Literature DB >> 26902618

Surgical margin-negative endoscopic mucosal resection with simple three-clipping technique: a randomized prospective study (with video).

Hirohito Mori1,2, Hideki Kobara3, Noriko Nishiyama3, Shintaro Fujihara3, Nobuya Kobayashi3, Maki Ayaki3, Tsutomu Masaki3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although endoscopic mucosal resection is an established colorectal polyp treatment, local recurrence occurs in 13 % of cases due to inadequate snaring. We evaluated whether pre-clipping to the muscularis propria resulted in resected specimens with negative surgical margins without thermal denaturation.
METHODS: Of 245 polyps from 114 patients with colorectal polyps under 20 mm, we included 188 polyps from 81 patients. We randomly allocated polyps to the conventional injection group (CG) (97 polyps) or the pre-clipping injection group (PG) (91 polyps). The PG received three-point pre-clipping to ensure ample gripping to the muscle layer on the oral and both sides of the tumor with 4 mL local injection. Endoscopic ultrasonography was performed to measure the resulting bulge. Outcomes included the number of instances of thermal denaturation of the horizontal/vertical margin (HMX/VMX) or positive horizontal/vertical margins (HM+/VM+), the shortest distance from tumor margins to resected edges, and the maximum bulge distances from tumor surface to the muscularis propria.
RESULTS: The numbers of HMX and HM+ in the CG and PG were 27 and 6, and 9 and 2 (P = 0.001), and VMX and VM+ were 8 and 5, and 0 and 0 (P = 0.057). The shortest distance from tumor margin to resected edge [median (range), mm] in polyps in the CG and PG was 0.6 (0-2.7) and 4.7 (2.1-8.9) (P = 0.018). The maximum bulge distances were 4.6 (3.0-8.0) and 11.0 (6.8-17.0) (P = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-clipping enabled surgical margin-negative resection without thermal denaturation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic mucosal resection; Local recurrence; Pre-clipping; Surgical margin-negative; Thermal denaturation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26902618     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4816-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of narrowed spectrum endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging, and confocal laser endomicroscopy for optical diagnosis of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Linda K Wanders; James E East; Sanne E Uitentuis; Mariska M G Leeflang; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Local recurrence of colorectal tumors after endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  M Fujita; O Tsuruta; H Ikeda; A Toyonaga; K Tanikawa
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 3.  Indications and Techniques for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Authors:  Amit Bhatt; Seiichiro Abe; Arthi Kumaravel; John Vargo; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Promoter methylation status of hMLH1, hMSH2, and MGMT genes in colorectal cancer associated with adenoma-carcinoma sequence.

Authors:  Kyung-Hwa Lee; Ji-Shin Lee; Jong-Hee Nam; Chan Choi; Min-Cheol Lee; Chang-Soo Park; Sang-Woo Juhng; Jae-Hyuk Lee
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Colorectal ESD: current indications and latest technical advances.

Authors:  Yutaka Saito; Taku Sakamoto; Takeshi Nakajima; Takahisa Matsuda
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2014-02-13

6.  Endoscopic treatment for laterally spreading tumors in the colon.

Authors:  Y Saito; T Fujii; H Kondo; H Mukai; T Yokota; T Kozu; D Saito
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 7.  Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Mikihiro Fujiya; Kazuyuki Tanaka; Tatsuya Dokoshi; Motoya Tominaga; Nobuhiro Ueno; Yuhei Inaba; Takahiro Ito; Kentaro Moriichi; Yutaka Kohgo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Hiroshi Kashida; Yutaka Saito; Naohisa Yahagi; Hiroo Yamano; Shoichi Saito; Takashi Hisabe; Takashi Yao; Masahiko Watanabe; Masahiro Yoshida; Shin-Ei Kudo; Osamu Tsuruta; Ken-Ichi Sugihara; Toshiaki Watanabe; Yusuke Saitoh; Masahiro Igarashi; Takashi Toyonaga; Yoichi Ajioka; Masao Ichinose; Toshiyuki Matsui; Akira Sugita; Kentaro Sugano; Kazuma Fujimoto; Hisao Tajiri
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 7.559

Review 9.  Endoscopic resection: when is EMR/ESD sufficient?

Authors:  H Messmann
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2014

10.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps: prospective evaluation of recurrence and complications.

Authors:  Rita Carvalho; Miguel Areia; Daniel Brito; Sandra Saraiva; Susana Alves; Ana Teresa Cadime
Journal:  Acta Gastroenterol Belg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.