Literature DB >> 26905052

Outcome of everolimus eluting bioabsorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) compared to non BVS drug eluting stent in the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) - A comparative study.

Rabin Chakraborty1, Soumya Patra2, Suvro Banerjee1, Arindam Pande1, Aftab Khan1, Prakash Chandra Mandol1, Debashish Ghosh1, Swapan Kumar De1, Sankha Subhro Das1, Raja Nag1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of everolimus eluting bioabsorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) in the management of "ST" segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are yet to be established. AIMS: To evaluate immediate and short term safety and efficacy of the everolimus-eluting ABSORB BVS compared with non BVS drug eluting stent (DES) in patients with STEMI.
METHODS: From December 2013 to December 2014, 220 patients with STEMI were included in this study. Among them, 35 patients treated with BVS were compared with a control group composed of 180 patients who underwent non BVS DES implantation in the same time period. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: stent thrombosis: death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target vessel/lesion revascularization) before discharge and up to six months was evaluated.
RESULTS: 1 vessel disease was more frequent whereas, 2 and 3 vessel disease was less frequent in BVS group. Procedural characteristics were also similar between groups, except for the use of post dilation (p=0.04). Procedural success, in-hospital, and up to six-month MACE rates were similar between both groups. Definite or probable stent thrombosis did not occur (according to the ARC criteria) in BVS patients, though two patients during the index admission and another two patients in the first month after DES implantation had stent thrombosis.
CONCLUSION: The use of the ABSORB BVS for STEMI is feasible and associated with good procedural safety, and angiographic success rate.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioabsorbable vascular scaffold; Drug eluting stent; Everolimus eluting; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26905052     DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med        ISSN: 1878-0938


  4 in total

1.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds-what does the future bring?

Authors:  Jacek Bil; Robert J Gil
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Korean Expert Panel Report.

Authors:  Jung Min Ahn; Duk Woo Park; Sung Jin Hong; Young Keun Ahn; Joo Yong Hahn; Won Jang Kim; Soon Jun Hong; Chang Wook Nam; Do Yoon Kang; Seung Yul Lee; Woo Jung Chun; Jung Ho Heo; Deok Kyu Cho; Jin Won Kim; Sung Ho Her; Sang Wook Kim; Sang Yong Yoo; Myeong Ki Hong; Seung Jea Tahk; Kee Sik Kim; Moo Hyun Kim; Yangsoo Jang; Seung Jung Park
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.243

3.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus metallic stent in percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the AIDA trial.

Authors:  Syed Raza Shah; Mazia Fatima; Amin Muhammad Dharani; Waqas Shahnawaz; Syed Arbab Shah
Journal:  J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect       Date:  2017-10-18

4.  Comparison of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the everolimus-eluting metallic stent in real-world patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Piotr Desperak; Michał Hawranek; Piotr A Chodór; Andrzej Świątkowski; Jacek Kowalczyk; Andrzej Lekston; Mariusz Gąsior
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 1.426

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.