Literature DB >> 26905743

The Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Response to Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Dexing Wang, Li Duan, Zhiquan Tu, Fei Yan, Cuicui Zhang, Xu Li, Yuzhu Cao, Hongsheng Wen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Breast cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer death in women worldwide. The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), a cumulative prognostic score based on C-reactive protein and albumin, indicates the presence of a systemic inflammatory response. The GPS has been adopted as a powerful prognostic tool for patients with various types of malignant tumors, including breast cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the value of the GPS in predicting the response and toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast cancers in a progressive stage for consideration of chemotherapy were eligible. The clinical characteristics and demographics were recorded. The GPS was calculated before the onset of chemotherapy. Data on the response to chemotherapy and progression-free survival (PFS) were also collected. Objective tumor responses were evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Toxicities were graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTC) version 3.0 throughout therapy.
RESULTS: In total, 106 breast cancer patients were recruited. The GPS was associated with the response rate (p = 0.05), the clinical benefit rate (p = 0.03), and PFS (p = 0.005). The GPS was the only independent predictor of PFS (p = 0.005). The GPS was significantly associated with neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anorexia, nausea and vomiting, fatigue, and mucositis (p = 0.05-0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that GPS assessment is associated with poor clinical outcomes and severe chemotherapy-related toxicities in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have undergone chemotherapy, without any specific indication regarding the type of chemotherapy applied.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26905743     DOI: 10.1159/000443367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemotherapy        ISSN: 0009-3157            Impact factor:   2.544


  6 in total

Review 1.  Dealing with prognostic uncertainty: the role of prognostic models and websites for patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  David Hui; John P Maxwell; Carlos Eduardo Paiva
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.302

2.  miR-17 as a diagnostic biomarker regulates cell proliferation in breast cancer.

Authors:  Fangliang Yang; Yuan Li; Lingyun Xu; Yulan Zhu; Haiyan Gao; Lin Zhen; Lin Fang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  [18F]FDG uptake of bone marrow on PET/CT for predicting distant recurrence in breast cancer patients after surgical resection.

Authors:  Jeong Won Lee; Sung Yong Kim; Sun Wook Han; Jong Eun Lee; Hyun Ju Lee; Nam Hun Heo; Sang Mi Lee
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.138

4.  Prognostic Significance of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio in Luminal Breast Cancers With HER2-Negativity.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Danzhi Chen; Lidan Jin; Chenpu Xu; Wenhe Zhao; Wenxian Hu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Prognostic Influence of Preoperative Fibrinogen to Albumin Ratio for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ki-Tae Hwang; Jung Kee Chung; Eun Youn Roh; Jongjin Kim; Sohee Oh; Young A Kim; Jiyoung Rhu; Suzy Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.588

6.  Circular RNA CirCHIPK3 promotes cell proliferation and invasion of breast cancer by sponging miR-193a/HMGB1/PI3K/AKT axis.

Authors:  Zhen-Gang Chen; Hong-Jie Zhao; Ling Lin; Jin-Bo Liu; Jing-Zhen Bai; Guang-Shun Wang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.