Thomas M Dunn1,2, Josh Gibbs3, Noelle Whitney3, Amy Starosta4. 1. School of Psychological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Campus Box 94, Greeley, CO, 80639-0094, USA. thomas.dunn@unco.edu. 2. Behavioral Health Service, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, USA. thomas.dunn@unco.edu. 3. School of Psychological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Campus Box 94, Greeley, CO, 80639-0094, USA. 4. Behavioral Health Service, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Orthorexia nervosa, or pathological dieting based on being "healthy," has been of growing interest. Clinical data are limited to less than a half-dozen case studies reporting instances of medical problems due to healthful eating. However, more than a dozen studies using a measure to identify orthorexia, the ORTO-15, report very high prevalence rates in non-clinical samples. Point prevalence rates are reported from 6 % to nearly 90 %. Such variability could be due to cultural issues or psychometric problems with the instrument. This study examines prevalence rate of orthorexia in a US sample. METHOD: The ORTO-15 was administered to 275 US college students along with other questions regarding diet, exercise, and health. RESULTS: While the ORTO-15 indicated a prevalence rate of 71 %, only 20 % of the sample endorsed a dietary practice of removing a particular food type (e.g. meat) from their diet. Those who endorsed following a vegan diet had the highest (less pathological) mean ORTO-15 score. Further, when classifying participants based on their seriousness about healthy eating and whether their diet had led to impairment in everyday activities and medical problems, less than 1 % of the sample fell into such a category. CONCLUSION: As in other countries, a large proportion of a non-clinical US sample scored in the orthorexia range on the ORTO-15. However, this instrument is likely unable to distinguish between healthy eating and pathologically healthful eating. Our estimate is that orthorexia nervosa like anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, is not a common condition.
PURPOSE:Orthorexia nervosa, or pathological dieting based on being "healthy," has been of growing interest. Clinical data are limited to less than a half-dozen case studies reporting instances of medical problems due to healthful eating. However, more than a dozen studies using a measure to identify orthorexia, the ORTO-15, report very high prevalence rates in non-clinical samples. Point prevalence rates are reported from 6 % to nearly 90 %. Such variability could be due to cultural issues or psychometric problems with the instrument. This study examines prevalence rate of orthorexia in a US sample. METHOD: The ORTO-15 was administered to 275 US college students along with other questions regarding diet, exercise, and health. RESULTS: While the ORTO-15 indicated a prevalence rate of 71 %, only 20 % of the sample endorsed a dietary practice of removing a particular food type (e.g. meat) from their diet. Those who endorsed following a vegan diet had the highest (less pathological) mean ORTO-15 score. Further, when classifying participants based on their seriousness about healthy eating and whether their diet had led to impairment in everyday activities and medical problems, less than 1 % of the sample fell into such a category. CONCLUSION: As in other countries, a large proportion of a non-clinical US sample scored in the orthorexia range on the ORTO-15. However, this instrument is likely unable to distinguish between healthy eating and pathologically healthful eating. Our estimate is that orthorexia nervosa like anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, is not a common condition.
Authors: C Segura-García; M C Papaianni; F Caglioti; L Procopio; C G Nisticò; L Bombardiere; A Ammendolia; P Rizza; P De Fazio; L Capranica Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Márta Varga; Barna Konkolÿ Thege; Szilvia Dukay-Szabó; Ferenc Túry; Eric F van Furth Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: María Laura Parra-Fernandez; Teresa Rodríguez-Cano; Maria José Perez-Haro; María Dolores Onieva-Zafra; Elia Fernandez-Martinez; Blanca Notario-Pacheco Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2018-09-08 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: L Dell'Osso; Barbara Carpita; D Muti; I M Cremone; G Massimetti; E Diadema; C Gesi; C Carmassi Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Anna Brytek-Matera; Maria Luisa Fonte; Eleonora Poggiogalle; Lorenzo Maria Donini; Hellas Cena Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 4.652