Literature DB >> 26896629

Lesion correlates of impairments in actual tool use following unilateral brain damage.

E Salazar-López1, B J Schwaiger2, J Hermsdörfer3.   

Abstract

To understand how the brain controls actions involving tools, tests have been developed employing different paradigms such as pantomime, imitation and real tool use. The relevant areas have been localized in the premotor cortex, the middle temporal gyrus and the superior and inferior parietal lobe. This study employs Voxel Lesion Symptom Mapping to relate the functional impairment in actual tool use with extent and localization of the structural damage in the left (LBD, N=31) and right (RBD, N=19) hemisphere in chronic stroke patients. A series of 12 tools was presented to participants in a carousel. In addition, a non-tool condition tested the prescribed manipulation of a bar. The execution was scored according to an apraxic error scale based on the dimensions grasp, movement, direction and space. Results in the LBD group show that the ventro-dorsal stream constitutes the core of the defective network responsible for impaired tool use; it is composed of the inferior parietal lobe, the supramarginal and angular gyrus and the dorsal premotor cortex. In addition, involvement of regions in the temporal lobe, the rolandic operculum, the ventral premotor cortex and the middle occipital gyrus provide evidence of the role of the ventral stream in this task. Brain areas related to the use of the bar largely overlapped with this network. For patients with RBD data were less conclusive; however, a trend for the involvement of the temporal lobe in apraxic errors was manifested. Skilled bar manipulation depended on the same temporal area in these patients. Therefore, actual tool use depends on a well described left fronto-parietal-temporal network. RBD affects actual tool use, however the underlying neural processes may be more widely distributed and more heterogeneous. Goal directed manipulation of non-tool objects seems to involve very similar brain areas as tool use, suggesting that both types of manipulation share identical processes and neural representations.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apraxia; Brain damage; Lesion mapping; Tool use

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26896629     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Networks involved in motor cognition : Physiology and pathophysiology of apraxia].

Authors:  M Martin; J Hermsdörfer; S Bohlhalter; P H Weiss
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Task- and domain-specific modulation of functional connectivity in the ventral and dorsal object-processing pathways.

Authors:  Frank E Garcea; Quanjing Chen; Roger Vargas; Darren A Narayan; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  Differential Tuning of Ventral and Dorsal Streams during the Generation of Common and Uncommon Tool Uses.

Authors:  Heath E Matheson; Laurel J Buxbaum; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Pantomime of tool use: looking beyond apraxia.

Authors:  François Osiurak; Emanuelle Reynaud; Josselin Baumard; Yves Rossetti; Angela Bartolo; Mathieu Lesourd
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2021-10-30

5.  The cortical thickness of the area PF of the left inferior parietal cortex mediates technical-reasoning skills.

Authors:  Giovanni Federico; Emanuelle Reynaud; Jordan Navarro; Mathieu Lesourd; Vivien Gaujoux; Franck Lamberton; Danièle Ibarrola; Carlo Cavaliere; Vincenzo Alfano; Marco Aiello; Marco Salvatore; Perrine Seguin; Damien Schnebelen; Maria Antonella Brandimonte; Yves Rossetti; François Osiurak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  It takes two to pantomime: Communication meets motor cognition.

Authors:  Lisa Finkel; Katharina Hogrefe; Scott H Frey; Georg Goldenberg; Jennifer Randerath
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.881

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.