Literature DB >> 26902201

[Effects of β-blockers in patients with septic shock: a meta analysis].

Y W Yu1, T W Sun, Y D Wan, Z Q Liu, Q C Kan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of β-blockers in patients with septic shock.
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane central registration of controlled trials, CNKI and Wanfang Data were searched to identify relevant studies from inception to October 2015.Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 12.0.The random effects model was used due to wide clinical variability across the trials.
RESULTS: After application of the inclusion criteria, 7 trials with 392 patients were included, involving 3 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 4 quasi-experiments.The results of the meta-analysis for the quasi-experiments showed that compared with baseline, heart rates (standardized mean difference (SMD)=-2.51, 95%CI: -4.32--0.70, P=0.007) and lactate levels (SMD=-0.34, 95%CI: -0.67--0.02, P=0.039) significantly decreased, while no significant differences were seen for mean arterial pressure (SMD=0.01, 95%CI: -0.42-0.44, P=0.969), cardiac index (SMD=-0.35, 95%CI: -1.15-0.44, P=0.385) or norepinephrine requirements (SMD=-0.06, 95%CI: -0.38-0.27, P=0.726) after 24-hour therapy. Among randomized controlled trials, β-blockers, compared with standard care, was associated with reductions in heart rates (P<0.001) , 28-day mortality (RR=0.60, 95%CI: 0.48-0.75, P<0.001) and troponin I levels (P<0.001). While no differences were found between the two groups in other hemodynamic and cardiac function variables, such as mean arterial pressure, cardiac index or stroke volume index (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The currently available evidence indicates that the use of β-blockers is associated with a significant decrease in heart rate, troponin I levels and 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock, while mean arterial pressure, cardiac index and stroke volume index might remain unchanged.Large scale, muti-center RCTs need to be carried out to confirm the effects of β-blockers in patients with septic shock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26902201     DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi        ISSN: 0376-2491


  2 in total

1.  Benefits of esmolol in adults with sepsis and septic shock: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Chun Chen; Yi Liu; Yi Yang; Xiaolei Yang; Jin Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 2.  The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Po Huang; Xiangchun Zheng; Zhi Liu; Xiaolei Fang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 5.810

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.