Literature DB >> 26900479

Mercury pollution for marine environment at Farwa Island, Libya.

Adel A S Banana1, R M S Radin Mohamed2, A A S Al-Gheethi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Farwa is an Island in Libya receives petrochemical wastes generated from General Company of Chemical Industries (GCCI) since more than 40 years. AIM: The present work aimed to determine the concentrations of mercury (Hg(+2)) in fish, marine plants and sediment collected from Farwa lagoon to evaluate effect of industrial wastewater from GCCI on the marine environment.
METHODS: Hundred and twelve samples of fish, pearl oyster, cuttlefish sediments and marine plants were analyzed to determine Hg(2+) concentration during the period from January to August 2014 by using Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (AAS).
RESULTS: The highest concentration of Hg(2+) was detected in Pinctada radiata (11.67 ± 3.30 μgg (-1)) followed by Serranus scriba (6.37 ± 0.11 μg g (-1)) and Epinephelus marginatus (6.19 ± 0.02 μg g (-1)). About 75 % of marine plants contained the maximum contaminations during the summer season. In fish samples Hg(2+) concentrations exceeded the levels provided by international standards.
CONCLUSIONS: The fish at Farwa lagoon is heavily contaminated with Hg(2+) which may represent a source for mercury poisoning for human.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contamination; Farwa Island; Fishes; Mercury

Year:  2016        PMID: 26900479      PMCID: PMC4761145          DOI: 10.1186/s40201-016-0246-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng


Background

The increasing of industrial activities has led to increase the contamination of environment with several types of pollutants as due to discharge of industrial wastewater into the environment and aquatic system. petrochemicals factors is among various of industrials process which produce heavily contaminated wastewater. In the developed countries the wastewater are treated using advanced technologies such as reverse osmosis, nanotube carbon, adsorption process using different types of adsorbents as well as photo-degradation processes of degradable toxic compounds. Those technologies have high efficiency to remove most toxic substances from wastewater before final disposal into the environment. Others technologies such as multi-walled carbon nanotube/tungsten oxide (MWCNT/WO3) and alumina nano-particles polyamide membrane still under investigation and they exhibited high efficiency for the removal and degrade various types of pollutants based on the lab scale experiments [1-7]. In the term of heavy metals contamination, the petrochemical industries represent one of the main sources for generation of these toxics into the environment. the adsorption process materials is the most common treatment process to remove heavy metals from wastewater. Recently, some authors focused on improvement this process to be high efficiency. Gupta et al. [8] has combined the magnetic properties of iron oxide with adsorption properties of carbon nanotubes to increase the removal of Cr2+ ions. Heavy metals are groups of elements with high molecular weights that are not degraded when taken into the body; instead, they accumulate in specific body organs and cause illness. Heavy metals have the potential to disrupt the metabolism and biological activities of many proteins because it can oxidize the sulfhydryl groups [9]. Among several of heavy metals, mercury (Hg2+) is the most toxic element for organisms [10-12]. Hg2+ is very toxic pollutant that contaminates fish around the world, therefore fish represent the main source of Hg2+ for human [13]. The studies indicated that mercury accumulation in the oceans correlates with the rising tide of mercury pollution. The most serious Hg2+ poisoning has been occurred due to consumption of Hg2+ contaminated fish and other seafood polluted by industrial wastewater [14]. However, information for mercury contamination of fishes and marine environment in Libya is unavailable; this might due to absence of academic research for more than 40 years. Therefore, the present work aimed to evaluate the concentrations of Hg2+ in fish, sea woods and sediments at Farwa Island, Libya that received petrochemical wastes generated from General Company of Chemical Industries (GCCI) for more than 40 years.

Methods

Study area

Farwa Island is located on the Mediterranean in West Zawya, Libya (33° 04’ N, 1° 50’ E to 33° 08’ N and 11° 32’ E) from Abu- Kamash east to the Tunisian border in the west (Fig. 1). It comprises Farwa lagoon that covering an area of 32 km2 and is the largest lagoon on the Libyan coast. GCCI is located at Abu- Kamash chemical complex. GCCI was opened in 1970s and consist of 3 units that produce 104,000 tonnes/year Ethylene di-chloride, 60, 000 tonnes poly vinyl chloride (PVC), 50,000 tonnes caustic soda and 45,000 tonnes chlorine. In addition to sodium carbonate, sodium hypochlorite and HCl. GCCI has four dumping sites, two of them are located on the west while another two are located on the east.
Fig. 1

Google map of study area, A) GCCI B) site of fish samples collection C) site of marine plant samples collection (100 m); D) site of marine plant samples collection (1000 m); E) site of marine plant samples collection (3000 m); F) site of sediment samples collection (100 m, W); G) site of sediment samples collection (500 m, W); H) site of sediment samples collection (1000 m, W); I) site of sediment samples collection (3000 m, W); J) site of sediment samples collection (100 m, E); K) site of sediment samples collection (500 m, E); L) site of sediment samples collection (1000 m, E); site of sediment samples collection (3000 m, E)

Google map of study area, A) GCCI B) site of fish samples collection C) site of marine plant samples collection (100 m); D) site of marine plant samples collection (1000 m); E) site of marine plant samples collection (3000 m); F) site of sediment samples collection (100 m, W); G) site of sediment samples collection (500 m, W); H) site of sediment samples collection (1000 m, W); I) site of sediment samples collection (3000 m, W); J) site of sediment samples collection (100 m, E); K) site of sediment samples collection (500 m, E); L) site of sediment samples collection (1000 m, E); site of sediment samples collection (3000 m, E)

Collection and analysis of samples

Hundred ninety two samples (in triplicate, 3 sample/month) of fishes, oysters, cuttlefish, magnoliophyta plants and sediments were collected from marine environment around of Farwa Island, Libya during the period from January to August 2014. The marine organisms collected samples included ten types of fishes, only one type of oyster and one type of cuttlefish. These samples were collected using local fishermen. Magnoliophyta plant samples were collected from different location around Farwa Lagoon, Zone I (100 m), Zone II (1000 m) and Zone III (3000 m). These locations represent the distance between the sampling point and the factory and they were selected because its very close to GCCI and the possibility to heavy contamination with Hg2+ is high. The samples were transported inside ice box to the laboratory and kept in deep freezer at −20 °C until analysis. Sample preparation and analysis were carried out according to Bernhard [15]. Liver, muscle, gill, heart, air sac and stomach-intestine were removed before the analysis [16]. Fish samples were homogenized in a blender. Magnoliophyta plants were cut out into small pieces (5 mm in diameter) and then homogenized in a blender. A weight of 10 g of homogenate for each of fish and magnoliophyta plants was digested according to APHA [17]. In briefly; five mL of HNO3 (65 %) and 5 mL of H2SO4 were added into sample placed inside flask (100 mL). The mixture was heated on a hot plate (70–80 °C) for 30 min to the lowest volume (20 mL) before precipitation occurs. The digestion step was continued until light colored, clear solution was observed. The flask walls was washed with distilled water and filtered using Whatman, 125 mm Ø, filter papers (Cat No. 1001 England). The filtrate was transported into a volumetric flask (100 mL) with 10 mL water and mixed thoroughly. Sediment samples (1 kg) were collected by using grab sampler from eight sites located on the west and east of GCCI. Samples were transported to the laboratory and dried in oven at 50 °C. After that, sediment samples were powdered and passed through 160 μm sieve. The samples packed in paper bags and stored in deep freezer at −20 °C prior to analysis. The mercury was extracted from the samples with 10 mL HNO3/HCl (1:3 v/v) by using a microwave digestion system as described above. The Hg2+ concentrations in the digested samples were determined by an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) (Model P.E.A ANALYST 100, HGA-800 and MHS-10, Perkin Elmer, USA). The concentrations of heavy metals was calculated (μg g−1) using Eqs. (1) Where A = concentrations of metals in digested solution μg g B = final volume of digested solution mL C = sample size, gram

Data analysis

The data were not normally distributed, therefore, they were log transformed and subjected to parametric statistics. The differences in Hg2+ concentrations of samples investigated were tested by ANOVA. The statistical analyses was performed SPSS (version 11.5).

Results and discussion

The present study investigated the mercury contamination of marine environment included fishes, oysters, cuttlefish, magnoliophyta plants and sediments at Farwa Island, Libya that are received industrial wastewater generated from GCCI since 40 years ago. The concentration of mercury at this place has not reported before, thus the current work was conducted to evaluate the effect of petrochemical wastewater on the environment. The results revealed that the Hg2+ concentration differed significantly (p < 0.05) during the period of study (Table 1). These variables may be due to the climatic conditions of the area, winter season extends from November to March and is generally cold and rainy with unstable winds blowing from different directions which lead to cause dilution of Farwa lagoon, while summer season (May to September) is rather hot and dry [18]. The mean of Hg2+ concentrations in fish, oysters and cuttlefish samples collected during the period study are presented in Table 2. It can be noted that the Hg2+ concentrations ranged from 3.13 ± 1.5 μg g−1 in Serranus scriba to 0.34 ± 0.33 μg g−1 in Sciaena umbra. The distributions of Hg2+ concentrations for each species in the period from January to August 2014 are depicted in Fig. 2. It shown that the highest concentration of Hg2+ was detected in Pinctada radiata (11.67 ± 3.30 μgg−1) in August, followed by Serranus scriba (6.37 ± 0.11 μg g−1) in July and Epinephelus marginatus (6.19 ± 0.02 μg g−1) in February. The Serranus scriba have high concentration of Hg2+ during the study period from January to July followed by Epinephelus marginatus, the average was 2.83 vs. 2.18 μg g-1. The lowest Hg2+ concentrations were detected in Pagrus pagrus (0.001 μg g−1) and Sciaena umbra (0.01 μg g−1). Both types contained the lowest average concentrations during the period of study (0.33 and 0.36 μg g−1 respectively). Lithognathus mormyrus has the highest Hg (3.59 ± 0.19 μg g−1) among the fish samples collected in April, whereas Oedalechilus labeo has the highest Hg (3.59 ± 0.01 μg g−1) among the fish samples collected in May. In June, the highest Hg2+ was determined in Lithognathus mormyrus (4.97 ± 0.04 μg g−1).
Table 1

ANOVA Analysis of Hg2+ concentrations in different fish samples during the period of study from January to August 2014

SampleSum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.
Serranus scriba Between groups54.36977.7671257.814.000
Within groups.09916.006
Total54.46823
Oedalechilus labeoBetween groups28.47874.0682697.193.000
Within groups.02416.002
Total28.50223
Diplodus vulgaris Between groups6.5887.9411146.640.000
Within groups.01316.001
Total6.60223
Dicentrarchus labrax Between groups4.6977.671712.616.000
Within groups.01516.001
Total4.71223
Lithognathus mormyrus Between groups70.353710.0502138.378.000
Within groups.07516.005
Total70.42823
Epinephelus marginatus Between groups99.308714.18716690.375.000
Within groups.01416.001
Total99.32123
Sarpa salpa Between groups11.57771.654301.838.000
Within groups.08816.005
Total11.66423
Sciaena umbra Between groups3.4487.493467.260.000
Within groups.01716.001
Total3.46523
Pagrus pagrus Between groups3.3737.48298.591.000
Within groups.07816.005
Total3.45123
Caranx crysos Between groups5.2377.748949.947.000
Within groups.01316.001
Total5.24923
Pinctada radiata Between groups310.444744.3496809.846.000
Within groups.10416.007
Total310.54823
Sepia officinalis Between groups2.7037.386639.161.000
Within groups.01016.001
Total2.71323
Table 2

Hg2+ concentrations in Fishes collected from Farwa lagoon, Libya which received petrochemical wastes from General Company of Chemical Industries (GCCI), (±SD represent the standard division from the mean, n = 24 for each sample)

Sample No.Family nameEnglish nameScience nameHg concentration (μg g−1)
1 Serranidae Painted comber Serranus scriba 3.13 ± 1.5
2 Mugilidae Boxlip Mullet Oedalechilus labeo 1.4 ± 1.1
3 Sparidae Common Two-Banded Seabream Diplodus vulgaris 1.4 ± 0.53
4 Moronidae European seabass Dicentrarchus labrax 0.89 ± 0.45
5 Sparidae Striped sea bream Lithognathus mormyrus 1.5 ± 0.7
6 Serranidae Dusky Grouper Epinephelus marginatus 1.9 ± 2.0
7 Sparidae Salema Sarpa salpa 0.99 ± 0.71
8Sciaenidae sculpin Sciaena umbra 0.34 ± 0.33
9 Dentex macrophthalmus Red porgy Pagrus pagrus 0.39 ± 0.38
10 Carangidae blue runner Caranx crysos 0.78 ± 0.48
11 Oyster Rayed Pearl Oyster Pinctada radiata 2.3 ± 3.6
12 Cuttlefish common cuttlefish Sepia officinalis 0.63 ± 0.34
Fig. 2

Seasonal distribution of Hg2+ concentrations in fish, oysters and cuttlefish samples collected from Farwa lagoon, Libya; a) Serranus scriba; b) Oedalechilus labeo, c) Diplodus vulgaris; d) Dicentrarchus labrax; e) Lithognathus mormyrus; f) Epinephelus marginatus; g) Sarpa salpa; h) Sciaena umbra; i) Pagrus pagrus; j) Caranx crysos; k) Pinctada radiate; l) Sepia officinalis

ANOVA Analysis of Hg2+ concentrations in different fish samples during the period of study from January to August 2014 Hg2+ concentrations in Fishes collected from Farwa lagoon, Libya which received petrochemical wastes from General Company of Chemical Industries (GCCI), (±SD represent the standard division from the mean, n = 24 for each sample) Seasonal distribution of Hg2+ concentrations in fish, oysters and cuttlefish samples collected from Farwa lagoon, Libya; a) Serranus scriba; b) Oedalechilus labeo, c) Diplodus vulgaris; d) Dicentrarchus labrax; e) Lithognathus mormyrus; f) Epinephelus marginatus; g) Sarpa salpa; h) Sciaena umbra; i) Pagrus pagrus; j) Caranx crysos; k) Pinctada radiate; l) Sepia officinalis The analysis for association between Hg2+ concentrations in fish, oysters as well as cuttlefish samples and months indicated that the concentration of Hg2+ in Serranus scriba, Dicentrarchus labrax, Sciaena umbra and Pinctada radiata associated significantly (p < 0.05) to the seasons with R2 0.64, 0.24, 0.21 and 0.34 respectively (Table 3). The Hg2+ concentrations in magnoliophyta plants are presented in Table 4. It can be noted that the maximum concentration was detected in the samples collected from place near of GCCI (100 m). The highest concentrations were determined in samples collected during April, where, 2.33 ± 0.60, 1.44 ± 0.42 and 0.96 ± 0.12 μg g−1 were determined in samples collected from zone I, II and III respectively. The lowest Hg2+ was recorded in samples collected from zone III (0.02 ± 0.00 μg g−1) during January. In comparison with the study conducted by Pergent-Martini [19] which was carried out on the mercury contamination in the Posidonia oceanica Collected from mediterranean sea. It can be noted that the Hg2+ concentrations in this study was quite high. There would be due to dispose of wastewater generated from GCCI into the sea without treatment process since 40 years ago.
Table 3

Measures of association between Hg2+ concentrations in fish, oysters as well as cuttlefish samples and months

Sample*monthRR SquaredEtaEta SquaredSignificance (p value)
Serranus scriba 0.800.640.990.990.01
Oedalechilus labeo −0.2280.051.000.990.14
Diplodus vulgaris 0.3270.110.990.990.06
Dicentrarchus labrax 0.4930.240.990.990.01
Lithognathus mormyrus 0.1910.040.990.990.18
Epinephelus marginatus −0.1730.031.001.000.21
Sarpa salpa −0.0680.010.990.990.38
Sciaena umbra 0.4540.210.990.990.01
Pagrus pagrus 0.2150.050.980.980.16
Caranx crysos 0.0060.000.990.990.45
Pinctada radiata 0.5870.341.001.000.01
Sepia officinalis −0.1880.040.990.990.19
Table 4

Hg2+ concentrations in magnoliophyta plant samples collected from different distance of GCCI at Farwa lagoon, Libya (±SD represent the standard division from the mean, n = 3 for each sample per month)

Sample/monthHg2+ concentrations (μg g−1)
Zone I (100 m)Zone II (1000 m)Zone III (3000 m)
10.82 ± 0.200.93 ± 0.130.02 ± 0.00
20.39 ± 0.120.50 ± 0.080.10 ± 0.09
32.10 ± 0.910.57 ± 0.160.82 ± 0.20
42.33 ± 0.601.44 ± 0.420.96 ± 0.12
51.06 ± 0.180.79 ± 0.120.75 ± 0.19
61.00 ± 0.131.38 ± 0.920.54 ± 0.20
70.87 ± 0.300.25 ± 0.090.64 ± 0.21
81.40 ± 0.421.07 ± 0.130.71 ± 0.15
Measures of association between Hg2+ concentrations in fish, oysters as well as cuttlefish samples and months Hg2+ concentrations in magnoliophyta plant samples collected from different distance of GCCI at Farwa lagoon, Libya (±SD represent the standard division from the mean, n = 3 for each sample per month) The present study revealed that the concentrations of Hg2+ in all types of fish samples were more than the standards limits recommended by FDA and FAO-WHO [20, 21]. According to U.S. EPA [22], Hg2+ should be less than 0.3 μg g−1 wet fish muscle tissue for protection of human health. However, Zaza et al. [13] reported that the minimum level of Hg2+ is 0.5 μg g−1 for fish species. In the present study, the minimum concentration of Hg2+ was 1 μg g−1 in Pagrus pagrus. Fish consumption is one of the major factors of Hg2+ intake for humans [23, 24]. Hg2+ is very dangerous for pregnant woman because mercury is most harmful to developing foetuses, infants, and young children. High Hg2+ concentration was detected in sediment samples collected from the West of GCCI than those collected from the East. However, both sites contain high concentration of Hg2+. The Hg2+ concentration decreased significantly (p < 0.05) as the site distance from GCCI, the maximum Hg2+ was noted in sediment samples taken from the west (100 m from GCCI) where 11.14 ± 4.11 μg g−1 was recorded in April 2014 (Table 5). Among the sediment samples collected from the east, the samples taken in June contain 4.67 ± 1.62 μg Hg2+ g−1. The pollution of environmental area around GCCI represent a serious problem due to that the surrounding areas are used for agricultural purpose such as for Grapes, olives and almonds. More than 1500 people are living around the GCCI.
Table 5

Hg2+ concentrations in sediment samples collected from the west and east GCCI during the period January to August 2014 (±SD represent the standard division from the mean, n = 3 for each sample per month)

Sediments sample/monthHg2+ Concentration (μg g−1)
West of GCCIEast of GCCIControl
<100 m500 m1000 m3000 m100 m500 m1000 m3000 mZwara city (20 km)
13.54 ± 1.101.38 ± 0.141.09 ± 0.040.64 ± 0.321.96 ± 1.010.55 ± 0.060.03 ± 0.00.01 ± 0.00.001 ± 0.0
26.74 ± 3.144.06 ± 1.811.07 ± 0.520.32 ± 0.191.55 ± 0.711.12 ± 0.240.75 ± 0.180.01 ± 0.00.001 ± 0.0
34.58 ± 1.433.04 ± 0.930.06 ± 0.090.02 ± 0.012.07 ± 0.910.75 ± 0.180.05 ± 0.010.001 ± 0.00.001 ± 0.0
411.14 ± 4.112.64 ± 0.831.95 ± 0.310.56 ± 0.083.65 ± 1.041.47 ± 0.910.01 ± 0.00.001 ± 0.00.001 ± 0.0
58.50 ± 2.845.07 ± 2.811.01 ± 0.410.75 ± 0.113.12 ± 1.110.06 ± 0.010.003 ± 0.00.001 ± 0.00.001 ± 0.0
62.46 ± 1.313.65 ± 1.710.95 ± 0.710.07 ± 0.224.67 ± 1.621.5 ± 0.460.001 ± 0.00.01 ± 0.00.003 ± 0.0
75.21 ± 2.284.06 ± 1.930.50 ± 0.010.43 ± 0.172.13 ± 0.980.04 ± 0.00.01 ± 0.00.002 ± 0.00.001 ± 0.0
81.56 ± 0.733.25 ± 0.880.36 ± 0.030.05 ± 0.03.17 ± 0.511.45 ± 0.290.003 ± 0.00.002 ± 0.00.001 ± 0.0
Hg2+ concentrations in sediment samples collected from the west and east GCCI during the period January to August 2014 (±SD represent the standard division from the mean, n = 3 for each sample per month) Farwa Island has high fishery production, but this Island had been exposed for heavy pollution due to GCCI for more than 40 years. Farwa Island is the most important coastal and marine site in western Libya, in terms of its high marine and coastal biodiversity based on several surveys and studies during the last years. However, no information was recorded according to mercury pollution. This region is characterized by an exceptional importance in terms of fish and artisanal fisheries, aquaculture, sea birds, sea grass meadows, land/seascape features and, above all, as one of the few regions in the Mediterranean to experience active tidal movements. In addition to some endangered species which makes it an important area for larva and juvenile protection. In the term of biodiversity, Farwa has many economically important species and certain endangered species are recognized [18]. In the term of toxic pollutants in industrial wastewater and their environmental impact and health effect, the sea water around of GCCI should be treated to remove of Hg2+ ions. Variety of biological and physico-chemical methods for wastewater treatment has been developed. Among those technologies, reverse osmosis, activated carbon, advanced oxidation, alumina-coated carbon nanotubes, tire derived carbons, porous carbon, carbon nanotubes and fullerene and CNT/magnesium oxide composite have exhibited high efficiency for removal of heavy metals from different aqueous solution [25-33].

Conclusions

It can be concluded that the heavily contamination of fish, oysters as well as cuttlefish in marine environment around GCCI represent a main source for food poisoning among peoples living in this area. Therefore, the contaminated area should be treated to prevent health risk associated with mercury contamination.
  17 in total

1.  Decoloration treatment of a hazardous triarylmethane dye, Light Green SF (Yellowish) by waste material adsorbents.

Authors:  Alok Mittal; Jyoti Mittal; Arti Malviya; Dipika Kaur; V K Gupta
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 8.128

2.  Removal and recovery of Chrysoidine Y from aqueous solutions by waste materials.

Authors:  Alok Mittal; Jyoti Mittal; Arti Malviya; V K Gupta
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 8.128

Review 3.  Sorption of pollutants by porous carbon, carbon nanotubes and fullerene- an overview.

Authors:  Vinod K Gupta; Tawfik A Saleh
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Photo-catalyzed degradation of hazardous dye methyl orange by use of a composite catalyst consisting of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and titanium dioxide.

Authors:  Tawfik A Saleh; Vinod K Gupta
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 8.128

5.  Synthesis and characterization of alumina-coated carbon nanotubes and their application for lead removal.

Authors:  Vinod K Gupta; Shilpi Agarwal; Tawfik A Saleh
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 10.588

Review 6.  The toxicology of mercury.

Authors:  T W Clarkson
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 6.250

7.  Functionalization of tungsten oxide into MWCNT and its application for sunlight-induced degradation of rhodamine B.

Authors:  Tawfik A Saleh; Vinod K Gupta
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 8.128

8.  Chromium removal by combining the magnetic properties of iron oxide with adsorption properties of carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  V K Gupta; Shilpi Agarwal; Tawfik A Saleh
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 9.  Toxicity of mercury.

Authors:  N Langford; R Ferner
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 10.  Adsorptive removal of dyes from aqueous solution onto carbon nanotubes: a review.

Authors:  Vinod Kumar Gupta; Rajeev Kumar; Arunima Nayak; Tawfik A Saleh; M A Barakat
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 12.984

View more
  1 in total

1.  Residual Levels of Mercury, Cadmium, Lead and Arsenic in Some Commercially Key Species from Italian Coasts (Adriatic Sea): Focus on Human Health.

Authors:  Grazia Barone; Arianna Storelli; Rita Garofalo; Rosanna Mallamaci; Maria Maddalena Storelli
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-04-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.