| Literature DB >> 26892437 |
Wen Liu1, Enyuan Hu2, Hong Jiang3, Yingjie Xiang4, Zhe Weng1, Min Li5, Qi Fan1, Xiqian Yu2, Eric I Altman5, Hailiang Wang1.
Abstract
Rational design and controlled synthesis of hybrid structuresEntities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26892437 PMCID: PMC4762894 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10771
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the sequential synthesis of the CoS|P/CNT hybrid material for HER catalysis.
The CoS|P/CNT is synthesized through three steps including hydrolysis, hydrothermal sulfurization and solid/gas-phase phosphorization.
Figure 2Structural characterizations of the CoS|P/CNT hybrid material.
(a) SEM image of CoS|P/CNT; Scale bar, 200 nm. (b) Low-magnification TEM image of CoS|P/CNT showing nanoparticles attached to CNTs; Scale bar, 20 nm. (c) XRD pattern of CoS|P/CNT as compared with the pyrite-phase CoS2 standard (PDF#41–1471). (d) High-resolution TEM image showing the (200) lattice fringes of pyrite-phase CoS|P; Scale bar, 5 nm.
Figure 3Composition and chemical analysis for the CoS|P/CNT hybrid material.
(a) STEM image recorded by a high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) detector showing CoS|P nanoparticles attached on CNTs. Scale bar, 20 nm. (b) STEM-EDS mapping of CoS|P/CNT catalyst showing the distributions of Co (green), P (yellow) and S (orange) within the nanoparticles closely attached to C (red). Scale bar, 20 nm. (c) EDS spectrum of CoS|P/CNT. (d) Raman spectra of CoS2/CNT and CoS|P/CNT. (e–g) Co 2p, S 2p and P 2p core level XPS spectra of CoS|P/CNT and CoS2/CNT.
Figure 4Electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution over the CoS|P/CNT catalyst.
(a) Polarization curves for HER on the CoS|P/CNT hybrid and a commercial Pt/C catalyst at 5 mV s−1. The catalyst mass loading was 0.4 mg cm−2 for Pt/C catalyst. (b) Tafel plots for the CoS|P/CNT and Pt/C catalysts derived from the polarization curves in a. (c) Chronoamperometric response (j∼t curve) recorded on the CoS|P/CNT electrode at a constant overpotential of 95 mV with iR compensation. (d) CV test between 0.25 and −0.12 V versus RHE at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1 for 2,000 cycles. The catalyst mass loading of CoS|P/CNT was 1.6 mg cm−2 unless otherwise noted.
Figure 5Comparison of chemical stability and catalytic durability between CoS2/CNT and CoS|P/CNT.
(a) Typical chronoamperometric responses (j∼t curves) of the CoS2/CNT and CoS|P/CNT catalysts driving hydrogen evolution at the overpotential of 77 mV without iR compensation for 20 h in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution. About 0.4 mg of each catalyst was loaded on a carbon fibre paper with 0.5 cm2 of active area. The sharp current fluctuations were caused by the sampling of electrolyte during the electrolysis process. (b) Box plots (median and quartiles) representing the concentrations of Co dissolved in 20 ml of electrolyte as the HER catalysis proceeds. The vertical whiskers represent the s.d. The statistics are derived from at least three independent measurements. (c) XRD patterns of CoS2/CNT and CoS|P/CNT after 2 weeks of storage in ambient conditions. (d) Colorimetric comparison of the CoS2/CNT and CoS|P/CNT hybrids soaked in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution for 2 h; Nitrite R salt was used as the colour indicator.
Figure 6XANES spectra of CoS|P/CNT and structural stability discussion based on first-principles calculations.
(a) Cobalt K-edge XANES spectra of CoS2/CNT and CoS|P/CNT compared with CoII (CoO) and CoIII (LiCoO2) standards. Pre-edge features correspond to transition from 1s (Co) orbital to eg* anti-bonding state, which is metal 3d and ligand 3p hybrid orbitals. The pre-edge features were fitted by two pseudo-Voigt functions with the results shown in the inset graph. (b) Sulfur K-edge XANES spectra of CoS2/CNT and CoS|P/CNT. (c) Structure illustration of pyrite-phase CoS2 and CoS|P (CoS2−P, x=1), each with a representative coordination polyhedron. (d) The energy difference per formula unit (f.u.) between the cubic and monoclinic phases as a function of the P substitution extent obtained from DFT calculations. The inset shows the equilibrium volume per f.u. in the cubic and monoclinic phases as a function of the P substitution extent. (e) Conceptual energy level diagrams of the frontier molecular orbitals for pyrite-phase CoS2 and CoS|P derived from the calculated electronic structures (Supplementary Fig. 12). CoS2 is magnetic at room temperature. As a result spin-up and spin-down electrons have different energy levels. CoS|P (CoS2−P, x=1) is non-magnetic.