Literature DB >> 26897931

Short-Term Surgical Outcomes and Experience with 925 Patients Undergoing Robotic Cholecystectomy During A 4-Year Period At A Single Institution.

Nam Hyun Baek, GuangYi Li, Ji Hun Kim, Jae Chul Hwang, Jin Hong Kim, Byung Moo Yoo, Wook Hwan Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Robotic cholecystectomy has emerged as an established technique for the treatment of gallbladder disease. We report our experience and surgical results of RC for patients with gallbladder polyps or minimal symptomatic gallstones, and with inflamed gallbladder diseases including acute cholecystitis, empyematous cholecystitis, and gangrenous cholecystitis.
METHODOLOGY: 925 patients with gallbladder disease were selected to undergo RC at our institution. All procedures were performed using the da Vinci system. No technical difficulty in RC was experienced. Use these advantages, we performed cholecystectomy by placing the trocars transversally on the bikini line('Panty line', 'Bikini line').
RESULTS: From June 2010 to May 2014, 925 gallbladder disease patients underwent RC on the bikini line. Excluding the effects of BMI produced no correlation between operating time and white blood cell count (r = 0.062, p = 0.058). Surgical complications occurred in nine of the 925 patients (0.1%), including cystic duct leakage (n = 4), bleeding (n = 3), common bile duct injury (n = 1), and bladder injury (n = 1). Conversion to open cholecystectomy occurred in one patient due to common bile duct injury (0.01%).
CONCLUSION: RC is technically an easy to learn, safe method of patients with gallbladder disease, regardless of BMI. In addition, RC can be a treatment for patients with acute inflammation in gallbladder disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26897931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  5 in total

1.  Outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease in Veteran patients.

Authors:  Zoe Tao; Valerie-Sue Emuakhagbon; Thai Pham; M Mathew Augustine; Angela Guzzetta; Sergio Huerta
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-05

Review 2.  [Robotic approach to hepatobiliary surgery. German version].

Authors:  L F Gonzalez-Ciccarelli; P Quadri; D Daskalaki; L Milone; A Gangemi; P C Giulianotti
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Robotic approach to hepatobiliary surgery.

Authors:  L F Gonzalez-Ciccarelli; P Quadri; D Daskalaki; L Milone; A Gangemi; P C Giulianotti
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  A retrospective comparison of robotic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operative outcomes and cost analysis.

Authors:  David S Strosberg; Michelle C Nguyen; Peter Muscarella; Vimal K Narula
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Robotic compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A propensity matched analysis.

Authors:  William J Kane; Eric J Charles; J Hunter Mehaffey; Robert B Hawkins; Kathleen B Meneses; Carlos A Tache-Leon; Zequan Yang
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.982

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.