Literature DB >> 26894457

Stereotactic probability and variability of speech arrest and anomia sites during stimulation mapping of the language dominant hemisphere.

Edward F Chang1,2,3,4, Jonathan D Breshears1, Kunal P Raygor1, Darryl Lau1, Annette M Molinaro1,5, Mitchel S Berger1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Functional mapping using direct cortical stimulation is the gold standard for the prevention of postoperative morbidity during resective surgery in dominant-hemisphere perisylvian regions. Its role is necessitated by the significant interindividual variability that has been observed for essential language sites. The aim in this study was to determine the statistical probability distribution of eliciting aphasic errors for any given stereotactically based cortical position in a patient cohort and to quantify the variability at each cortical site. METHODS Patients undergoing awake craniotomy for dominant-hemisphere primary brain tumor resection between 1999 and 2014 at the authors' institution were included in this study, which included counting and picture-naming tasks during dense speech mapping via cortical stimulation. Positive and negative stimulation sites were collected using an intraoperative frameless stereotactic neuronavigation system and were converted to Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates. Data were iteratively resampled to create mean and standard deviation probability maps for speech arrest and anomia. Patients were divided into groups with a "classic" or an "atypical" location of speech function, based on the resultant probability maps. Patient and clinical factors were then assessed for their association with an atypical location of speech sites by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Across 102 patients undergoing speech mapping, the overall probabilities of speech arrest and anomia were 0.51 and 0.33, respectively. Speech arrest was most likely to occur with stimulation of the posterior inferior frontal gyrus (maximum probability from individual bin = 0.025), and variance was highest in the dorsal premotor cortex and the posterior superior temporal gyrus. In contrast, stimulation within the posterior perisylvian cortex resulted in the maximum mean probability of anomia (maximum probability = 0.012), with large variance in the regions surrounding the posterior superior temporal gyrus, including the posterior middle temporal, angular, and supramarginal gyri. Patients with atypical speech localization were far more likely to have tumors in canonical Broca's or Wernicke's areas (OR 7.21, 95% CI 1.67-31.09, p < 0.01) or to have multilobar tumors (OR 12.58, 95% CI 2.22-71.42, p < 0.01), than were patients with classic speech localization. CONCLUSIONS This study provides statistical probability distribution maps for aphasic errors during cortical stimulation mapping in a patient cohort. Thus, the authors provide an expected probability of inducing speech arrest and anomia from specific 10-mm2 cortical bins in an individual patient. In addition, they highlight key regions of interindividual mapping variability that should be considered preoperatively. They believe these results will aid surgeons in their preoperative planning of eloquent cortex resection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MNI = Montreal Neurological Institute; anomia; cortical stimulation; functional neurosurgery; language mapping; pSTG = posterior superior temporal gyrus; probability maps; speech arrest; vPMC = ventral premotor cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26894457     DOI: 10.3171/2015.10.JNS151087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  19 in total

1.  The Control of Vocal Pitch in Human Laryngeal Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Benjamin K Dichter; Jonathan D Breshears; Matthew K Leonard; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  A contemporary framework of language processing in the human brain in the context of preoperative and intraoperative language mapping.

Authors:  Erik H Middlebrooks; Kaan Yagmurlu; Jerzey P Szaflarski; Maryam Rahman; Baran Bozkurt
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Paradoxical vocal changes in a trained singer by focally cooling the right superior temporal gyrus.

Authors:  Kalman A Katlowitz; Hiroyuki Oya; Matthew A Howard; Jeremy D W Greenlee; Michael A Long
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Critical Language Areas Show Increased Functional Connectivity in Human Cortex.

Authors:  John D Rolston; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Broca's area and the search for anatomical asymmetry: commentary and perspectives.

Authors:  Trisanna Sprung-Much; Nicole Eichert; Erika Nolan; Michael Petrides
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.270

Review 6.  Functional Approaches to the Surgery of Brain Gliomas.

Authors:  Davide Giampiccolo; Sonia Nunes; Luigi Cattaneo; Francesco Sala
Journal:  Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg       Date:  2022

Review 7.  Supratotal Resection of Gliomas With Awake Brain Mapping: Maximal Tumor Resection Preserving Motor, Language, and Neurocognitive Functions.

Authors:  Kazuya Motomura; Fumiharu Ohka; Kosuke Aoki; Ryuta Saito
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 8.  Surgical oncology for gliomas: the state of the art.

Authors:  Nader Sanai; Mitchel S Berger
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  Neurosurgical Patients as Human Research Subjects: Ethical Considerations in Intracranial Electrophysiology Research.

Authors:  Winston Chiong; Matthew K Leonard; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Speech-Driven Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields Beyond the Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan H Venezia; Virginia M Richards; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.