BCH | H64(2), H65(1) | 2 | 0.667 ± 0.314 | 0.388 ± 0.314 |
| NL | H66(8), H67(2) | 2 | 0.356 ± 0.159 | 0.083 ± 0.062 |
| HQ | H68(4), H69(1), H70(1) | 3 | 0.600 ± 0.215 | 0.097 ± 0.075 |
| XGLL | H71(9), H72(1) | 2 | 0.200 ± 0.154 | 0.105 ± 0.074 |
| HZ | H73(4), H74(1), H75(2), H76(1), H77(1) | 5 | 0.806 ± 0.120 | 0.172 ± 0.112 |
Haplotypes shared by different populations are underlined. Abbreviations: Hp, number of private haplotypes; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity.
Summary of results from neutrality tests and mismatch distribution analyses on Tuber indicum and T. himalayense, as well as three haplotype groups within T. indicum.
| Grouping | Tajima’s D | Fu’s Fs | Demographic expansion | Spatial expansion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSD | HRI | SSD | HRI | |||
| all | −0.817 | −13.542 | 0.009 | 0.014 | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| north | 1.079 | 7.167 | 0.065 | 0.166 | 0.043 | 0.166 |
| west | −0.806 | 0.572 | 0.027 | 0.063 | 0.027 | 0.063 |
| central | −0.421 | −5.515 | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| all | 2.157 | 3.041 | 0.903 | 0.025 | 0.023 | 0.025 |
**p < 0.01.
Figure 2Population demography of the Tuber indicum species complex estimated by mismatch distribution analyses.
(a) and (b) show the demographies of T. indicum and T. himalayense respectively, while (c), (d) and (e) show the demographies of Groups C, N and W of T. indicum respectively.
Figure 3Suitable habitats for the Tuber indicum species complex under current and the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) climatic conditions predicted by species distribution models.
0 and 1 indicate unsuitable and suitable habitats respectively. Red cycles show the localities where strains of each species were collected. (a, c) show the estimated distribution ranges of T. himalayense and T. indicum under current climatic condition. (b, d) show the estimated distribution ranges of T. himalayense and T. indicum under the LGM climatic condition. All maps were generated using ArcGIS V.10.2 (ESRI, CA, USA) and then improved in Adobe Illustrator CC (Adobe Systems Inc., CA, USA).