Literature DB >> 26905317

Comparison of survival, safety, and efficacy after transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B-C hepatocellular cancer patients.

Cigdem Soydal1, Mustafa F Arslan, Ozlem N Kucuk, Ramazan Idilman, Sadik Bilgic.   

Abstract

AIM: This study aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) times, long-term complications, and recurrence rates of chemoembolization and radioembolization for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B-C hepatocellular cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 80 BCLC stage B-C hepatocellular cancer patients who received chemoembolization (group 1) or radioembolization (group 2). The OS times, long-term complications, and disease recurrence rates of the two groups were compared. The prognostic role of sex, age, presence of underlying chronic liver disease, BCLC stage, dimension and number of liver lesions, tumor load, and presence of extrahepatic disease were also analyzed for each group.
RESULTS: Each group included 40 (67 men, 13 women, mean age: 41.9±21.9 years) patients. During the follow-up period, 22 patients died in group 2 and 30 patients died in group 1. The overall mean survival of the entire patient group was calculated to be 37.31±3.94 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 30.46-44.1 months], with 30.63±3.68 months (95% CI, 23.42-37.84 months) for group 1 and 39.24±4.62 months (95% CI, 30.18-48.29 months) for group 2 (P=0.014). The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 72 versus 74% and 47 versus 59% for groups 2 and 1, respectively. There was no significant difference between the chronic complication (P=0.32) and disease recurrence (P=0.65) rates of the groups. Whereas the dimension of the largest lesion was the most significant predictor (P=0.01) in group 2, female sex (P=0.008), dimension of the largest lesion (P=0.03), and BCLC stage (P=0.01) were significant in group 1.
CONCLUSION: Although chemoembolization and radioembolization for BCLC Stage B-C patients have similar levels of safety and efficacy, they differ in OS. In this retrospective study, patients undergoing radioembolization had a longer survival rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26905317     DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  11 in total

Review 1.  Local Arterial Therapies in the Management of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Samdeep K Mouli; Laura W Goff
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-10-27

Review 2.  Position 2: Transarterial Radioembolization Should Be the Primary Locoregional Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Syed Irfan-Ur Rahman; Laura Nunez-Herrero; Jamie Lee Berkes
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-03-26

3.  Saudi Association for the Study of Liver diseases and Transplantation practice guidelines on the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Saleh A Alqahtani; Faisal M Sanai; Ashwaq Alolayan; Faisal Abaalkhail; Hamad Alsuhaibani; Mazen Hassanain; Waleed Alhazzani; Abdullah Alsuhaibani; Abdullah Algarni; Alejandro Forner; Richard S Finn; Waleed K Al-Hamoudi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.485

4.  Selective internal radiation therapies for unresectable early-, intermediate- or advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review, network meta-analysis and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Matthew Walton; Ros Wade; Lindsay Claxton; Sahar Sharif-Hurst; Melissa Harden; Jai Patel; Ian Rowe; Robert Hodgson; Alison Eastwood
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Nonsurgical management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  B M Meyers; J Knox; R Cosby; J R Beecroft; K K W Chan; N Coburn; J Feld; D Jonker; A Mahmud; J Ringash
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Efficacy and safety profile of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization by CalliSpheres® beads in Chinese hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Guan-Hui Zhou; Jun Han; Jun-Hui Sun; Yue-Lin Zhang; Tan-Yang Zhou; Chun-Hui Nie; Tong-Yin Zhu; Sheng-Qun Chen; Bao-Quan Wang; Zi-Niu Yu; Hong-Liang Wang; Li-Ming Chen; Wei-Lin Wang; Shu-Sen Zheng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Tongguo Si
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.248

Review 8.  Loco-Regional Treatments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in People Living with HIV.

Authors:  Cristina Micali; Ylenia Russotto; Grazia Caci; Manuela Ceccarelli; Andrea Marino; Benedetto Maurizio Celesia; Giovanni Francesco Pellicanò; Giuseppe Nunnari; Emmanuele Venanzi Rullo
Journal:  Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2022-01-07

Review 9.  Transarterial Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Joseph Ralph Kallini; Ahmed Gabr; Riad Salem; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Transcatheter embolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with epirubicin-loaded DC beads in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Guan-Hui Zhou; Jun-Hui Sun; Yue-Lin Zhang; Tan-Yang Zhou; Chun-Hui Nie; Tong-Yin Zhu; Jing Ai; Sheng-Qun Chen; Bao-Quan Wang; Zi-Niu Yu; Hong-Liang Wang; Li-Ming Wu; Li-Ming Chen; Shu-Sen Zheng
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.