Literature DB >> 26903039

Sex-Specific Differences at Presentation and Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Cohort Study.

Susheel Kodali, Mathew R Williams, Darshan Doshi, Rebecca T Hahn, Karin H Humphries, Vuyisile T Nkomo, David J Cohen, Pamela S Douglas, Michael Mack, Ke Xu, Lars Svensson, Vinod H Thourani, E Murat Tuzcu, Neil J Weissman, Martin Leon, Ajay J Kirtane.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Female sex is associated with poorer outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Data on sex-specific differences after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are conflicting.
OBJECTIVE: To examine sex-specific differences in patients undergoing TAVR in the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) trial.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the randomized and nonrandomized portions of the PARTNER trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00530894).
SETTING: 25 hospitals in the United States, Canada, and Germany. PATIENTS: High-risk and inoperable patients (1220 women and 1339 men). INTERVENTION: TAVR. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic characteristics, cardiac and noncardiac comorbidities, mortality, stroke, rehospitalization, vascular complications, bleeding complications, and echocardiographic valve parameters.
RESULTS: At baseline, women had lower rates of hyperlipidemia, diabetes, smoking, and renal disease but higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality scores (11.9% vs. 11.1%; P < 0.001). After TAVR, women had more vascular complications (17.3% vs. 10.0%; difference, 7.29 percentage points [95% CI, 4.63 to 9.95 percentage points]; P < 0.001) and major bleeding (10.5% vs. 7.7%; difference, 2.8 percentage points [CI, 0.57 to 5.04 percentage points]; P = 0.012) but less frequent moderate and severe paravalvular regurgitation (6.0% vs. 14.3%; difference, -8.3 percentage points [CI, -11.7 to -5.0 percentage points]; P < 0.001). At 30 days, the unadjusted all-cause mortality rate (6.5% vs. 5.9%; difference, 0.6 percentage point [CI, -1.29 to 2.45 percentage points]; P = 0.52) and stroke incidence (3.8% vs. 3.0%; difference, 0.8 percentage point [CI, -0.62 to 2.19 percentage points]; P = 0.28) were similar. At 1 year, all-cause mortality was significantly lower in women than in men (19.0% vs. 25.9%; hazard ratio, 0.72 [CI, 0.61 to 0.85]; P < 0.001). LIMITATION: Secondary analysis that included nonrandomized trial data.
CONCLUSION: Despite a higher incidence of vascular and bleeding complications, women having TAVR had lower mortality than men at 1 year. Thus, sex-specific risk in TAVR is the opposite of that in SAVR, for which female sex has been shown to be independently associated with an adverse prognosis. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Edwards Lifesciences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26903039     DOI: 10.7326/M15-0121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   51.598


  12 in total

1.  Outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a sex-based story of success?

Authors:  René Vollenbroich
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-09

2.  Sex differences in outcomes with transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Feng Qian; Edward L Hannan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-08

Review 3.  Sex differences in the brain: Implications for behavioral and biomedical research.

Authors:  Elena Choleris; Liisa A M Galea; Farida Sohrabji; Karyn M Frick
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  Sex-Specific Considerations in Women with Aortic Stenosis and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Christos G Mihos; Sheila L Klassen; Evin Yucel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-06-19

Review 5.  Access Options for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Unfavorable Aortoiliofemoral Anatomy.

Authors:  Jayendrakumar S Patel; Amar Krishnaswamy; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; Stephanie Mick; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in women.

Authors:  Dipti Itchhaporia
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacements alter circulating serum factors to mediate myofibroblast deactivation.

Authors:  Brian A Aguado; Katherine B Schuetze; Joseph C Grim; Cierra J Walker; Anne C Cox; Tova L Ceccato; Aik-Choon Tan; Carmen C Sucharov; Leslie A Leinwand; Matthew R G Taylor; Timothy A McKinsey; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 19.319

8.  Women had favourable reverse left ventricle remodelling after TAVR.

Authors:  Su-Chan Chen; Hsin-Bang Leu; Hsiao-Huang Chang; I-Ming Chen; Po-Lin Chen; Su-Man Lin; Ying-Hwa Chen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.686

9.  Risk factors for worsening renal function and their association with long-term mortality following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: data from the SWEDEHEART registry.

Authors:  Georgios Vavilis; Marie Evans; Tomas Jernberg; Andreas Rück; Karolina Szummer
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2017-06-12

10.  Evolution of transcatheter aortic valve implantation over 7 years: results of a prospective single-centre registry of 2000 patients in a large municipal hospital (TAVIK Registry).

Authors:  Gerhard Schymik; Valentin Herzberger; Jens Bergmann; Peter Bramlage; Lars O Conzelmann; Alexander Würth; Armin Luik; Holger Schröfel; Panagiotis Tzamalis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.