Lanikea B King1, Hasse Walum1, Kiyoshi Inoue1, Nicholas W Eyrich1, Larry J Young2. 1. Silvio O. Conte Center for Oxytocin and Social Cognition, Center for Translational Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Silvio O. Conte Center for Oxytocin and Social Cognition, Center for Translational Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: lyoun03@emory.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oxytocin (OXT) modulates several aspects of social behavior. Intranasal OXT is a leading candidate for treating social deficits in patients with autism spectrum disorder, and common genetic variants in the human OXTR gene are associated with emotion recognition, relationship quality, and autism spectrum disorder. Animal models have revealed that individual differences in Oxtr expression in the brain drive social behavior variation. Our understanding of how genetic variation contributes to brain OXTR expression is very limited. METHODS: We investigated Oxtr expression in monogamous prairie voles, which have a well-characterized OXT system. We quantified brain region-specific levels of Oxtr messenger RNA and oxytocin receptor protein with established neuroanatomic methods. We used pyrosequencing to investigate allelic imbalance of Oxtr mRNA, a molecular signature of polymorphic genetic regulatory elements. We performed next-generation sequencing to discover variants in and near the Oxtr gene. We investigated social attachment using the partner preference test. RESULTS: Our allelic imbalance data demonstrate that genetic variants contribute to individual differences in Oxtr expression, but only in particular brain regions, including the nucleus accumbens, where oxytocin receptor signaling facilitates social attachment. Next-generation sequencing identified one polymorphism in the Oxtr intron, near a putative cis-regulatory element, explaining 74% of the variance in striatal Oxtr expression specifically. Males homozygous for the high expressing allele display enhanced social attachment. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these findings provide convincing evidence for robust genetic influence on Oxtr expression and provide novel insights into how noncoding polymorphisms in OXTR might influence individual differences in human social cognition and behavior.
BACKGROUND:Oxytocin (OXT) modulates several aspects of social behavior. Intranasal OXT is a leading candidate for treating social deficits in patients with autism spectrum disorder, and common genetic variants in the humanOXTR gene are associated with emotion recognition, relationship quality, and autism spectrum disorder. Animal models have revealed that individual differences in Oxtr expression in the brain drive social behavior variation. Our understanding of how genetic variation contributes to brain OXTR expression is very limited. METHODS: We investigated Oxtr expression in monogamous prairie voles, which have a well-characterized OXT system. We quantified brain region-specific levels of Oxtr messenger RNA and oxytocin receptor protein with established neuroanatomic methods. We used pyrosequencing to investigate allelic imbalance of Oxtr mRNA, a molecular signature of polymorphic genetic regulatory elements. We performed next-generation sequencing to discover variants in and near the Oxtr gene. We investigated social attachment using the partner preference test. RESULTS: Our allelic imbalance data demonstrate that genetic variants contribute to individual differences in Oxtr expression, but only in particular brain regions, including the nucleus accumbens, where oxytocin receptor signaling facilitates social attachment. Next-generation sequencing identified one polymorphism in the Oxtr intron, near a putative cis-regulatory element, explaining 74% of the variance in striatal Oxtr expression specifically. Males homozygous for the high expressing allele display enhanced social attachment. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these findings provide convincing evidence for robust genetic influence on Oxtr expression and provide novel insights into how noncoding polymorphisms in OXTR might influence individual differences in humansocial cognition and behavior.
Authors: Chris J Cretekos; Ying Wang; Eric D Green; James F Martin; John J Rasweiler; Richard R Behringer Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Olga Peñagarikano; María T Lázaro; Xiao-Hong Lu; Aaron Gordon; Hongmei Dong; Hoa A Lam; Elior Peles; Nigel T Maidment; Niall P Murphy; X William Yang; Peyman Golshani; Daniel H Geschwind Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-01-21 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Kun Zhang; Jin Billy Li; Yuan Gao; Dieter Egli; Bin Xie; Jie Deng; Zhe Li; Je-Hyuk Lee; John Aach; Emily M Leproust; Kevin Eggan; George M Church Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Lauren M Sippel; Shizhong Han; Laura E Watkins; Ilan Harpaz-Rotem; Steven M Southwick; John H Krystal; Miranda Olff; Richard Sherva; Lindsay A Farrer; Henry R Kranzler; Joel Gelernter; Robert H Pietrzak Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2017-07-08 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Christina N Rogers; Amy P Ross; Shweta P Sahu; Ethan R Siegel; Jeromy M Dooyema; Mary Ann Cree; Edward G Stopa; Larry J Young; James K Rilling; H Elliott Albers; Todd M Preuss Journal: Am J Primatol Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 2.371
Authors: S E Kakarala; K E Roberts; M Rogers; T Coats; F Falzarano; J Gang; M Chilov; J Avery; P K Maciejewski; W G Lichtenthal; H G Prigerson Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Marilena M DeMayo; Larry J Young; Ian B Hickie; Yun Ju C Song; Adam J Guastella Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 8.989