Literature DB >> 26895920

Effects of intraoperative protective lung ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with laparoscopic surgery: prospective, randomized and controlled trial.

S J Park1,2, B G Kim1,2, A H Oh1,2, S H Han1,2, H S Han3, J H Ryu4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Respiratory functions are usually impaired during pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. This randomized, controlled and single-blinded study was performed to evaluate whether intraoperative protective lung ventilation influences postoperative pulmonary complications after laparoscopic hepatobiliary surgery.
METHODS: Sixty-two patients were randomized to receive either conventional ventilation with alveolar recruitment maneuver (tidal volume of 10 ml/kg with inspiratory pressure of 40 cmH2O for 30 s after the end of pneumoperitoneum, group R), or protective lung ventilation (low tidal volume of 6 ml/kg with positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] of 5 cmH2O, group P). Induction and maintenance of anesthesia were done with balanced anesthesia. Respiratory complications such as atelectasis, pneumonia or desaturation were observed postoperatively. The length of hospital stay, arterial blood gas analysis, peak inspiratory pressure and hemodynamic variables were also recorded. Results are presented as mean ± SD or number of patients (%).
RESULTS: Postoperative pulmonary complications (P = 0.023) and desaturation below 90 % (P = 0.016) occurred less frequently in group P than in group R. Eight patients of group R and 3 patients of group P showed atelectasis. Pneumonia was diagnosed in 1 patient of group R. No differences were observed in the length of hospital stay, arterial blood gas analysis (pH, PaO2, PaCO2 and PAO2) and hemodynamic variables except PAO2, AaDO2 and peak inspiratory pressure between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Protective lung ventilation (low tidal volume with PEEP) during pneumoperitoneum was associated with less incidences of pulmonary complications than conventional ventilation with alveolar recruitment maneuver after laparoscopic hepatobiliary surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alveolar recruitment maneuver; Laparoscopic surgery; Pneumoperitoneum; Protective lung ventilation; Pulmonary complication

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26895920     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4797-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  22 in total

1.  Intraoperative recruitment maneuver reverses detrimental pneumoperitoneum-induced respiratory effects in healthy weight and obese patients undergoing laparoscopy.

Authors:  Emmanuel Futier; Jean-Michel Constantin; Paolo Pelosi; Gerald Chanques; Fabrice Kwiatkoskwi; Samir Jaber; Jean-Etienne Bazin
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Factors associated with prolonged stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients.

Authors:  Shih-Ping Cheng; Yuan-Ching Chang; Chien-Liang Liu; Tsen-Long Yang; Kuo-Shyang Jeng; Jie-Jen Lee; Tsang-Pai Liu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Beneficial effects of high positive end-expiratory pressure in lung respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  L F Maracajá-Neto; N Verçosa; A C Roncally; A Giannella; F A Bozza; M A Lessa
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  Positive end-expiratory pressure improves arterial oxygenation during prolonged pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  D Meininger; C Byhahn; S Mierdl; K Westphal; B Zwissler
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.105

Review 5.  Laparoscopy in the era of enhanced recovery.

Authors:  T A Rockall; N Demartines
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.043

6.  Intraoperative ventilatory strategies for prevention of pulmonary atelectasis in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Hesham F Talab; Ibrahim Ali Zabani; Hassan Saad Abdelrahman; Waleed L Bukhari; Irfan Mamoun; Majed A Ashour; Bakr Bin Sadeq; Sameh Ibrahim El Sayed
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Effect of age on pulmonary gas exchange during laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg lithotomy position.

Authors:  O Takahata; T Kunisawa; M Nagashima; K Mamiya; K Sakurai; S Fujita; K Fujimoto; H Iwasaki
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 2.105

8.  Prevention of atelectasis in morbidly obese patients during general anesthesia and paralysis: a computerized tomography study.

Authors:  Henrik Reinius; Lennart Jonsson; Sven Gustafsson; Magnus Sundbom; Olov Duvernoy; Paolo Pelosi; Göran Hedenstierna; Filip Fredén
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 9.  Protective lung ventilation in operating room: a systematic review.

Authors:  E Futier; J M Constantin; S Jaber
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Effects of pneumoperitoneum on intraoperative pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange during laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  N T Nguyen; J T Anderson; M Budd; N W Fleming; H S Ho; J Jahr; C M Stevens; B M Wolfe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  17 in total

1.  Pneumoperitoneum deteriorates intratidal respiratory system mechanics: an observational study in lung-healthy patients.

Authors:  Steffen Wirth; Andreas Biesemann; Johannes Spaeth; Stefan Schumann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of the effects of deep and moderate neuromuscular block on respiratory system compliance and surgical space conditions during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Shao-Jun Zhu; Xiao-Lin Zhang; Qing Xie; Yan-Feng Zhou; Kui-Rong Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2020 Aug.       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Laparoscopic versus open resection for elderly patients with gastric cancer: a double-center study with propensity score matching method.

Authors:  Wei-Zhe Chen; Qian-Tong Dong; Feng-Min Zhang; Hui-Yang Cai; Jing-Yi Yan; Cheng-Le Zhuang; Zhen Yu; Xiao-Lei Chen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Low Tidal Volume Positive End-Expiratory Pressure versus High Tidal Volume Zero-Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Postoperative Pulmonary Functions in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Murat Haliloglu; Beliz Bilgili; Mehtap Ozdemir; Tumay Umuroglu; Nurten Bakan
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 5.  Perianesthetic Management of Laparoscopic Kidney Surgery.

Authors:  Georges Nasrallah; Fouad G Souki
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Perioperative lung protective ventilation.

Authors:  Brian O'Gara; Daniel Talmor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-09-10

7.  Exploring the intraoperative lung protective ventilation of different positive end-expiratory pressure levels during abdominal laparoscopic surgery with Trendelenburg position.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Hong Wang; Huijuan Wang; Xiao Zhao; Shitong Li; Lianhua Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-04

Review 8.  Intraoperative use of low volume ventilation to decrease postoperative mortality, mechanical ventilation, lengths of stay and lung injury in adults without acute lung injury.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Edward A Ochroch; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-09

9.  Perioperative "remote" acute lung injury: recent update.

Authors:  Zhaosheng Jin; Ka Chun Suen; Daqing Ma
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2017-01-19

10.  Application of intraoperative lung-protective ventilation varies in accordance with the knowledge of anaesthesiologists: a single-Centre questionnaire study and a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Seung Hyun Kim; Sungwon Na; Woo Kyung Lee; Hyunwoo Choi; Jeongmin Kim
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.