Literature DB >> 26891861

Frequency of early warning score assessment and clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients: A randomized trial.

John Asger Petersen1, Kristian Antonsen2, Lars S Rasmussen3.   

Abstract

AIM: To explore whether early warning score (EWS) measurements at 8h intervals is associated with better outcomes than 12h intervals. We hypothesized that the proportion of patients that deteriorated to a higher EWS at 24h after hospital admission would be lower with 8h interval than with 12h interval.
METHOD: This was a pragmatic, ward-level randomized, non-blinded, controlled trial at an urban University hospital. During two six weeks periods acutely admitted surgical and medical patients, with an initial EWS of 0 or 1, were monitored either every 8th hour or every 12th hour. The primary outcome was clinical deterioration 24h post-admission, estimated by the proportion of patients with an EWS≥2 at 24h after the initial EWS on admission.
RESULTS: Of 3185 patients screened for eligibility, 1346 patients were included to the trial. Forty-nine percent were allocated to the 8h group and 51% to the 12h group; of these, 23% and 20% had an elevated EWS≥2 at 24h, respectively (p=0.456), OR 1.17 (0.78-1.76); 3.4% and 2.2%, respectively had an EWS≥5 (p=0.391), and one patient in each group had an EWS≥7 at 24h (p=1.0). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed no significant interactions for the primary outcome and the predefined variables: age, gender, ward type, and inclusion period, with an adjusted OR 1.20 (0.79-1.82). There were no significant differences in regard to the secondary outcomes: cardiac arrests, ICU admissions, review by medical emergency team (MET), length of hospital stay, or elevated EWS at 48 h. Thirty-day mortality was 1.1% vs. 1.8% (p=0.357) in the 8h group and the 12h-group, respectively (OR=0.60 (0.23-1.50), p=0.279).
CONCLUSION: We found no significant reduction in the proportion of clinical deterioration with monitoring frequencies of 3 vs. 2 times daily among patients acutely admitted to a surgical or medical ward and an initial EWS of 0-1.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early warning score; Medical emergency system; On the ward deteriorating patient; Rapid response systems

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26891861     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of Reverse Triage with National Early Warning Score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Charlson Comorbidity Index to classify medical inpatients of an Italian II level hospital according to their resource's need.

Authors:  Valeria Caramello; Giulia Marulli; Giuseppe Reimondo; Fausto Fanto'; Adriana Boccuzzi
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  In-hospital cardiac arrest and preceding National Early Warning Score (NEWS): A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Martin Spångfors; Mats Molt; Karin Samuelson
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 3.  Early warning systems and rapid response systems for the prevention of patient deterioration on acute adult hospital wards.

Authors:  Jennifer McGaughey; Dean A Fergusson; Peter Van Bogaert; Louise Rose
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-22

4.  Evaluation of the Initial General Ward Early Warning Score and ICU Admission, Hospital Length of Stay and Mortality.

Authors:  Anneke Gielen; Kristine Koekkoek; Marijke van der Steen; Martijn Looijen; Arthur R H van Zanten
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-09-02

5.  Representation learning in intraoperative vital signs for heart failure risk prediction.

Authors:  Yuwen Chen; Baolian Qi
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Vital Signs Prediction and Early Warning Score Calculation Based on Continuous Monitoring of Hospitalised Patients Using Wearable Technology.

Authors:  Ahmed Youssef Ali Amer; Femke Wouters; Julie Vranken; Dianne de Korte-de Boer; Valérie Smit-Fun; Patrick Duflot; Marie-Hélène Beaupain; Pieter Vandervoort; Stijn Luca; Jean-Marie Aerts; Bart Vanrumste
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.