Literature DB >> 26895173

Uncertainty in the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Production of Three Biobased Polymer Families.

I Daniel Posen1, Paulina Jaramillo1, W Michael Griffin1.   

Abstract

Interest in biobased products has been motivated, in part, by the claim that these products have lower life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions than their fossil counterparts. This study investigates GHG emissions from U.S. production of three important biobased polymer families: polylactic acid (PLA), polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and bioethylene-based plastics. The model incorporates uncertainty into the life cycle emission estimates using Monte Carlo simulation. Results present a range of scenarios for feedstock choice (corn or switchgrass), treatment of coproducts, data sources, end of life assumptions, and displaced fossil polymer. Switchgrass pathways generally have lower emissions than corn pathways, and can even generate negative cradle-to-gate emissions if unfermented residues are used to coproduce energy. PHB (from either feedstock) is unlikely to have lower emissions than fossil polymers once end of life emissions are included. PLA generally has the lowest emissions when compared to high emission fossil polymers, such as polystyrene (mean GHG savings up to 1.4 kg CO2e/kg corn PLA and 2.9 kg CO2e/kg switchgrass PLA). In contrast, bioethylene is likely to achieve the greater emission reduction for ethylene intensive polymers, like polyethylene (mean GHG savings up to 0.60 kg CO2e/kg corn polyethylene and 3.4 kg CO2e/kg switchgrass polyethylene).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26895173     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  8 in total

Review 1.  Repurposing anaerobic digestate for economical biomanufacturing and water recovery.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar; Roy Posmanik; Sabrina Spatari; Victor C Ujor
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  The limitations of bioeconomy LCA studies for understanding the transition to sustainable bioeconomy.

Authors:  Nishtha Talwar; Nicholas M Holden
Journal:  Int J Life Cycle Assess       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 5.257

3.  Core Concept: Bioplastics offer carbon-cutting advantages but are no panacea.

Authors:  M Mitchell Waldrop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 4.  The role of biotechnology in the transition from plastics to bioplastics: an opportunity to reconnect global growth with sustainability.

Authors:  Micaela Degli Esposti; Davide Morselli; Fabio Fava; Lorenzo Bertin; Fabrizio Cavani; Davide Viaggi; Paola Fabbri
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.693

Review 5.  A comprehensive review on antimicrobial face masks: an emerging weapon in fighting pandemics.

Authors:  Gayathri Pullangott; Uthradevi Kannan; Gayathri S; Degala Venkata Kiran; Shihabudheen M Maliyekkal
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 6.  Lignin as a Renewable Building Block for Sustainable Polyurethanes.

Authors:  Fernanda Rosa Vieira; Sandra Magina; Dmitry V Evtuguin; Ana Barros-Timmons
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 7.  Biodegradable Plastics: Standards, Policies, and Impacts.

Authors:  Layla Filiciotto; Gadi Rothenberg
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 8.928

8.  Polyamide monomers via carbonate-promoted C-H carboxylation of furfurylamine.

Authors:  Andrew W Lankenau; Matthew W Kanan
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 9.825

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.