Tracy Glauser1, Shlomo Shinnar2, David Gloss3, Brian Alldredge4, Ravindra Arya1, Jacquelyn Bainbridge5, Mary Bare1, Thomas Bleck6, W Edwin Dodson7, Lisa Garrity8, Andy Jagoda9, Daniel Lowenstein10, John Pellock11, James Riviello12, Edward Sloan13, David M Treiman14. 1. Division of Neurology, Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH. 2. Departments of Neurology, Pediatrics, and Epidemiology and Population Health, and the Comprehensive Epilepsy Management Center, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY. 3. CAMC Neurology Group, Charleston, WV. 4. School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA. 5. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO. 6. Departments of Neurological Sciences, Neurosurgery, Medicine, and Anesthesiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL. 7. Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. 8. Division of Pharmacy, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH. 9. Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY. 10. Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA. 11. Division of Pediatric Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA. 12. NYU Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York, NY. 13. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL. 14. Division of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ.
Abstract
CONTEXT: The optimal pharmacologic treatment for early convulsive status epilepticus is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To analyze efficacy, tolerability and safety data for anticonvulsant treatment of children and adults with convulsive status epilepticus and use this analysis to develop an evidence-based treatment algorithm. DATA SOURCES: Structured literature review using MEDLINE, Embase, Current Contents, and Cochrane library supplemented with article reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials of anticonvulsant treatment for seizures lasting longer than 5 minutes. DATA EXTRACTION: Individual studies were rated using predefined criteria and these results were used to form recommendations, conclusions, and an evidence-based treatment algorithm. RESULTS: A total of 38 randomized controlled trials were identified, rated and contributed to the assessment. Only four trials were considered to have class I evidence of efficacy. Two studies were rated as class II and the remaining 32 were judged to have class III evidence. In adults with convulsive status epilepticus, intramuscular midazolam, intravenous lorazepam, intravenous diazepam and intravenous phenobarbital are established as efficacious as initial therapy (Level A). Intramuscular midazolam has superior effectiveness compared to intravenous lorazepam in adults with convulsive status epilepticus without established intravenous access (Level A). In children, intravenous lorazepam and intravenous diazepam are established as efficacious at stopping seizures lasting at least 5 minutes (Level A) while rectal diazepam, intramuscular midazolam, intranasal midazolam, and buccal midazolam are probably effective (Level B). No significant difference in effectiveness has been demonstrated between intravenous lorazepam and intravenous diazepam in adults or children with convulsive status epilepticus (Level A). Respiratory and cardiac symptoms are the most commonly encountered treatment-emergent adverse events associated with intravenous anticonvulsant drug administration in adults with convulsive status epilepticus (Level A). The rate of respiratory depression in patients with convulsive status epilepticus treated with benzodiazepines is lower than in patients with convulsive status epilepticus treated with placebo indicating that respiratory problems are an important consequence of untreated convulsive status epilepticus (Level A). When both are available, fosphenytoin is preferred over phenytoin based on tolerability but phenytoin is an acceptable alternative (Level A). In adults, compared to the first therapy, the second therapy is less effective while the third therapy is substantially less effective (Level A). In children, the second therapy appears less effective and there are no data about third therapy efficacy (Level C). The evidence was synthesized into a treatment algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the paucity of well-designed randomized controlled trials, practical conclusions and an integrated treatment algorithm for the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus across the age spectrum (infants through adults) can be constructed. Multicenter, multinational efforts are needed to design, conduct and analyze additional randomized controlled trials that can answer the many outstanding clinically relevant questions identified in this guideline.
CONTEXT: The optimal pharmacologic treatment for early convulsive status epilepticus is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To analyze efficacy, tolerability and safety data for anticonvulsant treatment of children and adults with convulsive status epilepticus and use this analysis to develop an evidence-based treatment algorithm. DATA SOURCES: Structured literature review using MEDLINE, Embase, Current Contents, and Cochrane library supplemented with article reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials of anticonvulsant treatment for seizures lasting longer than 5 minutes. DATA EXTRACTION: Individual studies were rated using predefined criteria and these results were used to form recommendations, conclusions, and an evidence-based treatment algorithm. RESULTS: A total of 38 randomized controlled trials were identified, rated and contributed to the assessment. Only four trials were considered to have class I evidence of efficacy. Two studies were rated as class II and the remaining 32 were judged to have class III evidence. In adults with convulsive status epilepticus, intramuscular midazolam, intravenous lorazepam, intravenous diazepam and intravenous phenobarbital are established as efficacious as initial therapy (Level A). Intramuscular midazolam has superior effectiveness compared to intravenous lorazepam in adults with convulsive status epilepticus without established intravenous access (Level A). In children, intravenous lorazepam and intravenous diazepam are established as efficacious at stopping seizures lasting at least 5 minutes (Level A) while rectal diazepam, intramuscular midazolam, intranasal midazolam, and buccal midazolam are probably effective (Level B). No significant difference in effectiveness has been demonstrated between intravenous lorazepam and intravenous diazepam in adults or children with convulsive status epilepticus (Level A). Respiratory and cardiac symptoms are the most commonly encountered treatment-emergent adverse events associated with intravenous anticonvulsant drug administration in adults with convulsive status epilepticus (Level A). The rate of respiratory depression in patients with convulsive status epilepticus treated with benzodiazepines is lower than in patients with convulsive status epilepticus treated with placebo indicating that respiratory problems are an important consequence of untreated convulsive status epilepticus (Level A). When both are available, fosphenytoin is preferred over phenytoin based on tolerability but phenytoin is an acceptable alternative (Level A). In adults, compared to the first therapy, the second therapy is less effective while the third therapy is substantially less effective (Level A). In children, the second therapy appears less effective and there are no data about third therapy efficacy (Level C). The evidence was synthesized into a treatment algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the paucity of well-designed randomized controlled trials, practical conclusions and an integrated treatment algorithm for the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus across the age spectrum (infants through adults) can be constructed. Multicenter, multinational efforts are needed to design, conduct and analyze additional randomized controlled trials that can answer the many outstanding clinically relevant questions identified in this guideline.
Authors: Estevo Santamarina; Manuel Toledo; Maria Sueiras; Miquel Raspall; Nadim Ailouti; Elena Lainez; Isabel Porta; R De Gracia; Manuel Quintana; Javier Alvarez-Sabín; Xavier Salas Puig Xavier Salas Puig Journal: J Neurol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: John McIntyre; Sue Robertson; Elizabeth Norris; Richard Appleton; William P Whitehouse; Barbara Phillips; Tim Martland; Kathleen Berry; Jacqueline Collier; Stephanie Smith; Imti Choonara Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jul 16-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jerome Niquet; Roger Baldwin; Lucie Suchomelova; Lucille Lumley; David Naylor; Roland Eavey; Claude G Wasterlain Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Richard J Burman; Joshua S Selfe; John Hamin Lee; Maurits van den Berg; Alexandru Calin; Neela K Codadu; Rebecca Wright; Sarah E Newey; R Ryley Parrish; Arieh A Katz; Jo M Wilmshurst; Colin J Akerman; Andrew J Trevelyan; Joseph V Raimondo Journal: Brain Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 13.501