Literature DB >> 26899504

Predictors of and attitudes toward counseling about SUDEP and other epilepsy risk factors among Austrian, German, and Swiss neurologists and neuropediatricians.

Adam Strzelczyk1,2, Gerda Zschebek1,3, Sebastian Bauer1,2, Christoph Baumgartner4, Martin Grond5, Anke Hermsen1,2, Matthias Kieslich6, Günter Krämer7, Gerhard Kurlemann8, Theodor W May9, Thomas Mayer10, Bernd A Neubauer11, Margarete Pfäfflin9, Barbara Plecko12, Philippe Ryvlin13, Susanne Schubert-Bast2,6,14, Hermann Stefan15, Eugen Trinka16, Susanne Knake1, Carola Seifart3, Felix Rosenow1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the attitudes toward counseling about sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) and other epilepsy risk factors among Austrian, German, and Swiss neurologists and neuropediatricians, and to determine factors associated with not discussing SUDEP.
METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to approximately 5,000 neurologists and neuropediatricians in 2014 regarding respondents' demographics, their working environments, and how often they discussed SUDEP, suicidal ideations on anticonvulsive medication, driving restrictions, and risks in daily life activities.
RESULTS: In total, 519 surveys were completed (respondents' mean age: 45.5 years, 41.6% female, 66.9% adult neurologists, 31.0% neuropediatricians). A minority of 2.7% reported that they counseled all of their patients on SUDEP, 8.7% counseled most of the time (50-90%), 20.8% sometimes (10-49%), 44.5% rarely (1-9%), and 23.3% reported not counseling about SUDEP at all. In contrast, 92.9% reported that they counseled all patients about driving restrictions and 81.5% about risks in daily life activities. Suicidal ideations were discussed in 59.0% for some and in 3.3% for all patients, whereas 35.1% of respondents reported never discussing suicidal ideations. Independent predictors of not discussing SUDEP were no additional epilepsy training, no or uncertain SUDEP cases in the past, <10 years in practice, <25 epilepsy patients seen per quarter, and the opinion of a lack of consequences in SUDEP prevention. The opinion that SUDEP is a risk factor in particular patient groups and the attitude that all risks should be discussed predicted counseling on SUDEP. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings show a discrepancy between guidelines and practice regarding the discussion of premature mortality due to SUDEP or suicidality. Both are not discussed at all by a substantial proportion of neurologists and neuropediatricians. This is in contrast to ubiquitous education about driving restrictions. Dissemination of knowledge among physicians about potential preventive strategies might increase the likelihood of discussion. Clinical practice guidelines are welcomed by the majority of physicians in this process. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
© 2016 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Counseling; Driving; Drowning; Epilepsy; Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy patients; Suicide

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26899504     DOI: 10.1111/epi.13337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  11 in total

1.  Living With Epilepsy: It's Not Just a Matter of Quality.

Authors:  Chad Carlson
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.500

2.  Summary of the 2016 Partners Against Mortality in Epilepsy (PAME) Conference.

Authors: 
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.500

Review 3.  Autonomic aspects of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP).

Authors:  Niravkumar Barot; Maromi Nei
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.435

4.  Probable Sudden Unexpected Death in Dogs With Epilepsy (pSUDED).

Authors:  Enrice Huenerfauth; Jasmin Nessler; Johannes Erath; Andrea Tipold
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-04-27

5.  The Burden of Severely Drug-Refractory Epilepsy: A Comparative Longitudinal Evaluation of Mortality, Morbidity, Resource Use, and Cost Using German Health Insurance Data.

Authors:  Adam Strzelczyk; Claudia Griebel; Wolfram Lux; Felix Rosenow; Jens-Peter Reese
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 6.  A systematic review on the burden of illness in individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC).

Authors:  Johann Philipp Zöllner; David Neal Franz; Christoph Hertzberg; Rima Nabbout; Felix Rosenow; Matthias Sauter; Susanne Schubert-Bast; Adelheid Wiemer-Kruel; Adam Strzelczyk
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 7.  [SUDEP in brief - knowledge and practice recommendations on sudden unexpected death in epilepsy].

Authors:  Rainer Surges; Stefan Conrad; Hajo M Hamer; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Anke M Staack; Bernhard J Steinhoff; Adam Strzelczyk; Eugen Trinka
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 8.  Would people living with epilepsy benefit from palliative care?

Authors:  Benzi M Kluger; Cornelia Drees; Thomas R Wodushek; Lauren Frey; Laura Strom; Mesha-Gay Brown; Jacquelyn L Bainbridge; Sarah N Fischer; Archana Shrestha; Mark Spitz
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.337

9.  Has the Time Come to Stratify and Score SUDEP Risk to Inform People With Epilepsy of Their Changes in Safety?

Authors:  Rohit Shankar; Craig Newman; Alistair Gales; Brendan N McLean; Jane Hanna; Samantha Ashby; Matthew C Walker; Josemir W Sander
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Why child neurologists talk about SUDEP: Results from two cross-sectional surveys.

Authors:  Anne E Keller; Robyn Whitney; Elizabeth J Donner
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2021-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.