| Literature DB >> 26905741 |
Shuo Jiao1, Weimin Chen1, Entao Wang2, Junman Wang1, Zhenshan Liu1, Yining Li1, Gehong Wei1.
Abstract
As a global problem, environmental pollution is an important factor to shape the microbial communities. The elucidation of the succession of microbial communities in response to pollutants is essential for developing bioremediation procedures. In the present study, ten batches of soil-enrichment subcultures were subjected to four treatments: phenanthrene, n-octadecane, phenanthrene + n-octadecane, or phenanthrene + n-octadecane + CdCl2. Forty pollutant-degrading consortia, corresponding to each batch of the four treatments were obtained. High-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene revealed that the diversity, richness and evenness of the consortia decreased throughout the subculturing procedure. The well-known hydrocarbon degraders Acinetobacter, Gordonia, Sphingobium, Sphingopyxis, and Castellaniella and several other genera, including Niabella and Naxibacter, were detected in the enriched consortia. The predominant microbes varied and the microbial community in the consortia gradually changed during the successive subculturing depending on the treatment, indicating that the pollutants influenced the microbial successions. Comparison of the networks in the treatments indicated that organic pollutants and CdCl2 affected the co-occurrence patterns in enriched consortia. In conclusion, single environmental factors, such as the addition of nutrients or selection pressure, can shape microbial communities and partially explain the extensive differences in microbial community structures among diverse environments.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26905741 PMCID: PMC4764846 DOI: 10.1038/srep21791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Microbial alpha-diversity characteristics for enriched consortia and original soil.
*standard deviation.
Figure 1Distinct microbial patterns of the different treatments.
(a) Weighted UniFrac distance principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of microbial communities among the forty consortia in the four treatments. 80% confidence ellipses are shown around each treatment group. (b) LDA effect size taxonomic cladogram comparing all consortia categorized according to treatments. Significantly discriminant taxon nodes are colored, and branch areas are shaded according to the highest-ranked variety for that taxon. The yellow nodes correspond to taxa that were not significantly differentially represented between treatment groups. Highly abundant and selected taxa are indicated: a, Microbarterium; b, Nakamurella; c, Nakamurellaceae; d, Gordonia; e, Nodcardiaceae; f, Nitrobacter; g, Aeromicrobium; h, Nocardiodidaceae; i, Phyllobacteriaceae; j, Novosphingobium; k, Sphingobium; l, Pigmentiphaga; m, Aquabacterium; n, Nitrosomonadaceae; o, Delftia; p, Hydrogenophaga; q, Comamonadaceae; r, Naxibacter; s, Oxalobaceraceae; t, Nitrosomonas. For the complete list of discriminate taxa and ranks used to generate this cladogram, see Dataset S1.
Figure 2Microbial community succession.
Weighted UniFrac (a) and Bray-Curtis (b) distance principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of microbial communities among the forty consortia in the four treatments. The numbers accompanying the symbols represent the stages of enrichment culture. The directional development of the communities is indicated with arrows.
ANOSIM and permutational MANOVA of microbial diversity among different treatments in three phases.
| Phases | Bray–Curtis | weighted UniFrac | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANOSIM | ADONIS | ANOSIM | ADONIS | |||||
| R | R2 | R | R2 | |||||
| I | 0.068 | 0.297 | 0.278 | 0.412 | −0.028 | 0.576 | 0.287 | 0.341 |
| II | 0.722 | 0.001 | 0.490 | 0.001 | 0.677 | 0.001 | 0.578 | 0.001 |
| III | 0.951 | 0.001 | 0.760 | 0.001 | 0.889 | 0.001 | 0.819 | 0.002 |
Figure 3Pie charts of microbial composition at the OTU level for the 500 most abundant OTUs in the initial soil and the enriched consortia of the three phases of different treatments.
Figure 4Network of co-occurring bacterial genera based on correlation analysis.
A connection indicates a strong (Spearman’s ρ > 0.6) and significant (P < 0.01) correlation. The size of each node is proportional to the relative abundance; the color shade from dark-blue to yellow of each node is proportional to the number of connections (degree) from large to small, and the thickness of each connection between two nodes (edge) is proportional to the value of Spearman’s correlation coefficients.
Topological properties of co-occurring networks among different treatments.
| Treatment | Node | Edge | Modularity | Clustering coefficient | Average path length | Network diameter | Graph density | Average degree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C18 | 84 | 119 | 0.776 | 0.400 | 5.620 | 10 | 0.034 | 2.833 |
| PHE | 74 | 513 | 0.335 | 0.582 | 2.695 | 6 | 0.190 | 13.865 |
| PC | 56 | 95 | 0.753 | 0.469 | 4.119 | 9 | 0.062 | 3.393 |
| PCC | 55 | 203 | 0.429 | 0.540 | 2.762 | 6 | 0.137 | 7.382 |