Literature DB >> 26893215

A multiple imputation approach for MNAR mechanisms compatible with Heckman's model.

Jacques-Emmanuel Galimard1,2, Sylvie Chevret1,2,3, Camelia Protopopescu4, Matthieu Resche-Rigon1,2,3.   

Abstract

Standard implementations of multiple imputation (MI) approaches provide unbiased inferences based on an assumption of underlying missing at random (MAR) mechanisms. However, in the presence of missing data generated by missing not at random (MNAR) mechanisms, MI is not satisfactory. Originating in an econometric statistical context, Heckman's model, also called the sample selection method, deals with selected samples using two joined linear equations, termed the selection equation and the outcome equation. It has been successfully applied to MNAR outcomes. Nevertheless, such a method only addresses missing outcomes, and this is a strong limitation in clinical epidemiology settings, where covariates are also often missing. We propose to extend the validity of MI to some MNAR mechanisms through the use of the Heckman's model as imputation model and a two-step estimation process. This approach will provide a solution that can be used in an MI by chained equation framework to impute missing (either outcomes or covariates) data resulting either from a MAR or an MNAR mechanism when the MNAR mechanism is compatible with a Heckman's model. The approach is illustrated on a real dataset from a randomised trial in patients with seasonal influenza.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heckman's model; missing data; missing not at random (MNAR); multiple imputation: chained equation; sample selection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26893215     DOI: 10.1002/sim.6902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  8 in total

Review 1.  An Educational Review About Using Cost Data for the Purpose of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Franklin; James Lomas; Simon Walker; Tracey Young
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors.

Authors:  Jacques-Emmanuel Galimard; Sylvie Chevret; Emmanuel Curis; Matthieu Resche-Rigon
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Preventing bias from selective non-response in population-based survey studies: findings from a Monte Carlo simulation study.

Authors:  Kristin Gustavson; Espen Røysamb; Ingrid Borren
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture versus standard care for pelvic and low back pain in pregnancy: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephanie Nicolian; Thibault Butel; Laetitia Gambotti; Manon Durand; Antoine Filipovic-Pierucci; Alain Mallet; Mamadou Kone; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski; Marc Dommergues
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Accounting for missing data in statistical analyses: multiple imputation is not always the answer.

Authors:  Rachael A Hughes; Jon Heron; Jonathan A C Sterne; Kate Tilling
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Evaluation of Multiple Imputation with Large Proportions of Missing Data: How Much Is Too Much?

Authors:  Jin Hyuk Lee; J Charles Huber
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.429

7.  Modeling competence development in the presence of selection bias.

Authors:  Sabine Zinn; Timo Gnambs
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-12

8.  On the Treatment of Missing Item Responses in Educational Large-Scale Assessment Data: An Illustrative Simulation Study and a Case Study Using PISA 2018 Mathematics Data.

Authors:  Alexander Robitzsch
Journal:  Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ       Date:  2021-12-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.