Literature DB >> 26901679

Comparison of clinical trial versus non-clinical trial treatment outcomes of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia using comparable regimens.

Wasil Jastaniah1,2, Naglla Elimam1, Khalid Abdalla1, Sami Felimban1, Mohammed Burhan Abrar1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Treatment regimens tested in major clinical trials, conducted by cooperative groups, are often adapted as standard of care by cancer centers with the hope to replicate the treatment outcomes reported in these landmark studies. It is therefore postulated that applying clinical trial regimens in a non-clinical trial setting yield similar outcomes. The aim of the present study was to explore this hypothesis in the context of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in our institution.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 224 consecutive pediatric ALL cases treated between January 2001 and December 2007. Standard-risk (SR) patients were treated on CCG-1991 (regimen OD) while high-risk (HR) patients were treated on CCG-1961 (regimen D). Results were compared with those of the equivalent regimen in the original clinical trials. Statistical analysis was carried using chi-square or Fisher's exact test, Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests.
RESULTS: Comparison of treatment outcomes revealed that SR patients had inferior 5-year overall survival (OS) of (89.0 ± 2.9 vs. 96.0% ± 0.9%); event-free survival of (82.3 ± 3.5 vs. 88.7% ± 1.4%); and relapse rate of (15.8 vs. 9.3% (P = 0.034)) compared to patients treated in the clinical trial. However, no statistically significant difference in treatment outcomes was observed between HR patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite using comparable regimens, suboptimal outcomes were noted in SR patients implying that similar treatments do not necessarily yield similar outcomes. This underscores the need to evaluate outcomes of adapted regimens to identify areas that need further improvement in centers not enrolling patients on prospective collaborative clinical trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALL; CCG; COG; Child; Leukemia; Regimen

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26901679     DOI: 10.1080/10245332.2015.1101974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematology        ISSN: 1024-5332            Impact factor:   2.269


  2 in total

1.  Association of clinical trial enrollment and survival using contemporary therapy for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Diana J Moke; Matthew J Oberley; Deepa Bhojwani; Chintan Parekh; Etan Orgel
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Clinical utility of the Revised International Staging System in unselected patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  N Tandon; S V Rajkumar; B LaPlant; A Pettinger; M Q Lacy; A Dispenzieri; F K Buadi; M A Gertz; S R Hayman; N Leung; R S Go; D Dingli; P Kapoor; Y Lin; Y L Hwa; A L Fonder; M A Hobbs; S R Zeldenrust; J A Lust; W I Gonsalves; S J Russell; S K Kumar
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 11.037

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.