Literature DB >> 26891409

Update on current evaluation and management of pediatric nasal dermoid.

Heather Herrington1, Eelam Adil1,2, Ethan Moritz1, Caroline Robson3, Antonio Perez-Atayde4, Mark Proctor5, Reza Rahbar1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To review the presentation of congenital pediatric nasal dermoid and present guidelines for its evaluation and management. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review from 1970 to 2014 at a tertiary referral children's hospital.
METHODS: The medical records of all patients diagnosed with a nasal dermoid during the study period were reviewed for demographics, lesion characteristics, imaging, operative details, and outcomes.
RESULTS: Ninety-six patients underwent excision of a congenital nasal dermoid during the study period. The mean age at presentation was 3.1 years (range, 0.1-19.3 years). Thirty-four (35%) females and 62 (65%) males were included. The most common presentation was a nasal dorsal mass in 66 (69%) patients. Ninety-two (96%) of the patients underwent preoperative imaging. Seventy-eight (82%) of the patients did not show any clinical or radiographic evidence of intracranial extension preoperatively. Eighty-five (89%) of the patients underwent extracranial excision, and 11 (11%) underwent combined intracranial and extracranial excision. Eight patients (8%) presented with recurrence, on average 3.3 years (range, 1-6 years) after initial excision. Mean follow-up time was 8 years (range, 1-18 years).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative imaging of nasal dermoid is crucial to evaluate for intracranial extension, thus facilitating complete removal. Thin section, high-resolution magnetic resonance with contrast provides excellent detail of the extent of the nasal dermoid including intracranial extension. Thin-section high-resolution computed tomography with multiplanar reformatted images provides complimentary information regarding the bone anatomy of the frontonasal region. Surgical strategy is dictated by preoperative imaging and is dependent on the extent of the lesion, but limited facial incisions are preferred. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 126:2151-2160, 2016.
© 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nasal dermoid; congenital nasal lesion; nasal obstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26891409     DOI: 10.1002/lary.25860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  3 in total

Review 1.  Meet in the middle: a technique for resecting nasocranial dermoids-technical note and review of the literature.

Authors:  Joaquin Hidalgo; Richard J Redett; Bruno P Soares; Alan R Cohen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Combined minimally invasive surgical management of a nasal dermoid sinus cyst affecting the frontal sinus: literature review and new classification.

Authors:  Martyna Waniewska-Leczycka; Tomasz Cieslik; Mariola Popko
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 1.195

3.  Congenital Mucocele of the Nasal Dorsum: A Case Report.

Authors:  Seçil Bahar Dal; Ömer Faruk Ünal
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.