Joel W Lewin1, Nicholas A O'Rourke2, Adrian K H Chiow3, Richard Bryant4, Ian Martin5, Leslie K Nathanson6, David J Cavallucci2. 1. Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Australia. Electronic address: joel.lewin@uqconnect.edu.au. 2. Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Australia; General Surgery, The Wesley Hospital, Australia. 3. Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Australia. 4. Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Australia; General Surgery, Holy Spirit Northside Hospital, Australia. 5. General Surgery, The Wesley Hospital, Australia. 6. General Surgery, The Wesley Hospital, Australia; General Surgery, Holy Spirit Northside Hospital, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study compares long-term outcomes between intention-to-treat laparoscopic and open approaches to colorectal liver metastases (CLM), using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores to control for selection bias. METHOD: Patients undergoing liver resection for CLM by 5 surgeons at 3 institutions from 2000 to early 2014 were analysed. IPTW based on propensity scores were generated and used to assess the marginal treatment effect of the laparoscopic approach via a weighted Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 298 operations were performed in 256 patients. 7 patients with planned two-stage resections were excluded leaving 284 operations in 249 patients for analysis. After IPTW, the population was well balanced. With a median follow up of 36 months, 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for the cohort were 59% and 38%. 146 laparoscopic procedures were performed in 140 patients, with weighted 5-year OS and RFS of 54% and 36% respectively. In the open group, 138 procedures were performed in 122 patients, with a weighted 5-year OS and RFS of 63% and 38% respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of OS or RFS. CONCLUSION: In the Brisbane experience, after accounting for bias in treatment assignment, long term survival after LLR for CLM is equivalent to outcomes in open surgery. Crown
BACKGROUND: This study compares long-term outcomes between intention-to-treat laparoscopic and open approaches to colorectal liver metastases (CLM), using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores to control for selection bias. METHOD:Patients undergoing liver resection for CLM by 5 surgeons at 3 institutions from 2000 to early 2014 were analysed. IPTW based on propensity scores were generated and used to assess the marginal treatment effect of the laparoscopic approach via a weighted Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 298 operations were performed in 256 patients. 7 patients with planned two-stage resections were excluded leaving 284 operations in 249 patients for analysis. After IPTW, the population was well balanced. With a median follow up of 36 months, 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for the cohort were 59% and 38%. 146 laparoscopic procedures were performed in 140 patients, with weighted 5-year OS and RFS of 54% and 36% respectively. In the open group, 138 procedures were performed in 122 patients, with a weighted 5-year OS and RFS of 63% and 38% respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of OS or RFS. CONCLUSION: In the Brisbane experience, after accounting for bias in treatment assignment, long term survival after LLR for CLM is equivalent to outcomes in open surgery. Crown
Authors: Ibrahim Dagher; Brice Gayet; Dimitrios Tzanis; Hadrien Tranchart; David Fuks; Olivier Soubrane; Ho-Seong Han; Ki-Hun Kim; Daniel Cherqui; Nicholas O'Rourke; Roberto I Troisi; Luca Aldrighetti; Edwin Bjorn; Mohammed Abu Hilal; Giulio Belli; Hironori Kaneko; William R Jarnagin; Charles Lin; Juan Pekolj; Joseph F Buell; Go Wakabayashi Journal: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 7.027
Authors: Alfredo D Guerron; Shamil Aliyev; Orhan Agcaoglu; Erol Aksoy; Halit Eren Taskin; Federico Aucejo; Charles Miller; John Fung; Eren Berber Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Tan To Cheung; Ronnie T P Poon; Wai Key Yuen; Kenneth S H Chok; Simon H Y Tsang; Thomas Yau; See Ching Chan; Chung Mau Lo Journal: ANZ J Surg Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 1.872
Authors: Joseph F Buell; Daniel Cherqui; David A Geller; Nicholas O'Rourke; David Iannitti; Ibrahim Dagher; Alan J Koffron; Mark Thomas; Brice Gayet; Ho Seong Han; Go Wakabayashi; Giulio Belli; Hironori Kaneko; Chen-Guo Ker; Olivier Scatton; Alexis Laurent; Eddie K Abdalla; Prosanto Chaudhury; Erik Dutson; Clark Gamblin; Michael D'Angelica; David Nagorney; Giuliano Testa; Daniel Labow; Derrik Manas; Ronnie T Poon; Heidi Nelson; Robert Martin; Bryan Clary; Wright C Pinson; John Martinie; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Robert Goldstein; Sasan Roayaie; David Barlet; Joseph Espat; Michael Abecassis; Myrddin Rees; Yuman Fong; Kelly M McMasters; Christoph Broelsch; Ron Busuttil; Jacques Belghiti; Steven Strasberg; Ravi S Chari Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Sebastian Knitter; Andreas Andreou; Daniel Kradolfer; Anika Sophie Beierle; Sina Pesthy; Anne-Christine Eichelberg; Anika Kästner; Linda Feldbrügge; Felix Krenzien; Mareike Schulz; Vanessa Banz; Anja Lachenmayer; Matthias Biebl; Wenzel Schöning; Daniel Candinas; Johann Pratschke; Guido Beldi; Moritz Schmelzle Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-12-13 Impact factor: 4.241