Literature DB >> 26895905

Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy: early results after 115 consecutive patients.

Santiago Sánchez-Cabús1,2, Jean-Philippe Adam3, Gabriella Pittau4, Maximiliano Gelli4, Antonio Sa Cunha4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite its proven feasibility and good results, the use of laparoscopy in left-sided pancreatic lesions is considered a challenging procedure, and therefore, its utilization is still low. In this paper, we aim to describe the early outcomes obtained after laparoscopic left pancreatectomies performed over 15 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1997 until 2014, 115 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic left pancreatectomy at CHU Bordeaux and Centre Hépato-Biliaire, which were prospectively recorded in a database. An analysis of this database was performed in order to evaluate preoperative, intraoperative and immediate postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy with spleen conservation was performed in 64 patients (55.7 %). The median operative time was 220 min, and median blood loss was 200 ml. Conversion to open surgery was made in 15 (13 %) patients. Median postoperative hospital stay was 11 days, and overall postoperative complications occurred in 59 patients (51.3 %). Of these, 25.4 % were Clavien-Dindo grade III and above. The rate of clinical PF was 11.3 %. Three of the 64 patients with splenic preservation (4.7 %) developed a splenic infarction, and one of them needed splenectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Results obtained after a long series of laparoscopic left pancreatectomy confirm its favorable outcomes and its association with a low postoperative morbidity rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal pancreatectomy; Laparoscopic pancreatectomy; Laparoscopy; Pancreas; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26895905     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4780-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  53 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study.

Authors:  Mohammad Abu Hilal; Mohammed Hamdan; Francesco Di Fabio; Neil W Pearce; Colin D Johnson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cheng-Jun Sui; Bin Li; Jia-Mei Yang; Shuang-Jia Wang; Yan-Ming Zhou
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.767

3.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation.

Authors:  A Sa Cunha; B Masson
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.043

4.  Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies.

Authors:  Giuseppe R Nigri; Alan S Rosman; Niccolò Petrucciani; Alessandro Fancellu; Michele Pisano; Luigi Zorcolo; Giovanni Ramacciato; Marcovalerio Melis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing three techniques for pancreatic remnant closure following distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  H Zhang; F Zhu; M Shen; R Tian; C J Shi; X Wang; J X Jiang; J Hu; M Wang; R Y Qin
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Ki Byung Song; Song Cheol Kim; Jae Berm Park; Young Hoon Kim; Young Soo Jung; Myung-Hwan Kim; Sung-Koo Lee; Dong-Wan Seo; Sang Soo Lee; Do Hyun Park; Duck Jong Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  S Trastulli; R Cirocchi; C Listorti; D Cavaliere; N Avenia; N Gullà; G Giustozzi; F Sciannameo; G Noya; C Boselli
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  High surgical morbidity following distal pancreatectomy: still an unsolved problem.

Authors:  Matthias Reeh; Michael F Nentwich; Dean Bogoevski; Alexandra M Koenig; Florian Gebauer; Michael Tachezy; Jakob R Izbicki; Maximilian Bockhorn
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Laparoscopic versus open left pancreatectomy: can preoperative factors indicate the safer technique?

Authors:  Clifford S Cho; David A Kooby; C Max Schmidt; Attila Nakeeb; David J Bentrem; Nipun B Merchant; Alexander A Parikh; Ronald C G Martin; Charles R Scoggins; Syed A Ahmad; Hong J Kim; Nicholas Hamilton; William G Hawkins; Sharon M Weber
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in Italy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudio Ricci; Riccardo Casadei; Enrico Lazzarini; Marielda D'Ambra; Salvatore Buscemi; Carlo Alberto Pacilio; Giovanni Taffurelli; Francesco Minni
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2014-10
View more
  7 in total

1.  Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in elderly and octogenarian patients: a single-center, comparative study.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Yi-Ping Mou; Jia-Fei Yan; Ren-Chao Zhang; Miao-Zun Zhang; Jia-Yu Zhou; Xian-Fa Wang; Hendi Maher; Qi-Long Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robotic single-site plus ONE port distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Sung Hyun Kim; Chang Moo Kang; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A blunt dissection technique using the LigaSure vessel-sealing device improves perioperative outcomes and postoperative splenic-vessel patency after laparoscopic spleen- and splenic-vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Sungho Kim; Yoo-Seok Yoon; Ho-Seong Han; Jai Young Cho; YoungRok Choi; In Gun Hyun; Kil Hwan Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Simultaneous laparoscopic resection of distal pancreas and liver nodule for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

Authors:  Nicola Passuello; Michele Valmasoni; Gioia Pozza; Elisa Sefora Pierobon; Alberto Ponzoni; Cosimo Sperti
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-12-06

5.  Impact of laparoscopy in patients aged over 70 years requiring distal pancreatectomy: a French multicentric comparative study.

Authors:  Regis Souche; David Fuks; Julie Perinel; Astrid Herrero; Françoise Guillon; Isabelle Pirlet; Thierry Perniceni; Frederic Borie; Antonio Sa Cunha; Brice Gayet; Jean-Michel Fabre
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Yuanchi Weng; Jiabin Jin; Zhen Huo; Yusheng Shi; Yu Jiang; Xiaxing Deng; Chenghong Peng; Baiyong Shen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Evolution of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies at a single institution.

Authors:  Brian K P Goh; Ser-Yee Lee; Juinn-Huar Kam; Hui Ling Soh; Peng-Chung Cheow; Pierce K H Chow; London L P J Ooi; Alexander Y F Chung; Chung-Yip Chan
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.