Literature DB >> 26903599

Defining the non-vulnerable and vulnerable patients with computed tomography coronary angiography: evaluation of atherosclerotic plaque burden and composition.

Gaston A Rodriguez-Granillo1, Patricia Carrascosa2, Nico Bruining3, Ron Waksman4, Hector M Garcia-Garcia5.   

Abstract

The shift from coronary plaque stability to plaque instability remains poorly understood despite enormous efforts and expenditures have been assigned to the study of the subject. On the other hand, there have been serious advances in imaging helping us to characterizenon-vulnerable patients The latter has much more value in the clinical decision-making process since it provides high certainty that the patient's probability of a future acute event is low and treatment decisions should be made accordingly. Although coronary plaque rupture is still recognized as the main source of acute thrombotic events, numerous studies have shown that the prediction of events on an individual basis is far more complex and demands a more open approach aimed at characterizing patient risk rather than assessing the risk of thrombosis of a single plaque. Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) has the ability to evaluate non-invasively the extent, burden, severity, and characteristics of coronary artery disease (CAD) and has a close relationship to intravascular ultrasound. On the basis of an excellent negative predictive value with an annualized event rate of ∼0.20% assessed over more than 6000 patients, thus providing a 5-year warranty period, CTCA has been identified as the finest non-invasive tool to exclude CAD. This means that CTCA is able to reliably characterize the non-vulnerable patient. Conversely, in the past few years, several studies have attempted to establish CTCA-derived predictors of acute coronary syndromes, both from a lesion level and a patient level basis with very low positive predictive value, thus questioning the vulnerable patient/plaque concept. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2016. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atherosclerosis; computed tomography; coronary; imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26903599     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jew012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  10 in total

1.  Invasive coronary angiography findings across the CAD-RADS classification spectrum.

Authors:  Gaston A Rodriguez-Granillo; Patricia Carrascosa; Alejandro Goldsmit; Armin Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Emerging Role of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Lipid-Lowering Therapy: a Bridge to Image-Guided Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Toru Miyoshi; Kazuhiro Osawa; Keishi Ichikawa; Kazuki Suruga; Takashi Miki; Masashi Yoshida; Koji Nakagawa; Hironobu Toda; Kazufumi Nakamura; Hiroshi Morita; Hiroshi Ito
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Impact of plaque characteristics on the degree of functional stenosis.

Authors:  Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves; Alexandre Hideo-Kajita; Hector Manuel Garcia-Garcia
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

Review 4.  Extraction of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques From Computed Tomography Imaging: A Review of Recent Methods.

Authors:  Haipeng Liu; Aleksandra Wingert; Jian'an Wang; Jucheng Zhang; Xinhong Wang; Jianzhong Sun; Fei Chen; Syed Ghufran Khalid; Jun Jiang; Dingchang Zheng
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-02-10

Review 5.  Coronary Atherosclerotic Vulnerable Plaque: Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Christodoulos Stefanadis; Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou; Dimitrios Tsiachris; Panagiota Pietri
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  High-risk coronary plaque in SLE: low-attenuation non-calcified coronary plaque and positive remodelling index.

Authors:  George Stojan; Jessica Li; Matthew Budoff; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Michelle A Petri
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2020-07

7.  Carotid artery calcification score and its association with cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Zhou Chu; Liu Cheng; Qiao Tong
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 8.  The Role of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in Arterial Remodeling: Focus on Calcification-Related Processes.

Authors:  Armand Jaminon; Koen Reesink; Abraham Kroon; Leon Schurgers
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Added Value of CCTA-Derived Features to Predict MACEs in Stable Patients Undergoing Coronary Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Valeria Pergola; Giulio Cabrelle; Giulia Mattesi; Simone Cattarin; Antonio Furlan; Carlo Maria Dellino; Saverio Continisio; Carolina Montonati; Adelaide Giorgino; Chiara Giraudo; Loira Leoni; Riccardo Bariani; Giulio Barbiero; Barbara Bauce; Donato Mele; Martina Perazzolo Marra; Giorgio De Conti; Sabino Iliceto; Raffaella Motta
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-12

10.  The central role of CT coronary angiography in postcardiac arrest care in the young adult.

Authors:  Ayisha Mehtab Khan-Kheil; Alexandra Sophie Moss; Leanne Stephens; Jamal Nasir Khan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-12-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.