Literature DB >> 26892863

Rare emergence of drug resistance in HIV-1 treatment-naïve patients after 48 weeks of treatment with elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide.

Nicolas A Margot1, Kathryn M Kitrinos1, Marshall Fordyce1, Scott McCallister1, Michael D Miller1, Christian Callebaut1.   

Abstract

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a novel prodrug of the NtRTI tenofovir (TFV), delivers TFV-diphosphate (TFV-DP) to target cells more efficiently than the current prodrug, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), with a 90% reduction in TFV plasma exposure. TAF, within the fixed dose combination of elvitegravir /cobicistat / emtricitabine (FTC)/TAF (E/C/F/TAF), has been evaluated in one Phase 2 and two Phase 3 randomized, double-blinded studies in HIV-infected treatment-naive patients, comparing E/C/F/TAF to E/C/F/TDF. In these studies, the TAF-containing group demonstrated non-inferior efficacy to the TDF-containing comparator group with 91.9% of E/C/F/TAF patients having <50 copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA at week 48. An integrated resistance analysis across these three studies was conducted, including HIV-1 genotypic analysis at screening, and genotypic/phenotypic analysis for patients with HIV-1 RNA>400 copies/mL at virologic failure. Pre-existing primary resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were observed at screening among the 1903 randomized and treated patients: 7.5% had NRTI-RAMs, 18.2% had NNRTI-RAMs, and 3.4% had primary PI-RAMs. Pre-treatment RAMs did not influence treatment response at Week 48. In the E/C/F/TAF group, resistance development was rare; seven patients (0.7%, 7/978) developed NRTI-RAMs, five of whom (0.5%, 5/978) also developed primary INSTI-RAMs. In the E/C/F/TDF group, resistance development was also rare; seven patients (0.8%, 7/925) developed NRTI-RAMs, four of whom (0.4%, 4/925) also developed primary INSTI-RAMs. An additional analysis by deep sequencing in virologic failures revealed minimal differences compared to population sequencing. Overall, resistance development was rare in E/C/F/TAF-treated patients, and the pattern of emergent mutations was similar to E/C/F/TDF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  INSTI-R; M184V; Tenofovir; Tenofovir alafenamide; Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26892863     DOI: 10.1080/15284336.2016.1142731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HIV Clin Trials        ISSN: 1528-4336


  4 in total

1.  HIV-1 Subtype C, Tenofovir, and the Relationship With Treatment Failure and Drug Resistance.

Authors:  Huldrych F Günthard; Alexandra U Scherrer
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Lack of impact of pre-existing T97A HIV-1 integrase mutation on integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance and treatment outcome.

Authors:  Michael E Abram; Renee R Ram; Nicolas A Margot; Tiffany L Barnes; Kirsten L White; Christian Callebaut; Michael D Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  HIV-1 Virologic Rebound Due to Coadministration of Divalent Cations and Bictegravir.

Authors:  Alex E Rock; Patricia L DeMarais; Pamala T Vergara-Rodriguez; Blake E Max
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2020-07-04

4.  Surveillance of HIV-1 transmitted integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance in the UK.

Authors:  Jean L Mbisa; Juan Ledesma; Peter Kirwan; David F Bibby; Carmen Manso; Andrew Skingsley; Gary Murphy; Alison Brown; David T Dunn; Valerie Delpech; Anna Maria Geretti
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 5.790

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.