Literature DB >> 26895194

Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Lumbar Nerve Roots: Comparison Between Fast Readout-Segmented and Selective-Excitation Acquisitions.

Andrei Manoliu1, Michael Ho, Daniel Nanz, Marco Piccirelli, Evelyn Dappa, Markus Klarhöfer, Filippo Del Grande, Felix Pierre Kuhn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the quality of recently emerged advanced diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) techniques with conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) in a functional assessment of lumbar nerve roots.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved the study including 12 healthy volunteers. Diffusion tensor imaging was performed at 3 T (MAGNETOM Skyra; Siemens Healthcare) with b-values of 0 and 700 s/mm and an isotropic spatial resolution for subsequent multiplanar reformatting. The nerve roots L2 to S1 were imaged in coronal orientation with readout-segmented EPI (rs-DTI) and selective-excitation EPI (sTX-DTI) with an acquisition time of 5 minutes each, and in axial orientation with single-shot EPI (ss-DTI) with an acquisition time of 12 minutes (scan parameters as in recent literature). Two independent readers qualitatively and quantitatively assessed image quality.
RESULTS: The interobserver reliability ranged from "substantial" to "almost perfect" for all examined parameter and all 3 sequences (κ = 0.70-0.94). Overall image quality was rated higher, and artifact levels were scored lower for rs-DTI and sTX-DTI than for ss-DTI (P = 0.007-0.027), while fractional anisotropy and signal-to-noise ratio values were similar for all sequences (P ≥ 0.306 and P ≥ 0.100, respectively). Contrast-to-noise ratios were significantly higher for rs-DTI and ss-DTI than for sTX-DTI (P = 0.004-0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite shorter acquisition times, rs-DTI and sTX-DTI produced images of higher quality with smaller geometrical distortions than the current standard of reference, ss-DTI. Thus, DTI acquisitions in the coronal plane, requiring fewer slices for full coverage of exiting nerve roots, may allow for functional neurography in scan times suitable for routine clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26895194     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  9 in total

1.  MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparison between acquisitions at 7.0 T using dielectric pads and 3.0 T.

Authors:  Felix P Kuhn; Georg Spinner; Filippo Del Grande; Michael Wyss; Marco Piccirelli; Stefan Erni; Pascal Pfister; Michael Ho; Bert-Ram Sah; Lukas Filli; Dominik A Ettlin; Luigi M Gallo; Gustav Andreisek; Andrei Manoliu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Evaluation of collimated polarized light imaging for real-time intraoperative selective nerve identification in the human hand.

Authors:  K W T K Chin; A F Engelsman; P T K Chin; S L Meijer; S D Strackee; R J Oostra; T M van Gulik
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Peripheral nerve diffusion tensor imaging (DTI): normal values and demographic determinants in a cohort of 60 healthy individuals.

Authors:  Moritz Kronlage; Véronique Schwehr; Daniel Schwarz; Tim Godel; Lorenz Uhlmann; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Philipp Bäumer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Diffusion-weighted MR is useful to assess peripheral nerve invasion of soft tissue tumor.

Authors:  Gang Wu; Liangjin Liu; Zou Mei; Xiaoming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Microstructural changes are coincident with the improvement of clinical symptoms in surgically treated compressed nerve roots.

Authors:  Weifei Wu; Jie Liang; Ying Chen; Aihua Chen; Yongde Wu; Zong Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Recent advances in magnetic resonance neuroimaging of lumbar nerve to clinical applications: A review of clinical studies utilizing Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance neurography.

Authors:  Yawara Eguchi; Hirohito Kanamoto; Yasuhiro Oikawa; Munetaka Suzuki; Hajime Yamanaka; Hiroshi Tamai; Tatsuya Kobayashi; Sumihisa Orita; Kazuyo Yamauchi; Miyako Suzuki; Kazuhide Inage; Yasuchika Aoki; Atsuya Watanabe; Takeo Furuya; Masao Koda; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-12-20

7.  Feasibility of Diffusion Tensor and Morphologic Imaging of Peripheral Nerves at Ultra-High Field Strength.

Authors:  Annina B Schmid; Jon Campbell; Samuel A Hurley; Saad Jbabdi; Jesper L Andersson; Mark Jenkinson; Neal K Bangerter; David L Bennett; Irene Tracey; Robert Frost; Stuart Clare
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Isotropic resolution diffusion tensor imaging of lumbosacral and sciatic nerves using a phase-corrected diffusion-prepared 3D turbo spin echo.

Authors:  Barbara Cervantes; Anh T Van; Dominik Weidlich; Hendrick Kooijman; Andreas Hock; Ernst J Rummeny; Alexandra Gersing; Jan S Kirschke; Dimitrios C Karampinos
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Comparison of simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented EPI and conventional single-shot EPI for diffusion tensor imaging of the ulnar nerve.

Authors:  Michael Ho; Anton Becker; Erika Ulbrich; Andrei Manoliu; Félix P Kuhn; Matthias Eberhard; Lukas Filli
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-10-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.