| Literature DB >> 26903110 |
Can Xu1,2, Yuting Sun2, Jian Gao2, Tian Qiu3, Zhigang Zheng1, Shuguang Guan3.
Abstract
Recently, the first-order synchronization transition has been studied in systems of coupled phase oscillators. In this paper, we propose a framework to investigate the synchronization in the frequency-weighted Kuramoto model with all-to-all couplings. A rigorous mean-field analysis is implemented to predict the possible steady states. Furthermore, a detailed linear stability analysis proves that the incoherent state is only neutrally stable below the synchronization threshold. Nevertheless, interestingly, the amplitude of the order parameter decays exponentially (at least for short time) in this regime, resembling the Landau damping effect in plasma physics. Moreover, the explicit expression for the critical coupling strength is determined by both the mean-field method and linear operator theory. The mechanism of bifurcation for the incoherent state near the critical point is further revealed by the amplitude expansion theory, which shows that the oscillating standing wave state could also occur in this model for certain frequency distributions. Our theoretical analysis and numerical results are consistent with each other, which can help us understand the synchronization transition in general networks with heterogeneous couplings.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26903110 PMCID: PMC4763290 DOI: 10.1038/srep21926
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Summary of the frequency distributions, the balance equations, the critical mean-field frequencies Ω , and the critical coupling strength K .
| frequency distribution | balance equation | Ω | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0, | |||
| 0, ±0.40 | 2.65 | ||
| 0, ±0.47 | 2.34 | ||
| 0, ± | 4 |
From top to bottom: the uniform distribution, the triangle distribution, the parabolic distribution, and the Lorentzian distribution.
Figure 1Different scenarios of the decay of R(t) with different frequency distributions and coupling strength below the critical threshold (K < K).
(a–c) Uniform distribution , . K = 0, 1.6, 1.78, respectively. (d–f) Triangle distribution , . K = 0, 2.2, 2.6, respectively. (g–i) Lorentzian distribution , . K = 0, 3.7, 3.9, respectively. The red solid lines denote the fitted curves of the envelopes which all satisfy the exponential form e.
Figure 2Characterizing various coherent states in the phase diagram.
R [long time average of R(t)] vs. K for the uniform frequency distribution , . Branches 1 − −5 are the incoherent state, the (unstable) traveling wave state predicted by the mean-field theory, the standing wave state, the unstable and the stable two-cluster synchronous states, respectively. The blue and red lines denote the forward and the backward transitions, respectively. In both directions, K is changed adiabatically in simulations. There is a hysteresis region of the standing wave solution within K = 1.725 − 1.8. In the simulations oscillators number N = 50,000, and a fourth-order Runge-Kutta integration method with time step 0.01 is used.