| Literature DB >> 26899475 |
Wei Wei1, Xiaoming Li1, Xiaoming Tu2, Junfeng Zhao3, Guoxiang Zhao3.
Abstract
Some previous studies have revealed a negative impact of enacted stigma on post-traumatic growth (PTG) of children affected by HIV/AIDS, but little is known about protective psychological factors that can mitigate the effect of enacted stigma on children's PTG. This study aims to examine the mediating effects of perceived social support, hopefulness, and emotional regulation on the relationship between enacted stigma and PTG among HIV-affected children. Cross-sectional data were collected from 790 children affected by parental HIV (382 girls, 408 boys) aged 6-17 years in 2012 in rural central China. Multiple regression was conducted to test the mediation model. The study found that the experience of enacted stigma had a negative effect on PTG among children affected by HIV/AIDS. Emotional regulation together with hopefulness and perceived social support mediated the impact of enacted stigma on PTG. Perceived social support, hopefulness, and emotional regulation offer multiple levels of protection that can mitigate the impact of enacted stigma on PTG. Results suggest that future psychological intervention programs should seek strategies to reduce the stigmatizing experience of these children and promote children's level of PTG, and health professionals should also emphasize the development of these protective psychological factors.Entities:
Keywords: China; Enacted stigma; children affected by HIV/AIDS; emotional regulation; hopefulness; perceived social support; post-traumatic growth
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26899475 PMCID: PMC4828627 DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1146217
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Care ISSN: 0954-0121
Figure 1. Hypothesized model.
Means, standard deviations, Cronbach's alpha, and correlations (N = 790).
| Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Cronbach's alpha | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Enacted stigma | 1.78 (0.76) | – | .80 | ||||
| 2. Post-traumatic growth | 2.77 (0.61) | −.12** | – | .77 | |||
| 3. Perceived social support | 2.73 (0.56) | −.07* | .27** | – | .87 | ||
| 4. Hopefulness | 2.82 (0.68) | −.14** | .27** | .34** | – | .73 | |
| 5. Emotional regulation | 2.73 (0.56) | −.18** | .36** | .36** | .33** | – | − .80 |
| 6. Age | 10.51 (1.98) | −.17** | .002 | .02 | .11** | .05 |
* p < .05.
** p < .01
Summary of indirect effects and confidence intervals of three mediators (N = 790).
| Mediators | Indirect effects | Boot SE | Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Perceived social support | − 0.02** | 0.01 | − 0.03 | − 0.01 |
| 2. Hopefulness | −0.03** | 0.01 | −0.05 | −0.01 |
| 3. Emotional regulation | −0.05** | 0.02 | −0.08 | −0.02 |
* p < .05.
** p < .01.
Figure 2. Final path model showing the indirect effect of enacted stigma on PTG via PSS, hopefulness, and emotional regulation.