| Literature DB >> 26893306 |
Deborah Ummel1, Marie Achille2.
Abstract
Confidentiality is one of the cornerstones of research involving human participants. Researchers are the frontline gatekeepers of their participants' right to confidentiality, and situations can arise that challenge this responsibility. This is the case when individuals who have shared a common experience (i.e., dyads) are interviewed separately, but interview results are disseminated within the context of dyads. Based on our experience of conducting research with dyads and given how little literature is available to serve as guide, we set out to write this article to share the knowledge we acquired and the solutions we found. We will describe both the ethical challenges and the methodological decisions involved in conducting qualitative research with dyads. The article also describes different modalities of dyadic analysis, their benefits and drawbacks. This endeavor seems especially relevant as research with dyads is emerging in several domains involving couples, families, caregivers and health.Entities:
Keywords: confidentiality/privacy; data collection and management; disclosure; ethics/moral perspectives; interviews; qualitative; qualitative analysis; relationships; research; research design
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26893306 DOI: 10.1177/1049732315627427
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Qual Health Res ISSN: 1049-7323