Mustafa Ulubay1, Mustafa Öztürk2, Fahri Burçin Firatligil2, Ulas Fidan1, Ugur Keskin1, Murat Dede3, Müfit Cemal Yenen4. 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy , Etlik, Ankara, Turkey . 2. Specialist, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy , Etlik, Ankara, Turkey . 3. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy , Etlik, Ankara, Turkey . 4. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy , Etlik, Ankara, Turkey .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In gynaecologic practice, LigaSure Precise(TM) is generally used in endoscopic and open surgeries, such as hysterectomy, adnexectomy, and cancer surgery. However, there is no case report or main research article where LigaSure Precise(TM) has been used for myomectomy. We want to compare a technique using a vessel sealing instrument with a conventional technique in abdominal myomectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five women who underwent abdominal myomectomy were divided two groups: (1) a vessel sealing instrument-assisted technique (24 patients); and (2) a conventional technique (31 patients) between January 2011 and December 2014 at the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey. The data for the operation times, the occurrence of perioperative complications, the hospitalization times, and changes in haemaglobin and haematocrit levels for the two techniques were collected and compared. RESULTS: The mean operation time was 48 minutes for the vessel sealing instrument-assisted technique and 54 minutes for the conventional technique. No statistically significant differences were determined for haemoglobin and haematocrit changes, hospital stay and perioperative complications. CONCLUSION: We did not find any difference in the occurrence of complications, changes in haemoglobin or haematocrit levels, or hospital stay. The vessel sealing instrument-assisted technique is feasible and effective in reducing operation times.
INTRODUCTION: In gynaecologic practice, LigaSure Precise(TM) is generally used in endoscopic and open surgeries, such as hysterectomy, adnexectomy, and cancer surgery. However, there is no case report or main research article where LigaSure Precise(TM) has been used for myomectomy. We want to compare a technique using a vessel sealing instrument with a conventional technique in abdominal myomectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five women who underwent abdominal myomectomy were divided two groups: (1) a vessel sealing instrument-assisted technique (24 patients); and (2) a conventional technique (31 patients) between January 2011 and December 2014 at the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey. The data for the operation times, the occurrence of perioperative complications, the hospitalization times, and changes in haemaglobin and haematocrit levels for the two techniques were collected and compared. RESULTS: The mean operation time was 48 minutes for the vessel sealing instrument-assisted technique and 54 minutes for the conventional technique. No statistically significant differences were determined for haemoglobin and haematocrit changes, hospital stay and perioperative complications. CONCLUSION: We did not find any difference in the occurrence of complications, changes in haemoglobin or haematocrit levels, or hospital stay. The vessel sealing instrument-assisted technique is feasible and effective in reducing operation times.
Entities:
Keywords:
Blood loss; Conventional myomectomy; Operation time