Literature DB >> 26899806

Thoughts on how to improve the quality of multicentre patch test studies.

Magnus Bruze1.   

Abstract

Multicentre patch test studies (MPTSs) can contribute useful information for diagnostic and preventive measures. The aim of the present paper is to propose how to perform high-quality MPTSs. To this end, factors of significance for the patch test result are discussed with regard to the standardization and calibration of high-quality MPTSs. The 16 factors discussed are scored 0, 1, 2, or 3, depending on the relative importance of a particular factor for the patch test result. The total score of an MPTS allows it to be ranked as having doubtful, acceptable, high or excellent quality. A total score of 30 is possible. Depending on the total score the MPTSs are grouped into those with a doubtful, acceptable, high, and excellent quality. In conclusion, high-quality MPTSs can be performed and are facilitated if a guideline and check list are followed when the study is being planned. The scoring enables the calculation of a total score, which can be used for quality ranking.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  allergic contact dermatitis; calibration; check list; contact allergy; guideline; monitoring; quality ranking; standardization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26899806     DOI: 10.1111/cod.12507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  4 in total

1.  Patch Testing with Propolis of Different Geographical Origins in a Baseline Series.

Authors:  Gunnar S A Nyman; Ana Maria Giménez-Arnau; Jurate Grigaitiene; Laura Malinauskiene; Evy Paulsen; Lina Hagvall
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 3.875

2.  Contact Allergy in Western Sweden to Propolis of Four Different Origins.

Authors:  Gunnar Nyman; Sara Oldberg Wagner; Katarzyna Prystupa-Chalkidis; Kristina Ryberg; Lina Hagvall
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.875

3.  Simultaneous patch testing with fragrance markers in the baseline series and the ingredients of fragrance mixes: An update from southern Sweden.

Authors:  Thanisorn Sukakul; Magnus Bruze; Martin Mowitz; Annarita Antelmi; Waranya Boonchai; Jakob Dahlin; Nils Hamnerius; Inese Hauksson; Tina Lejding; Cecilia Svedman
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.419

4.  Prevalence of contact allergy to metals in the European general population with a focus on nickel and piercings: The EDEN Fragrance Study.

Authors:  Marie L A Schuttelaar; Robert F Ofenloch; Magnus Bruze; Simone Cazzaniga; Peter Elsner; Margarida Gonçalo; Luigi Naldi; Åke Svensson; Thomas L Diepgen
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 6.600

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.