| Literature DB >> 26900787 |
Premkumari Kumarathasan1, Renaud Vincent2, Agnieszka Bielecki1, Erica Blais1, Katrin Blank1, Dharani Das1, Subramanian Karthikeyan2, Sabit Cakmak3, Mandy Fisher3, Tye Arbuckle3, William Fraser4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is paucity of information on mechanisms constituting adverse birth outcomes. We assessed here the relationship between vascular integrity and adverse birth effects. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Gestational age; infant birth weight; maternal plasma biomarkers; oxidative stress; vascular function
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26900787 PMCID: PMC4841026 DOI: 10.3109/1354750X.2015.1134663
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomarkers ISSN: 1354-750X Impact factor: 2.658
Characteristics of the mothers and pregnancy outcomes.
| Maternal characteristics | Median (10th, 90th percentiles) |
|---|---|
| Maternal age (years) | 33 (26, 40) |
| Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m2) | 24 (20, 32) |
| Maternal outcomes | |
| Systolic BP (mm Hg) | 110 (97, 128)[109.5 (97, 124)] |
| Diastolic BP(mm Hg) | 68 (59, 80)[68.5 (59, 79.5)] |
| Birth outcomes | |
| Infant birth weight (g) | 3498 (2700, 4172) |
| Gestational age (weeks) | 39 (37, 41) |
These values are for the entire MIREC cohort.
Figure 1. Distribution profiles for the n = 144 pregnancies. (A) Infant birth weight. (B) Gestational age. (C) Birth weight/gestational age. Black circles: subsample for current study (n = 144). Empty circles: Entire MIREC Cohort.
Figure 2. Heatmap and hierarchical clustering of correlation analysis results for all data. Color key/histogram indicates the strength of correlation (r values). Darker (red) shade indicates positive correlation. Lighter (yellow) shade indicates negative correlation.
Maternal markers affecting different birth outcomes as determined by regression model analyses.
| Infant birth weight (IBW) distribution | Infant birth weight for gestational age (IBW-GA) distribution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birth outcome | Maternal factors | Maternal factors | Maternal factors | Maternal factors |
| IBW | ICAM-1 ( | VEGF ( | VCAM-1 ( | BET-1 ( |
| GA | MMP-2 ( | MMP-2 ( | – | – |
| IBW/GA | BET-1 ( | BET-1 ( | – | – |
| <25th percentile IBW | BET-1 ( | BET-1 ( | SysBP ( | BET-1 ( |
| >75th percentile IBW | ET-3 ( | VEGF ( | VCAM-1 ( | VEGF ( |
Best subsets regression results (e.g. <25th percentile, r = 0.46; >75th percentile, r = 0.36).
Polytomous logistic regression results.
Figure 3. Venn diagram of maternal factors dictating infant birth weight based on infant birth weight distribution data analysed by best subsets regression analyses. (A) All data. (B) <25th percentile IBW. (C) >75th percentile IBW.
Figure 4. Association of maternal biomarker profiles and (A) infant birth weight. (B) Gestational age.
Figure 5. Primary protein networks obtained through ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) of the fold change of plasma markers in the identified sub groups versus the control group (25th–75th percentile). (A) Network 1 depicting pathways related to cardiovascular disease (<25th percentile) and (B) Network 2 depicting pathways related to inflammatory response (>75th percentile). Red: up-regulation; Green: down-regulation.