Anubha Gupta1, Ziad Hussein2, Raffit Hassan3, Jason Wustner4, Julia D Maltzman5, Bruce A Wallin4. 1. Clinical Pharmacology, Eisai Limited, European Knowledge Centre, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9SN, UK. 2. Clinical Pharmacology, Eisai Limited, European Knowledge Centre, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9SN, UK. ziad_hussein@eisai.net. 3. Thoracic and GI Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. Morphotek, Inc., Exton, PA, USA. 5. Former Employee of Morphotek, Inc., Exton, PA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To characterize amatuximab pharmacokinetics (PK) and the relationship of amatuximab exposure with response in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) receiving amatuximab with pemetrexed and cisplatin. METHODS: A nonlinear mixed effects PK model was built using data from all of the amatuximab studies conducted to date. Patients received amatuximab alone or in combination with chemotherapy. The influence of demographic, laboratory and disease characteristics on PK parameters was assessed. Exposure-response analyses explored relationships between amatuximab exposure and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Alternative amatuximab dosing regimens were explored with simulations using population PK and parametric survival models. RESULTS: Amatuximab PK was best described by a two-compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination pathways. Body weight and an antidrug antibodies reaction with the titer >64 affected volume of distribution and clearance, respectively. Exposure-response analyses demonstrated that the amatuximab exposure (C min) showed a significant effect on OS (log-rank test, P = 0.0202). For patients with amatuximab C min above the median (38.2 μg/mL), the median OS was 583 days (90 % CI 418 -NE). For patients with C min ≤ 38.2 μg/mL, the median OS was 375 days (90 % CI 325-486). The amatuximab exposure showed similar significant effect on PFS. Exposure-response analysis for adverse events did not reveal any relationship. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MPM, higher amatuximab exposure in combination with chemotherapy was shown to be associated with longer OS, supporting evaluation of more frequent dosing in future trials to achieve higher exposure and subsequently longer OS.
PURPOSE: To characterize amatuximab pharmacokinetics (PK) and the relationship of amatuximab exposure with response in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) receiving amatuximab with pemetrexed and cisplatin. METHODS: A nonlinear mixed effects PK model was built using data from all of the amatuximab studies conducted to date. Patients received amatuximab alone or in combination with chemotherapy. The influence of demographic, laboratory and disease characteristics on PK parameters was assessed. Exposure-response analyses explored relationships between amatuximab exposure and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Alternative amatuximab dosing regimens were explored with simulations using population PK and parametric survival models. RESULTS:Amatuximab PK was best described by a two-compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination pathways. Body weight and an antidrug antibodies reaction with the titer >64 affected volume of distribution and clearance, respectively. Exposure-response analyses demonstrated that the amatuximab exposure (C min) showed a significant effect on OS (log-rank test, P = 0.0202). For patients with amatuximab C min above the median (38.2 μg/mL), the median OS was 583 days (90 % CI 418 -NE). For patients with C min ≤ 38.2 μg/mL, the median OS was 375 days (90 % CI 325-486). The amatuximab exposure showed similar significant effect on PFS. Exposure-response analysis for adverse events did not reveal any relationship. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MPM, higher amatuximab exposure in combination with chemotherapy was shown to be associated with longer OS, supporting evaluation of more frequent dosing in future trials to achieve higher exposure and subsequently longer OS.
Entities:
Keywords:
Amatuximab; Malignant pleural mesothelioma; Monoclonal antibody; Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling
Authors: Raffit Hassan; Zoltan G Laszik; Megan Lerner; Mark Raffeld; Russell Postier; Daniel Brackett Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: P Argani; C Iacobuzio-Donahue; B Ryu; C Rosty; M Goggins; R E Wilentz; S R Murugesan; S D Leach; E Jaffee; C J Yeo; J L Cameron; S E Kern; R H Hruban Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Nicholas J Vogelzang; James J Rusthoven; James Symanowski; Claude Denham; E Kaukel; Pierre Ruffie; Ulrich Gatzemeier; Michael Boyer; Salih Emri; Christian Manegold; Clet Niyikiza; Paolo Paoletti Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-07-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Raffit Hassan; Wolfgang Ebel; Eric L Routhier; Rina Patel; J Bradford Kline; Jingli Zhang; Qimin Chao; Sara Jacob; Howard Turchin; Lester Gibbs; Martin D Phillips; Shiyama Mudali; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Maria Moreno; Ira Pastan; Philip M Sass; Nicholas C Nicolaides; Luigi Grasso Journal: Cancer Immun Date: 2007-12-19
Authors: Nicholas C Nicolaides; Charles Schweizer; Elizabeth B Somers; Wenquan Wang; Shawn Fernando; Erin N Ross; Luigi Grasso; Raffit Hassan; J Bradford Kline Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 4.742