Literature DB >> 26905533

On Diagnostic Accuracy in Audiology: Central Site of Lesion and Central Auditory Processing Disorder Studies.

Andrew J Vermiglio1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the field of audiology a test protocol (index test) is used to determine the presence or absence of a target condition. The value of an index test rests in its diagnostic accuracy. Results from an index test must be verified through the use of a reference standard. The clinician and researcher should determine the quality and applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) statement was published in response to the low quality of research conducted across many fields of study. It provides guidelines for the development and interpretation of diagnostic accuracy studies.
PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this article is to assess the degree to which the main principles of diagnostic accuracy studies are used for the detection of central auditory nervous system lesions and a central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). The secondary purpose is to compare the design of these studies to select key guidelines from the STARD statement. The third purpose of this article is to present an argument against the reassignment of diagnostic accuracy values of a particular index test for one target condition (e.g., a central site of lesion) to a different target condition (e.g., a CAPD).
RESULTS: A review of diagnostic accuracy literature on the detection of a central site of lesion reveals the use of a reference standard for the independent verification of the index test results. However, diagnostic accuracy studies involving index tests for the detection of a CAPD show that independent verification of index test results is nonexistent or at best questionable.
CONCLUSION: For a particular index test, while the diagnostic accuracy for detection of a central site of lesion may have been determined appropriately, it is inappropriate to reassign these diagnostic accuracy values to a different diagnostic target such as a CAPD. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26905533     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  4 in total

1.  Editorial: Auditory Processing Disorder.

Authors:  David R Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Effectiveness of the Auditory Temporal Ordering and Resolution Tests to Detect Central Auditory Processing Disorder in Adults With Evidence of Brain Pathology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sanathorn Chowsilpa; Doris-Eva Bamiou; Nehzat Koohi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Peripheral Auditory Involvement in Childhood Listening Difficulty.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Chelsea M Blankenship; Li Lin; Nicholette T Sloat; Audrey Perdew; Hannah Stewart; David R Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Same or Different: The Overlap Between Children With Auditory Processing Disorders and Children With Other Developmental Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ellen de Wit; Pim van Dijk; Sandra Hanekamp; Margot I Visser-Bochane; Bert Steenbergen; Cees P van der Schans; Margreet R Luinge
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.