Literature DB >> 26897245

Antimicrobial drug use and risk factors associated with treatment incidence and mortality in Swiss veal calves reared under improved welfare conditions.

M Lava1, G Schüpbach-Regula2, A Steiner1, M Meylan3.   

Abstract

Ninety-one Swiss veal farms producing under a label with improved welfare standards were visited between August and December 2014 to investigate risk factors related to antimicrobial drug use and mortality. All herds consisted of own and purchased calves, with a median of 77.4% of purchased calves. The calves' mean age was 29±15days at purchasing and the fattening period lasted at average 120±28 days. The mean carcass weight was 125±12kg. A mean of 58±33 calves were fattened per farm and year, and purchased calves were bought from a mean of 20±17 farms of origin. Antimicrobial drug treatment incidence was calculated with the defined daily dose methodology. The mean treatment incidence (TIADD) was 21±15 daily doses per calf and year. The mean mortality risk was 4.1%, calves died at a mean age of 94±50 days, and the main causes of death were bovine respiratory disease (BRD, 50%) and gastro-intestinal disease (33%). Two multivariable models were constructed, for antimicrobial drug treatment incidence (53 farms) and mortality (91 farms). No quarantine, shared air space for several groups of calves, and no clinical examination upon arrival at the farm were associated with increased antimicrobial treatment incidence. Maximum group size and weight differences >100kg within a group were associated with increased mortality risk, while vaccination and beef breed were associated with decreased mortality risk. The majority of antimicrobial treatments (84.6%) were given as group treatments with oral powder fed through an automatic milk feeding system. Combination products containing chlortetracycline with tylosin and sulfadimidine or with spiramycin were used for 54.9%, and amoxicillin for 43.7% of the oral group treatments. The main indication for individual treatment was BRD (73%). The mean age at the time of treatment was 51 days, corresponding to an estimated weight of 80-100kg. Individual treatments were mainly applied through injections (88.5%), and included administration of fluoroquinolones in 38.3%, penicillines (amoxicillin or benzylpenicillin) in 25.6%, macrolides in 13.1%, tetracyclines in 12.0%, 3th and 4th generation cephalosporines in 4.7%, and florfenicol in 3.9% of the cases. The present study allowed for identifying risk factors for increased antimicrobial drug treatment and mortality. This is an important basis for future studies aiming at reducing treatment incidence and mortality in veal farms. Our results indicate that improvement is needed in the selection of drugs for the treatment of veal calves according to the principles of prudent use of antibiotics.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Defined daily dose; Group treatment; Individual treatment; Quarantine; Treatment intensity; Vaccination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26897245     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  19 in total

1.  Risk factors for poor health outcomes for male dairy calves undergoing transportation in western Canada.

Authors:  Devon J Wilson; Jane Stojkov; David L Renaud; David Fraser
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Rapid Identification of Mycoplasma bovis Strains from Bovine Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid with Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry after Enrichment Procedure.

Authors:  Bart Pardon; Filip Boyen; Jade Bokma; Laura Van Driessche; Piet Deprez; Freddy Haesebrouck; Marianne Vahl; Eefke Weesendorp; Ruud H Deurenberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Ultrasonography of the cranial part of the thorax is a quick and sensitive technique to detect lung consolidation in veal calves.

Authors:  Nicolas Masset; Sébastien Assié; Nicolas Herman; Thibault Jozan; Vincent Herry
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2022-02-26

Review 4.  Addressing Antimicrobial Resistance: An Overview of Priority Actions to Prevent Suboptimal Antimicrobial Use in Food-Animal Production.

Authors:  Guillaume Lhermie; Yrjö T Gröhn; Didier Raboisson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Extrapolating Antibiotic Sales to Number of Treated Animals: Treatments in Pigs and Calves in Switzerland, 2011-2015.

Authors:  Rosa Stebler; Luís P Carmo; Dagmar Heim; Hanspeter Naegeli; Klaus Eichler; Cedric R Muentener
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-09-20

6.  Monitoring Antibiotic Usage in German Dairy and Beef Cattle Farms-A Longitudinal Analysis.

Authors:  Katharina Hommerich; Inga Ruddat; Maria Hartmann; Nicole Werner; Annemarie Käsbohrer; Lothar Kreienbrock
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-07-26

7.  Biosecurity practices in Belgian veal calf farming: Level of implementation, attitudes, strengths, weaknesses and constraints.

Authors:  Bert Damiaans; Véronique Renault; Steven Sarrazin; Anna Catharina Berge; Bart Pardon; Stefaan Ribbens; Claude Saegerman; Jeroen Dewulf
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 2.670

8.  Veterinary Expert Opinion on Potential Drivers and Opportunities for Changing Antimicrobial Usage Practices in Livestock in Denmark, Portugal, and Switzerland.

Authors:  Luís P Carmo; Liza R Nielsen; Lis Alban; Paulo M da Costa; Gertraud Schüpbach-Regula; Ioannis Magouras
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-01

9.  Expert opinion on livestock antimicrobial usage indications and patterns in Denmark, Portugal and Switzerland.

Authors:  Luís Pedro Carmo; Ilias Bouzalas; Liza Rosenbaum Nielsen; Lis Alban; Paulo Martins da Costa; Cedric Müntener; Gertraud Schüpbach; Yandy Abreu; Ioannis Magouras
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2018-09-11

10.  A register-based study of the antimicrobial usage in Danish veal calves and young bulls.

Authors:  Mette Fertner; Nils Toft; Henrik Læssøe Martin; Anette Boklund
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.670

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.