| Literature DB >> 26904605 |
Rolando José González1, Elena Pastor Cavada2, Javier Vioque Peña2, Roberto Luis Torres1, Dardo Mario De Greef1, Silvina Rosa Drago3.
Abstract
The utilization of whole grains in food formulations is nowadays recommended. Extrusion cooking allows obtaining precooked cereal products and a wide range of ready-to-eat foods. Two rice varieties having different amylose content (Fortuna 16% and Paso 144, 27%) were extruded using a Brabender single screw extruder. Factorial experimental design was used to study the effects of extrusion temperature (160, 175, and 190°C) and grits moisture content (14%, 16.5%, and 19%) on extrudate properties. Specific mechanical energy consumption (SMEC), radial expansion (E), specific volume (SV), water absorption (WA), and solubility (S) were determined on each extrudate sample. In general, Fortuna variety showed higher values of SMEC and S (703-409 versus 637-407 J/g; 33.0-21.0 versus 20.1-11.0%, resp.) than those of Paso 144; on the contrary SV (8.64-3.47 versus 8.27-4.53 mL/g) and WA tended to be lower (7.7-5.1 versus 8.4-6.6 mL/g). Both varieties showed similar values of expansion rate (3.60-2.18). Physical characteristics depended on extrusion conditions and rice variety used. The degree of cooking reached by Paso rice samples was lower than that obtained for Fortuna. It is suggested that the presence of germ and bran interfered with the cooking process, decreasing friction level and broadening residence time distribution.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 26904605 PMCID: PMC4745535 DOI: 10.1155/2013/584148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Food Sci ISSN: 2314-5765
Composition of raw rice∗∗.
| Sample | Proteins∗ | Ash∗ | Moisture | Lipids (ether extract)∗ | Total Dietary Fibre∗ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fortuna | 71.5 ± 2.0 | 11.8 ± 0.4 | 118.6 ± 1.2 | 19.8 ± 0.3 | 52.7 ± 1.7 |
| Paso | 75.9 ± 0.9 | 15.0 ± 0.1 | 115.7 ± 0.7 | 23.6 ± 0.4 | 55.3 ± 1.7 |
*Dry base; ∗∗average ± SD.
Specific mechanical energy consumption (SMEC), expansion (E), specific volume (SV), water absorption (WA), and solubility (S%) corresponding to the eleven experimental extruded samples and for the two rice varieties.
| Extrusion conditions | SMEC (J/g) |
| SV (mL/g) | WA (mL/g) |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 703 | 637 | 3.36 | 3.46 | 5.39 | 7.26 | 5.1 | 6.6 | 33.0 | 20.1 |
|
|
| 671 | 590 | 3.38 | 3.50 | 6.52 | 8.27 | 5.9 | 8.4 | 30.8 | 17.0 |
|
|
| 620 | 493 | 3.36 | 3.42 | 8.64 | 7.89 | 6,5 | 7.9 | 31.9 | 17.5 |
|
|
| 609 | 585 | 3.60 | 3.40 | 5.43 | 6.12 | 5.7 | 6.9 | 24.9 | 19.5 |
|
|
| 547 | 575 | 3.14 | 3.01 | 5.22 | 6.65 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 23.4 | 13.5 |
|
|
| 534 | 543 | 3.03 | 3.16 | 5.65 | 6.98 | 7.3 | 7.3 | 23.3 | 12.1 |
|
|
| 541 | 566 | 3.12 | 3.17 | 5.29 | 6.90 | 7.2 | 7.22 | 25.8 | 12.9 |
|
|
| 541 | 483 | 2.89 | 2.95 | 7.23 | 7.83 | 7.0 | 8.3 | 27.5 | 17.2 |
|
|
| 483 | 511 | 2.55 | 2.92 | 3.47 | 4.53 | 6.0 | 7.6 | 21.5 | 14.8 |
|
|
| 462 | 501 | 2.77 | 2.76 | 4.29 | 5.39 | 7.2 | 7.0 | 21.0 | 11.1 |
|
|
| 409 | 407 | 2.46 | 2.18 | 5.94 | 5.84 | 7.7 | 8.1 | 26.1 | 15.5 |
M: moisture; T: temperature; F: Fortuna rice variety; P: Paso 144 rice variety.
Degrees of significance (P value) of each term of the regression model (source of variation), corresponding to each response and for the two rice varieties.
| Source of variation | SMEC |
| SV | WA |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.6779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.2554 | 0.1337 |
|
| 0.7563 | 0.2007 |
|
| 0.2361 | 0.0968 |
| 0.2160 | 0.3121 | 0.7205 |
|
| 0.5381 | 0.3411 | 0.5534 | 0.5534 | 0.2331 | 0.1886 | 0.5534 | 0.1270 | 0.2171 | 0.1510 |
|
| 0.1403 | 0.0978 | 0.9086 | 0.9086 |
| 0.2467 | 0.9086 | 0.8320 | 0.2432 |
|
| Lack of Fit | 0.0794 | 0.7997 | 0.0515 | 0.0515 | 0.2398 | 0.1593 | 0.0515 |
| 0.8966 | 0.1951 |
M: moisture; T: temperature; F: Fortuna rice variety; P: Paso 144 rice variety; specific mechanical energy consumption (SMEC); expansion (E); specific volume (SV); water absorption (WA); and solubility (S%).
Figure 1Surface response for SMEC corresponding to Fortuna rice variety (a) and Paso 144 rice variety (b).
Figure 2Surface response for expansion corresponding to Fortuna rice variety (a) and Paso 144 rice variety (b).
Figure 3Surface response for specific volume (SV) corresponding to Fortuna rice variety (a) and Paso 144 rice variety (b).
Figure 4Surface response for water absorption corresponding to Fortuna rice variety.
Figure 5Surface response for solubility corresponding to Fortuna rice (a) and Paso 144 rice variety (b).
Power law parameters (k and n), regression coefficient (r), and viscosity at 135 s−1 (Pa·s−1), corresponding to flour dispersion at 8% and 11% solid concentration and for each rice varieties.
| Sample | W/W % |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fortuna | 8 | 0 | 0,436 | 0,497 | 0,9948 | 0,037 |
| 11,0 | 4,5 | 1,053 | 0,636 | 0,9999 | 0,210 | |
| Paso | 8 | 0 | 0,686 | 0,433 | 0,9994 | 0,042 |
| 11,0 | 7,2 | 3,670 | 0,550 | 0,9988 | 0,451 |