| Literature DB >> 26895959 |
Gaoxiang Ma1, Qinbo Yuan1, Qiangdong Wang2, Mulong Du1, Haiyan Chu1, Zhenjia Dong2, Xu Xiao2, Meilin Wang1, Chao Qin3, Changjun Yin3, Zhengdong Zhang4, Wei Zhang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located at lncRNA may affect the stability and splicing processes of mRNA formation, which result in the alteration of its interacting partners. The SNP rs755622 within exon of antisense lncRNA MIF- AS and promoter of MIF was implicated in renal disease risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this case-control study, we genotyped the SNP rs755622 in 230 patients diagnosed with nephrolithiasis and 250 controls in a Chinese population. RESULTS We found that the rs755622 CG and CC genotypes had a significantly increased nephrolithiasis risk (adjusted OR=1.52, 95% CI=1.03-2.25; OR=2.63, 95% CI=1.21-5.72, P=0.015), compared with GG genotype in the additive model. The rs755622 C carriers (GC/CC) had an adjusted OR (95% CI) of 1.65 (1.14-2.39, P=0.016), compared with the GG genotype in the dominant model. This hazardous effect was more pronounced in subgroup age >46, BMI >24, hypertension, ever smoking, and ever drinking subjects. Moreover, we found that rs755622 could modulate the function of MIF-AS by influencing its folding. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that the MIF-AS rs755622 polymorphism may have a crucial role in the development of nephrolithiasis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26895959 PMCID: PMC4763806 DOI: 10.12659/msm.895818
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
The characteristics description of kidney stone and controls.
| Variables | Cases n=230 (%) | Controls n=250 (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 46.7±12.5 | 45.9 ±12.5 | |
| ≤46 | 109 (47.4) | 134 (53.6) | 0.174 |
| >46 | 121 (52.6) | 116 (46.4) | |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 150 (65.2) | 166 (66.4) | 0.785 |
| Female | 80 (34.8) | 84 (33.6) | |
| BMI | |||
| ≤24 | 111 (48.3) | 127 (50.8) | 0.578 |
| >24 | 119 (51.7) | 123 (49.2) | |
| Hypertension | |||
| Yes | 59 (25.7) | 46 (18.4) | 0.055 |
| No | 171 (74.3) | 204 (81.6) | |
| Diabetes | |||
| Yes | 17 (7.4) | 19 (7.6) | 0.931 |
| No | 213 (92.6) | 231 (92.4) | |
| Smoking status | |||
| Ever | 103 (44.8) | 76 (30.4) | 0.001 |
| Never | 127 (55.2) | 174 (69.6) | |
| Drinking status | |||
| Ever | 88 (38.3) | 93 (37.2) | 0.811 |
| Never | 142 (61.7) | 157 (62.8) | |
Genotype and allele frequencies of MIF rs755622 among cases and controls and their associations with kidney stone risk.
| MIF rs755622 | Cases (n=230) | Controls (n=250) | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG | 110 | 147 | 0.015 | 1.57 (1.16–2.12) |
| GC | 98 | 92 | 1.52 (1.03–2.25) | |
| CC | 22 | 11 | 2.63 (1.21–5.72) | |
| GC+CC | 120 | 103 | 0.016 | 1.65 (1.14–2.39) |
| GG+GC | 208 | 239 | 1.00 (ref.) | |
| CC | 22 | 11 | 0.026 | 2.21 (1.03–4.71) |
| Trend | 0.005 |
P for two-sided χ2 test;
Adjusted for age, sex and smoking status in logistic regression model.
Stratification analyses of MIF rs755622 SNP association with kidney stone risk.
| Characteristics | Cases (n=230) | Controls (n=250) | OR (95% CI)a | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG | GC+CC | GG | GC+CC | ||||
| Age (years) | |||||||
| ≤46 | 55 | 54 | 75 | 59 | 1.32 (0.78–2.21) | 0.300 | 0.221 |
| >46 | 55 | 66 | 72 | 44 | |||
| Sex | |||||||
| Male | 67 | 83 | 95 | 71 | 0.663 | ||
| Female | 43 | 37 | 52 | 32 | 1.51 (0.79–2.87) | 0.213 | |
| BMI | |||||||
| ≤24 | 57 | 54 | 70 | 57 | 1.12 (0.66–1.91) | 0.676 | 0.115 |
| >24 | 53 | 66 | 77 | 46 | |||
| Hypertension | |||||||
| Yes | 35 | 24 | 27 | 19 | 0.163 | ||
| No | 75 | 96 | 120 | 84 | 1.46 (0.89–3.65) | 0.413 | |
| Smoking status | |||||||
| Ever | 48 | 55 | 48 | 28 | 0.367 | ||
| Never | 62 | 65 | 99 | 75 | 1.55 (0.96–2.48) | 0.072 | |
| Drinking status | |||||||
| Ever | 35 | 53 | 55 | 38 | 0.151 | ||
| Never | 75 | 67 | 92 | 65 | 1.35 (0.85–2.16) | 0.206 | |
Adjusted for age, sex and smoking status in logistic regression model;
P for heterogeneity test.
Figure 1Influence of rs755622 on MIF-AS local folding structures. The local structure changes were illustrated by RNAfold (A) and SNPfold (B), respectively. The arrow (A) indicates the position of rs755622. The black line (B) represents the SNP rs755622 G allele sequences, whereas the red line represents the C allele. The blue line (B) indicates the position of rs755622.