Literature DB >> 26892747

A novel holistic framework for genetic-based captive-breeding and reintroduction programs.

C R M Attard1, L M Möller1, M Sasaki1, M P Hammer2, C M Bice3, C J Brauer1, D C Carvalho1,4, J O Harris1, L B Beheregaray5.   

Abstract

Research in reintroduction biology has provided a greater understanding of the often limited success of species reintroductions and highlighted the need for scientifically rigorous approaches in reintroduction programs. We examined the recent genetic-based captive-breeding and reintroduction literature to showcase the underuse of the genetic data gathered. We devised a framework that takes full advantage of the genetic data through assessment of the genetic makeup of populations before (past component of the framework), during (present component), and after (future component) captive-breeding and reintroduction events to understand their conservation potential and maximize their success. We empirically applied our framework to two small fishes: Yarra pygmy perch (Nannoperca obscura) and southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis). Each of these species has a locally adapted and geographically isolated lineage that is endemic to the highly threatened lower Murray-Darling Basin in Australia. These two populations were rescued during Australia's recent decade-long Millennium Drought, when their persistence became entirely dependent on captive-breeding and subsequent reintroduction efforts. Using historical demographic analyses, we found differences and similarities between the species in the genetic impacts of past natural and anthropogenic events that occurred in situ, such as European settlement (past component). Subsequently, successful maintenance of genetic diversity in captivity-despite skewed brooder contribution to offspring-was achieved through carefully managed genetic-based breeding (present component). Finally, genetic monitoring revealed the survival and recruitment of released captive-bred offspring in the wild (future component). Our holistic framework often requires no additional data collection to that typically gathered in genetic-based breeding programs, is applicable to a wide range of species, advances the genetic considerations of reintroduction programs, and is expected to improve with the use of next-generation sequencing technology.
© 2016 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conservación genética; conservation genetics; diversidad genética; extinción; extinction; fish; genetic diversity; genética genômica de restauración; management; manejo; peces; restoration genomics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26892747     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  12 in total

1.  Genetic evaluation of the Iberian lynx ex situ conservation programme.

Authors:  Daniel Kleinman-Ruiz; Laura Soriano; Mireia Casas-Marce; Charles Szychta; Iñigo Sánchez; Jesús Fernández; José A Godoy
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Landscape genetics informs mesohabitat preference and conservation priorities for a surrogate indicator species in a highly fragmented river system.

Authors:  J Lean; M P Hammer; P J Unmack; M Adams; L B Beheregaray
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Genetic Diversity of an Imperiled Neotropical Catfish and Recommendations for Its Restoration.

Authors:  Fernando S Fonseca; Rodrigo R Domingues; Eric M Hallerman; Alexandre W S Hilsdorf
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Severe consequences of habitat fragmentation on genetic diversity of an endangered Australian freshwater fish: A call for assisted gene flow.

Authors:  Alexandra Pavlova; Luciano B Beheregaray; Rhys Coleman; Dean Gilligan; Katherine A Harrisson; Brett A Ingram; Joanne Kearns; Annika M Lamb; Mark Lintermans; Jarod Lyon; Thuy T T Nguyen; Minami Sasaki; Zeb Tonkin; Jian D L Yen; Paul Sunnucks
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  A broad genomic panel of microsatellite loci from Brycon orbignyanus (Characiformes: Bryconidae) an endangered migratory Neotropical fish.

Authors:  Gabriel M Yazbeck; Rafael Sachetto Oliveira; José Mauro Ribeiro; Raíssa D Graciano; Rosiane P Santos; Fausto M S Carmo; Dominique Lavenier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A comparison of pedigree, genetic and genomic estimates of relatedness for informing pairing decisions in two critically endangered birds: Implications for conservation breeding programmes worldwide.

Authors:  Stephanie J Galla; Roger Moraga; Liz Brown; Simone Cleland; Marc P Hoeppner; Richard F Maloney; Anne Richardson; Lyndon Slater; Anna W Santure; Tammy E Steeves
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Phylogenomic history of enigmatic pygmy perches: implications for biogeography, taxonomy and conservation.

Authors:  Sean J Buckley; Fabricius M C B Domingos; Catherine R M Attard; Chris J Brauer; Jonathan Sandoval-Castillo; Ryan Lodge; Peter J Unmack; Luciano B Beheregaray
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Population genetic structure of Texas horned lizards: implications for reintroduction and captive breeding.

Authors:  Dean A Williams; Nathan D Rains; Amanda M Hale
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 9.  Fifty Years of Research on European Mink Mustela lutreola L., 1761 Genetics: Where Are We Now in Studies on One of the Most Endangered Mammals?

Authors:  Jakub Skorupski
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Genassemblage 2.0 software facilitates conservation of genetic variation of captively propagated species.

Authors:  Dariusz Kaczmarczyk; Jacek Wolnicki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.