Steven J Keteyian1, Mahesh Patel2, William E Kraus2, Clinton A Brawner3, Timothy R McConnell4, Ileana L Piña5, Eric S Leifer6, Jerome L Fleg6, Gordon Blackburn7, Gregg C Fonarow8, Paul J Chase9, Lucy Piner2, Marianne Vest10, Christopher M O'Connor2, Jonathan K Ehrman3, Mary N Walsh11, Gregory Ewald12, Dan Bensimhon9, Stuart D Russell13. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan. Electronic address: Sketeyi1@hfhs.org. 2. Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. 3. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan. 4. Department of Exercise Science, Bloomsburg University, Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania. 5. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York. 6. Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. 7. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 8. Ahmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, Ronald Regan-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. 9. Division of Cardiology, Cone Health, Greensboro, North Carolina. 10. University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio. 11. St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana. 12. Division of Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. 13. Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Data from a cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) test are used to determine prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). However, few published studies have simultaneously compared the relative prognostic strength of multiple CPX variables. OBJECTIVES: The study sought to describe the strength of the association among variables measured during a CPX test and all-cause mortality in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), including the influence of sex and patient effort, as measured by respiratory exchange ratio (RER). METHODS: Among patients (n = 2,100, 29% women) enrolled in the HF-ACTION (HF-A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of exercise traiNing) trial, 10 CPX test variables measured at baseline (e.g., peak oxygen uptake [Vo2], exercise duration, percent predicted peak Vo2 [%ppVo2], ventilatory efficiency) were examined. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 32 months, there were 357 deaths. All CPX variables, except RER, were related to all-cause mortality (all p < 0.0001). Both %ppVo2 and exercise duration were equally able to predict (Wald chi-square: ∼141) and discriminate (c-index: 0.69) mortality. Peak Vo2 (ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)) was the strongest predictor of mortality among men (Wald chi-square: 129) and exercise duration among women (Wald chi-square: 41). Multivariable analyses showed that %ppVo2, exercise duration, and peak Vo2 (ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)) were similarly able to predict and discriminate mortality. In men, a 10% 1-year mortality rate corresponded to a peak Vo2 of 10.9 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) versus 5.3 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) in women. CONCLUSIONS:Peak Vo2, exercise duration, and % ppVo2 carried the strongest ability to predict and discriminate the likelihood of death in patients with HFrEF. The prognosis associated with a given peak Vo2 differed by sex. (Exercise Training Program to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Individuals With Congestive Heart Failure; NCT00047437).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Data from a cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) test are used to determine prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). However, few published studies have simultaneously compared the relative prognostic strength of multiple CPX variables. OBJECTIVES: The study sought to describe the strength of the association among variables measured during a CPX test and all-cause mortality in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), including the influence of sex and patient effort, as measured by respiratory exchange ratio (RER). METHODS: Among patients (n = 2,100, 29% women) enrolled in the HF-ACTION (HF-A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of exercise traiNing) trial, 10 CPX test variables measured at baseline (e.g., peak oxygen uptake [Vo2], exercise duration, percent predicted peak Vo2 [%ppVo2], ventilatory efficiency) were examined. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 32 months, there were 357 deaths. All CPX variables, except RER, were related to all-cause mortality (all p < 0.0001). Both %ppVo2 and exercise duration were equally able to predict (Wald chi-square: ∼141) and discriminate (c-index: 0.69) mortality. Peak Vo2 (ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)) was the strongest predictor of mortality among men (Wald chi-square: 129) and exercise duration among women (Wald chi-square: 41). Multivariable analyses showed that %ppVo2, exercise duration, and peak Vo2 (ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)) were similarly able to predict and discriminate mortality. In men, a 10% 1-year mortality rate corresponded to a peak Vo2 of 10.9 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) versus 5.3 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) in women. CONCLUSIONS: Peak Vo2, exercise duration, and % ppVo2 carried the strongest ability to predict and discriminate the likelihood of death in patients with HFrEF. The prognosis associated with a given peak Vo2 differed by sex. (Exercise Training Program to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Individuals With Congestive Heart Failure; NCT00047437).
Authors: Raymond J Gibbons; Gary J Balady; J Timothy Bricker; Bernard R Chaitman; Gerald F Fletcher; Victor F Froelicher; Daniel B Mark; Ben D McCallister; Aryan N Mooss; Michael G O'Reilly; William L Winters; Raymond J Gibbons; Elliott M Antman; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Loren F Hiratzka; Alice K Jacobs; Richard O Russell; Sidney C Smith Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-10-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Clinton A Brawner; Ali Shafiq; Heather A Aldred; Jonathan K Ehrman; Eric S Leifer; Yelena Selektor; Cristina Tita; Mauricio Velez; Celeste T Williams; John R Schairer; David E Lanfear; Steven J Keteyian Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Marco Guazzi; Volker Adams; Viviane Conraads; Martin Halle; Alessandro Mezzani; Luc Vanhees; Ross Arena; Gerald F Fletcher; Daniel E Forman; Dalane W Kitzman; Carl J Lavie; Jonathan Myers Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nabil Ghorayeb; Ricardo Stein; Daniel Jogaib Daher; Anderson Donelli da Silveira; Luiz Eduardo Fonteles Ritt; Daniel Fernando Pellegrino Dos Santos; Ana Paula Rennó Sierra; Artur Haddad Herdy; Claúdio Gil Soares de Araújo; Cléa Simone Sabino de Souza Colombo; Daniel Arkader Kopiler; Filipe Ferrari Ribeiro de Lacerda; José Kawazoe Lazzoli; Luciana Diniz Nagem Janot de Matos; Marcelo Bichels Leitão; Ricardo Contesini Francisco; Rodrigo Otávio Bougleux Alô; Sérgio Timerman; Tales de Carvalho; Thiago Ghorayeb Garcia Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Andrew R Coggan; Seth R Broadstreet; Kiran Mahmood; Deana Mikhalkova; Michael Madigan; Indra Bole; Soo Park; Joshua L Leibowitz; Ana Kadkhodayan; Deepak P Thomas; Dakkota Thies; Linda R Peterson Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Andrew J Stewart Coats; Daniel E Forman; Mark Haykowsky; Dalane W Kitzman; Amy McNeil; Tavis S Campbell; Ross Arena Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Andrew P Ambrosy; Ankeet S Bhatt; Amanda L Stebbins; Lisa M Wruck; Marat Fudim; Stephen J Greene; William E Kraus; Christopher M O'Connor; Ileana L Piña; David J Whellan; Robert J Mentz Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2018-02-11 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Stephen J Greene; Robert J Mentz; Mona Fiuzat; Javed Butler; Scott D Solomon; Andrew P Ambrosy; Cyrus Mehta; John R Teerlink; Faiez Zannad; Christopher M O'Connor Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 29.690