| Literature DB >> 26904659 |
Balasubramanian Ganesan1, Silvana Martini2, Jonathan Solorio2, Marie K Walsh2.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of high intensity ultrasound (temperature, amplitude, and time) on the inactivation of indigenous bacteria in pasteurized milk, Bacillus atrophaeus spores inoculated into sterile milk, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae inoculated into sterile orange juice using response surface methodology. The variables investigated were sonication temperature (range from 0 to 84°C), amplitude (range from 0 to 216 μm), and time (range from 0.17 to 5 min) on the response, log microbe reduction. Data were analyzed by statistical analysis system software and three models were developed, each for bacteria, spore, and yeast reduction. Regression analysis identified sonication temperature and amplitude to be significant variables on microbe reduction. Optimization of the inactivation of microbes was found to be at 84.8°C, 216 μm amplitude, and 5.8 min. In addition, the predicted log reductions of microbes at common processing conditions (72°C for 20 sec) using 216 μm amplitude were computed. The experimental responses for bacteria, spore, and yeast reductions fell within the predicted levels, confirming the accuracy of the models.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26904659 PMCID: PMC4745508 DOI: 10.1155/2015/350719
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Food Sci ISSN: 2314-5765
The response surface experimental design and results for the log reductions of bacteria and spores in milk and yeast in orange juice.
| Run | Time (min) | Temp. (°C) | Amplitude ( | Actual log reduction bacteria | Actual log reduction spores | Actual log reduction yeast | Acoustic power in milk (W) | Acoustic power in juice (W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 41 | 216 | 3.37 | 1.89 | 3.4 | 6.19 | 5.82 |
| 2 | 3 | 41 | 0 | 0.64 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 1 | 10 | 180 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0 | 11.12 | 10.59 |
| 4 | 5 | 10 | 180 | 0.45 | 1.05 | 0 | 4.41 | 4.54 |
| 5 | 1 | 72 | 180 | 3.04 | 1.34 | 5.85 | 10.40 | 10.82 |
| 6 | 5 | 72 | 180 | 4.28 | 1.60 | 5.85 | 2.59 | 2.39 |
| 7 | 5 | 41 | 36 | 1.26 | 1.20 | 0.10 | 1.03 | 1.00 |
| 8 | 0.17 | 41 | 36 | 0.45 | 0.56 | 0.20 | 10.22 | 7.35 |
| 9 | 3 | 84 | 36 | 7.76 | 1.80 | 5.90 | 0.64 | 0.71 |
| 10 | 3 | 0 | 36 | 0.48 | 0.10 | 0 | 0.68 | 1.08 |
| 11 | 3 | 41 | 108 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.40 | 3.05 | 2.90 |
Estimated regression model of the relationship between response variable (Y 1) and independent variables (X 1, X 2, and X 3).
| Bacteria in milk | Spores in milk | Yeasts in OJ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Prob. > |
| Prob. > |
| Prob. > | |
|
| 3.84 | 0.0735 | 5.63 | 0.0352 | 0.18 | 0.6775 |
|
| 78.62 | 0.0001 | 53.58 | 0.0001 | 3622.7 | 0.0001 |
|
| 9.50 | 0.0095 | 59.02 | 0.0001 | 692.53 | 0.0001 |
|
| 0.28 | 0.6034 | 8.15 | 0.0145 | 1.06 | 0.3241 |
|
| 0.46 | 0.5086 | 0.12 | 0.7315 | 0.00 | 1.0000 |
|
| 1.87 | 0.1961 | 2.09 | 0.1741 | 0.18 | 0.6775 |
|
| 13.24 | 0.0034 | 10.51 | 0.0070 | 627.98 | 0.0001 |
|
| 0.025 | 0.8776 | 9.40 | 0.0098 | 106.64 | 0.0001 |
|
| 6.75 | 0.0233 | 4.28 | 0.0607 | 81.85 | 0.0001 |
X 1 = time (min), X 2 = temperature (°C), X 3 = amplitude, and Y 1 = log reduction.
Analysis of variance for the response surface quadratic model for log reductions of microbes.
| Bacteria in milk | Spores in milk | Yeast in orange juice | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Prob. > |
| Prob. > |
| Prob. > | |
| Model | 12.39 | 0.0001 | 15.83 | 0.0001 | 579.01 | 0.0001 |
| Linear | 30.66 | 0.0001 | 39.41 | 0.0001 | 1438.5 | 0.0001 |
| Quadratic | 5.75 | 0.0113 | 4.23 | 0.0295 | 262.92 | 0.0001 |
| Cross product | 1.61 | 0.5237 | 3.87 | 0.0379 | 35.61 | 0.0001 |
| Lack-of-fit | 12.40 | 0.1048 | 206.64 | 0.0901 | 15.92 | 0.1021 |
Figure 1Response surface plots showing the optimization of sonication temperature and amplitude on the log reduction of indigenous bacteria (Y 1) in milk (a), the log reduction of inoculated Bacillus atrophaeus spores (Y 1) in milk (b), and the log reduction of inoculated S. cerevisiae (Y 1) in orange juice (c).
The predicted mathematical models for bacteria, spore, and yeast reduction after ultrasound treatment.
| Microorganism | Polynomial |
|---|---|
| Bacteria in milk | −0.85514 − 0.013031∗ |
| Spores in milk | −0.13737 − 0.14663∗ |
| Yeast in orange juice | 0.491926 + 2.496654∗ |
X 1 = time (min), X 2 = temperature (°C), and X 3 = amplitude.
Comparison of the predicted and actual log microbial reductions in milk and juice attemperatures and times listed (all samples were run at 216 μm amplitude).
| Time (min) | Temp. (°C) | Predicted log reduction | Actual log |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indigenous thermophilic bacteria in milk | |||
| 5.8 | 84.8 | 15 (12.2, 17.95) | 6.541 |
| 0.17 (10.2 sec) | 72 | 5.85 (3.20, 8.51) | 5.24 |
| 0.33 (20 sec) | 72 | 5.85 (3.24, 8.47) | 5.39 |
|
| |||
| Spores in milk | |||
| 5.8 | 84.8 | 2.29 (1.52, 3.07) | 2.01 |
| 0.17 (10.2 sec) | 72 | 1.66 (1.09, 2.23) | 1.56 |
| 0.33 (20 sec) | 72 | 1.68 (1.17, 2.11) | 1.66 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| 5.8 | 84.8 | 9.42 (9.12, 9.72) | 6.571 |
| 0.17 (10.2 sec) | 72 | 6.72 (6.49, 6.94) | 6.561 |
| 0.33 (20 sec) | 72 | 6.72 (6.49, 6.94) | 6.571 |
1The reduction represents the maximum amount of microbes in the sample.