| Literature DB >> 26903041 |
Z Y Yuan1,2, F Jiao1,2, Y H Li3, Robert L Kallenbach4.
Abstract
Although anthropogenic disturbances are often perceived as detrimental to plant biodiversity, the relationship between biodiversity and disturbance remains unclear. Opinions diverge on how natural diversity is generated and maintained. We conducted a large-scale investigation of a temperate grassland system in Inner Mongolia and assessed the richness-disturbance relationship using grazing intensity, the primary anthropogenic disturbance in the region. Vascular plant-species richness peaked at an intermediate level of anthropogenic disturbance. Our results support the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis, which provides a valid and useful measure of biodiversity at a metacommunity scale, indicating that anthropogenic disturbances are necessary to conserve the biodiversity of grassland systems.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26903041 PMCID: PMC4763272 DOI: 10.1038/srep22132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Relationships between species richness and disturbance.
The relationships are best described by non-linear regression (quadratic models, dark grey lines). Grey shade refers to Loess smoothing with 95% confidence intervals.
Parameters estimated by standard Poisson regression.
| Coefficient | Estimate | Std. error | z value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAT | 0.179 | 0.151 | 1.190 | 0.235 |
| MAP | 0.007 | 0.007 | 1.070 | 0.286 |
| Human density | 0.028 | 0.007 | 3.880 | <0.001 |
| Livestock intensity | 0.001 | <0.001 | 3.350 | <0.001 |
MAT and MAP stand for mean annual temperature and precipitation, respectively.
Whole-model R 2 values for multiple regression analyses of biomass and diversity in a series of models with increasing numbers of independent variables.
| Model | Biomass | Richness | Shannon | Simpson |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latitude | 0.024ns | 0.067* | 0.036ns | 0.004ns |
| MAT | 0.005ns | 0.013ns | 0.002ns | 0.009ns |
| MAP | 0.136*** | 0.131*** | 0.083* | 0.047ns |
| MAT & MAP | 0.168* | 0.173* | 0.143* | 0.113ns |
| Human density | 0.227*** | 0.562*** | 0.249*** | 0.142** |
| Livestock density | 0.178*** | 0.497*** | 0.285*** | 0.179*** |
| Human & livestock | 0.267*** | 0.582*** | 0.263*** | 0.192* |
| Climate + disturbance | 0.311*** | 0.623*** | 0.386*** | 0.355*** |
Overall model significance is: ns (not significant, P > 0.05), *(P < 0.05), **(P < 0.01) or ***(P < 0.001). The ‘Climate’ models include mean annual temperature (MAT) and mean annual precipitation (MAP). The ‘Disturbance’ models include densities of humans and livestock. The ‘Climate + disturbance’ models include the two sets combined.
Figure 2Relationships between species richness and biomass of annual and unpalatable plants.
The relationships are best described by non-linear regression (quadratic models, dark grey lines). Grey shade refers to Loess smoothing with 95% confidence intervals.