Literature DB >> 26896770

Peroxisomes in parasitic protists.

Toni Gabaldón1, Michael L Ginger2, Paul A M Michels3.   

Abstract

Representatives of all major lineages of eukaryotes contain peroxisomes with similar morphology and mode of biogenesis, indicating a monophyletic origin of the organelles within the common ancestor of all eukaryotes. Peroxisomes originated from the endoplasmic reticulum, but despite a common origin and shared morphological features, peroxisomes from different organisms show a remarkable diversity of enzyme content and the metabolic processes present can vary dependent on nutritional or developmental conditions. A common characteristic and probable evolutionary driver for the origin of the organelle is an involvement in lipid metabolism, notably H2O2-dependent fatty-acid oxidation. Subsequent evolution of the organelle in different lineages involved multiple acquisitions of metabolic processes-often involving retargeting enzymes from other cell compartments-and losses. Information about peroxisomes in protists is still scarce, but available evidence, including new bioinformatics data reported here, indicate striking diversity amongst free-living and parasitic protists from different phylogenetic supergroups. Peroxisomes in only some protists show major involvement in H2O2-dependent metabolism, as in peroxisomes of mammalian, plant and fungal cells. Compartmentalization of glycolytic and gluconeogenic enzymes inside peroxisomes is characteristic of kinetoplastids and diplonemids, where the organelles are hence called glycosomes, whereas several other excavate parasites (Giardia, Trichomonas) have lost peroxisomes. Amongst alveolates and amoebozoans patterns of peroxisome loss are more complicated. Often, a link is apparent between the niches occupied by the parasitic protists, nutrient availability, and the absence of the organelles or their presence with a specific enzymatic content. In trypanosomatids, essentiality of peroxisomes may be considered for use in anti-parasite drug discovery. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evolution; Fatty-acid metabolism; Metabolic diversity; Peroxide metabolism; Peroxisome; Protist

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26896770     DOI: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2016.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol        ISSN: 0166-6851            Impact factor:   1.759


  23 in total

1.  Inorganic polyphosphate interacts with nucleolar and glycosomal proteins in trypanosomatids.

Authors:  Raquel S Negreiros; Noelia Lander; Guozhong Huang; Ciro D Cordeiro; Stephanie A Smith; James H Morrissey; Roberto Docampo
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.501

2.  Anaerobic peroxisomes in Mastigamoeba balamuthi.

Authors:  Tien Le; Vojtěch Žárský; Eva Nývltová; Petr Rada; Karel Harant; Marie Vancová; Zdeněk Verner; Ivan Hrdý; Jan Tachezy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Distribution and Evolution of Peroxisomes in Alveolates (Apicomplexa, Dinoflagellates, Ciliates).

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Ludewig-Klingner; Victoria Michael; Michael Jarek; Henner Brinkmann; Jörn Petersen
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.416

4.  Genomic and Proteomic Evidence for the Presence of a Peroxisome in the Apicomplexan Parasite Toxoplasma gondii and Other Coccidia.

Authors:  Daniel Moog; Jude M Przyborski; Uwe G Maier
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 5.  A paradigm shift: The mitoproteomes of procyclic and bloodstream Trypanosoma brucei are comparably complex.

Authors:  Alena Zíková; Zdeněk Verner; Anna Nenarokova; Paul A M Michels; Julius Lukeš
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 6.823

Review 6.  Glycosome biogenesis in trypanosomes and the de novo dilemma.

Authors:  Sarah Bauer; Meredith T Morris
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-04-20

7.  Comparative Genomics of Peroxisome Biogenesis Proteins: Making Sense of the PEX Proteins.

Authors:  Renate L M Jansen; Carlos Santana-Molina; Marco van den Noort; Damien P Devos; Ida J van der Klei
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-05-20

8.  Shedding light on the expansion and diversification of the Cdc48 protein family during the rise of the eukaryotic cell.

Authors:  Nickias Kienle; Tobias H Kloepper; Dirk Fasshauer
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Extreme genome diversity in the hyper-prevalent parasitic eukaryote Blastocystis.

Authors:  Eleni Gentekaki; Bruce A Curtis; Courtney W Stairs; Vladimír Klimeš; Marek Eliáš; Dayana E Salas-Leiva; Emily K Herman; Laura Eme; Maria C Arias; Bernard Henrissat; Frédérique Hilliou; Mary J Klute; Hiroshi Suga; Shehre-Banoo Malik; Arthur W Pightling; Martin Kolisko; Richard A Rachubinski; Alexander Schlacht; Darren M Soanes; Anastasios D Tsaousis; John M Archibald; Steven G Ball; Joel B Dacks; C Graham Clark; Mark van der Giezen; Andrew J Roger
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Kinetic and structural studies of Trypanosoma and Leishmania phosphofructokinases show evolutionary divergence and identify AMP as a switch regulating glycolysis versus gluconeogenesis.

Authors:  Peter M Fernandes; James Kinkead; Iain W McNae; Monserrat Vásquez-Valdivieso; Martin A Wear; Paul A M Michels; Malcolm D Walkinshaw
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 5.542

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.