Literature DB >> 26900207

Design and Evaluation of a Personal Diffusion Battery.

Donna J H Vosburgh1, Timothy Klein2, Maura Sheehan3, T Renee Anthony4, Thomas M Peters4.   

Abstract

A four-stage personal diffusion battery (pDB) was designed and constructed to measure submicron particle size distributions. The pDB consisted of a screen-type diffusion battery, solenoid valve system, and electronic controller. A data inversion spreadsheet was created to solve for the number median diameter (NMD), geometric standard deviation (GSD), and particle number concentration of unimodal aerosols using stage number concentrations from the pDB combined with a handheld condensation particle counter (pDB+CPC). The inversion spreadsheet included particle entry losses, theoretical penetrations across screens, the detection efficiency of the CPC, and constraints so the spreadsheet solved to values within the pDB range. Size distribution parameters (NMD, GSD, and number concentration) measured with the pDB+CPC with inversion spreadsheet were within 25% of those measured with a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) for 5 of 12 polydisperse combustion aerosols. For three tests conducted with propylene torch exhaust, the pDB+CPC with inversion spreadsheet successfully identified that the NMD was smaller than the constraint value of 16 nm. The ratio of the nanoparticle portion of the aerosol compared to the reference (Rnano) was calculated to determine the ability of pDB+CPC with inversion spreadsheet to measure the nanoparticle portion of the aerosols. The Rnano ranged from 0.87 to 1.01 when the inversion solved and from 0.06 to 2.01 when the inversion solved to a constraint. The pDB combined with CPC has limited use as a personal monitor but combining the pDB with a different detector would allow for the pDB to be used as a personal monitor.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 26900207      PMCID: PMC4758324          DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2012.762757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol        ISSN: 0278-6826            Impact factor:   2.908


  9 in total

1.  Ultrafine particle deposition in humans during rest and exercise.

Authors:  Christopher C Daigle; David C Chalupa; F Raymond Gibb; Paul E Morrow; Günter Oberdörster; Mark J Utell; Mark W Frampton
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  A novel form of diffusion battery.

Authors:  D Sinclair; G S Hoopes
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1975-01

3.  Comparison of mass-based and non-mass-based particle measurement systems for ultra-low emissions from automotive sources.

Authors:  Martin Mohr; Urs Lehmann; Josef Rütter
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Total lung deposition of ultrafine particles in elderly subjects during controlled breathing.

Authors:  Chong S Kim; Peter A Jaques
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Pulmonary toxicity study in rats with three forms of ultrafine-TiO2 particles: differential responses related to surface properties.

Authors:  David B Warheit; Thomas R Webb; Kenneth L Reed; Scott Frerichs; Christie M Sayes
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Pulmonary effects induced by ultrafine PTFE particles.

Authors:  C J Johnston; J N Finkelstein; P Mercer; N Corson; R Gelein; G Oberdörster
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Comparative pulmonary toxicity assessment of single-wall carbon nanotubes in rats.

Authors:  D B Warheit; B R Laurence; K L Reed; D H Roach; G A M Reynolds; T R Webb
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Size-dependent toxicity of metal oxide particles--a comparison between nano- and micrometer size.

Authors:  Hanna L Karlsson; Johanna Gustafsson; Pontus Cronholm; Lennart Möller
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 4.372

9.  A novel size-selective airborne particle size fractionating instrument for health risk evaluation.

Authors:  B Gorbunov; N D Priest; R B Muir; P R Jackson; H Gnewuch
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-03-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.