Wen-Qi Diao1, Ning Shen2, Pan-Xi Yu3, Bei-Bei Liu2, Bei He4. 1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. Electronic address: 424259600@qq.com. 2. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. 3. Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 4. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. Electronic address: puh3_hb@bjmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Data on the efficacy of the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV-23) in preventing adult community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) among the target population of individuals aged over 65 years and high-risk individuals aged 19-64 years are conflicting. As the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has recently demonstrated PPV-23 is likely beneficial to immunocompromised adults by the Grading, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, we conducted meta-analysis to examine its efficacy in an immunocompetent population. METHODS: We searched the PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized trials. Overall relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidential intervals (CIs) were calculated, and the Cochrane Q test (p, I(2)) was performed. Outcomes were assessed by the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Seven randomized trials involving 156,010 participants were included in this meta-analysis. High-quality evidence revealed that PPV-23 was weakly associated with the prevention of all-cause pneumonia ([RR] 0.87, [95%CI] 0.76-0.98, p=0.11, I(2)=43%), especially among the target population ([RR] 0.72, [95%CI] 0.69-0.94, p=0.58 I(2)=0%), the elderly group aged over 40 years ([RR] 0.80, [95%CI] 0.69-0.94) and the Japanese population ([RR] 0.72, [95%CI] 0.59-0.88, p=0.24, I(2)=30%). The target population included adults aged over 65 years and patients at high risk of pneumonia due to chronic lung disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or living in a nursing home. Protective trends of PPV-23 in the outcomes of pneumococcal pneumonia ([RR] 0.54, [95%CI] 0.18-1.65, p=0.01, I(2)=77%) and mortality due to pneumonia ([RR] 0.67, [95%CI] 0.43-1.04, p=0.67, I(2)=0%) were observed, although the results were statistically insignificant, possibly due to the small number of trials included. PPV-23 did not prevent all-cause mortality ([RR] 1.04, [95%CI] 0.87-1.24, p=0.95, I(2)=0%). CONCLUSIONS: PPV-23 provided weak protection against all-cause pneumonia in an immunocompetent population, especially among the target population. The additional benefit of PPV-23 in preventing CAP further supports its application in the target population.
BACKGROUND: Data on the efficacy of the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV-23) in preventing adult community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) among the target population of individuals aged over 65 years and high-risk individuals aged 19-64 years are conflicting. As the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has recently demonstrated PPV-23 is likely beneficial to immunocompromised adults by the Grading, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, we conducted meta-analysis to examine its efficacy in an immunocompetent population. METHODS: We searched the PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized trials. Overall relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidential intervals (CIs) were calculated, and the Cochrane Q test (p, I(2)) was performed. Outcomes were assessed by the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Seven randomized trials involving 156,010 participants were included in this meta-analysis. High-quality evidence revealed that PPV-23 was weakly associated with the prevention of all-cause pneumonia ([RR] 0.87, [95%CI] 0.76-0.98, p=0.11, I(2)=43%), especially among the target population ([RR] 0.72, [95%CI] 0.69-0.94, p=0.58 I(2)=0%), the elderly group aged over 40 years ([RR] 0.80, [95%CI] 0.69-0.94) and the Japanese population ([RR] 0.72, [95%CI] 0.59-0.88, p=0.24, I(2)=30%). The target population included adults aged over 65 years and patients at high risk of pneumonia due to chronic lung disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or living in a nursing home. Protective trends of PPV-23 in the outcomes of pneumococcal pneumonia ([RR] 0.54, [95%CI] 0.18-1.65, p=0.01, I(2)=77%) and mortality due to pneumonia ([RR] 0.67, [95%CI] 0.43-1.04, p=0.67, I(2)=0%) were observed, although the results were statistically insignificant, possibly due to the small number of trials included. PPV-23 did not prevent all-cause mortality ([RR] 1.04, [95%CI] 0.87-1.24, p=0.95, I(2)=0%). CONCLUSIONS:PPV-23 provided weak protection against all-cause pneumonia in an immunocompetent population, especially among the target population. The additional benefit of PPV-23 in preventing CAP further supports its application in the target population.
Authors: Alan Kaplan; Pierre Arsenault; Brian Aw; Vivien Brown; George Fox; Ron Grossman; Taj Jadavji; Craig Laferrière; Suzanne Levitz; Mark Loeb; Andrew McIvor; Christopher H Mody; Yannick Poulin; Marla Shapiro; Dominique Tessier; Francois Théorêt; Karl Weiss; John Yaremko; George Zhanel Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Gerhard Falkenhorst; Cornelius Remschmidt; Thomas Harder; Eva Hummers-Pradier; Ole Wichmann; Christian Bogdan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jung Yeon Heo; Yu Bin Seo; Won Suk Choi; Jacob Lee; Ji Yun Noh; Hye Won Jeong; Woo Joo Kim; Min Ja Kim; Hee Young Lee; Joon Young Song Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 3.240